100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: maybe I'm the biggest sinner... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Ha poisoning our water, what about poisoning our internet? If they attack our network mainframe US will no longer me in control, poisioning a viable resources doesnt have to be water always =)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...for thinking this, but it's an idea that has been in mind ever since, even though I'm christian. Our churches and the Bible teach about the end of the world and everything. But what if the end of the world as describe in the bible just means the moment of our dead. It makes sense when we die, it is the end of the world for each one of us. Any christian brother or sister with more light about this can explain this better to me. I might be wrong. But so far it makes sense to me because I don't think God created this beautiful world to destroyed after some thousands of years. Revelations was written at a time when Rome was in control. Everything in revelations is a direct reference to Rome and hoping that Rome will fall. It had to be written in such a messed up way so that the Romans wouldn't come in and kill the guy for calling for the downfall of Rome. The reason that it has applied to every situation for the last 2000 years is because the theme of being oppressed by a force that wants to control you is universal. In that marvelous knowledge you call a brain, you're forgetting to mention 'wormwood'. It's a comet or meterorite that comes into contact with Earth or did that happen to during the Roman regime. 
The Wormwood mentioned is supposed to poison the water. So taking what I mentioned. If you are a weaker force trying to go up against the strongest force in the world. How would you do it? Would you meet them on the battle field or attack them were they are weak? Maybe poison their water supply. Poisoning wells is nothing new. It is a great way to attack many people and it can theoretically be carried out by 1 person. This is still going on 2000 years later. from the net... Report suggests al-Qaida could poison U.S. water June 2003 U.S. Water News Online CAIRO, Egypt -- An Arabic-language magazine quotes a senior member of al-Qaida as raising the possibility that the group might poison U.S. water supplies. The Saudi-owned al-Majalla weekly also reports in its latest edition that al-Qaida militants are in the ranks of Saddam Hussein loyalists who are attacking U.S.-led forces in Iraq. The reports are based on e-mail correspondence that Al-Majalla conducted with Abu Mohammed al-Ablaj, whom the magazine identified as a senior member of al-Qaida. ``It is something that would have to be viewed seriously,'' said a U.S. counterterrorism official in Washington, speaking on the condition of anonymity. The London-based Al-Majalla began receiving al-Ablaj's e-mails last month, and a U.S. counterterrorism official said previously that al-Ablaj was believed to be an al-Qaida operative. In the earlier exchange with the magazine, al-Ablaj said al-Qaida was going to carry out major attacks in Saudi Arabia. Al-Majalla published the warning on May 11 - a day before suicide bombers detonated explosives at three housing complexes in Riyadh, killing 25 people. In the latest exchange of e-mails, al-Ablaj was quoted by the magazine as saying that al-Qaida did not rule out ``the use of Sarin gas and the poisoning of drinking water in American and Western cities.'' He was quoted as saying al-Qaida ``will present the Americans with their capabilities.'' Another one of your infamous misdirected replies. but as per your view of the ROMAN era, was their water poisoned to?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
yzrabbit1
on
Sun 02/24/08 05:17 PM
|
|
In the latest exchange of e-mails, al-Ablaj was quoted by the magazine as saying that al-Qaida did not rule out ``the use of Sarin gas and the poisoning of drinking water in American and Western cities.'' He was quoted as saying al-Qaida ``will present the Americans with their capabilities.'' Another one of your infamous misdirected replies. but as per your view of the ROMAN era, was their water poisoned to?
In fact I directed you exactly to my previous post and conected to your post. I let you choose the battle field and I worked with your premise. I do not see any try at misdirection. Again I am letting you set the stage because you are asking about poisoning in Roman times. I will respond to that directly. What follows is copied from wikipedia history of poison. ... The history of poisons[1] stretches over a period from before 4500 BC to the present day. Poisons have been used for many purposes across the span of human existence as weapons, anti-venoms and medicines, and it has allowed much progress in the branches of medicine, toxicology, and technology, among others. Poison use began in ancient times, utilised by primitive civilisations as a hunting tool to quicken and ensure the death of prey. This use of poison grew more advanced, and many of these ancient people began to forge weapons designed especially for poison enhancement. At the time of the Roman empire, poison saw one of its more prevalent uses for assassination. As early as 331 BC, poisonings executed at the dinner table or in drinks were reported, and the practice became a common occurrence. The use of fatal substances was seen among every social class; even nobility would often use it to dispose of unwanted political or economic figures for self-gain..... |
|
|
|
|
