Topic: Why is Obama considered "black"? | |
---|---|
i think that if he is elected, all of america will regret it All of America regrets the idiot Bush ever darkening the door of the White House. I don't envy the next president, whatever color or combination of colors he/she may be. |
|
|
|
i think that if he is elected, all of america will regret it All of America regrets the idiot Bush ever darkening the door of the White House. I don't envy the next president, whatever color or combination of colors he/she may be. All of America? heres an example of a typical lie told like its a fact. |
|
|
|
Toast: Yes he would have a cabinet and advisors, but in the ene he would have to make the decisions and just because he has carisma does not mean he has the experience and background make sound decisions. Gee he has all of what 2 years in the senate and he has spent most of that time campaigning for the presidency. Based on that no one in their right mind would hire him to be the CEO of a large company what makes people think he can run this country based on that. question, you a fan of bush? if so, i wouldn't deal with the inexperience thing. that man has appointed many know nothings into positions.. |
|
|
|
Edited by
toastedoranges
on
Fri 02/15/08 12:01 PM
|
|
All of America? heres an example of a typical lie told like its a fact. you are right, it's only the ones with a connection to reality and a strong sense of right and wrong |
|
|
|
toast once agin you make a 90 degree turn from the subject. We weren't discussing Bush's appointments or their lack of experience, we were talking about Obama's experience and lack thererof. Now he is hammering on CEO salaries and harping about the CEO of Exxon making 13 million while he remains silent about the 25 million George Clooney one of his backers made last year. The man is a socialist to the core. If he is elected and implements the taxes he wants look for the stock market to drop 3000 points.
|
|
|
|
toast once agin you make a 90 degree turn from the subject. We weren't discussing Bush's appointments or their lack of experience, we were talking about Obama's experience and lack thererof. Now he is hammering on CEO salaries and harping about the CEO of Exxon making 13 million while he remains silent about the 25 million George Clooney one of his backers made last year. The man is a socialist to the core. If he is elected and implements the taxes he wants look for the stock market to drop 3000 points. my point... don't be a hypocrit. personally, i don't really support obama. i just don't like all the missinformation and bias that everyone seems to have against him |
|
|
|
What's the diff. on his race? why not ask something such as...What's his platform? What are his views on the Constitution? Would he support the "Fair Tax"?
|
|
|
|
i agree whats the diff, but recognising someones race isnt being racist, its having eyes.
|
|
|
|
There was on mis information in my statement. The man is a first term senator he has 2 years of experinece at the Federal level, he has spent most of that time running for president. That is FACT! not misinformation. Funny how every time someone starts stating facts that don't reflect favorably on the socialist darlings they are branded as hypocrits. Fact Obama is supported by George Clooney who made 25 million last year but Obama chooses to attack the CEO of Exxon for making too much money when he made half as much as Obama's supporter Clooney. That IS hyporacy.
|
|
|
|
All of America? heres an example of a typical lie told like its a fact. you are right, it's only the ones with a connection to reality and a strong sense of right and wrong So you literally just stated that I, a person who supported George Bush Junior in his reelection, am not connected with reality, and that I do not know right from wrong? I know one thing, and that is that you are on a very thin edge. You need to be very careful of what you say, and even more careful of what you write. using myself as an example, I was awarded full custody of my children in court. That is full LEGAL and COUSTODIAL custody. How many men can say this has happened? For a judge to stand there and say that I have full custody, inherently states that I am of sound mind, connected with reality, AND know right from wrong. Please, do not EVER use the word all when making a statement about groups again, nor make statements such as the one you made about those in disagreement with you not being of proper mind and mentality. |
|
|
|
So you literally just stated that I, a person who supported George Bush Junior in his reelection, am not connected with reality, and that I do not know right from wrong?
I know one thing, and that is that you are on a very thin edge. You need to be very careful of what you say, and even more careful of what you write. using myself as an example, I was awarded full custody of my children in court. That is full LEGAL and COUSTODIAL custody. How many men can say this has happened? For a judge to stand there and say that I have full custody, inherently states that I am of sound mind, connected with reality, AND know right from wrong. Please, do not EVER use the word all when making a statement about groups again, nor make statements such as the one you made about those in disagreement with you not being of proper mind and mentality. a reality disconnect is the only excusable reason and i wouldn't bring up the custody thing, you can't tell me that there aren't tons of people awarded custody when they don't deserve it. try again |
|
|
|
So you literally just stated that I, a person who supported George Bush Junior in his reelection, am not connected with reality, and that I do not know right from wrong?
I know one thing, and that is that you are on a very thin edge. You need to be very careful of what you say, and even more careful of what you write. using myself as an example, I was awarded full custody of my children in court. That is full LEGAL and COUSTODIAL custody. How many men can say this has happened? For a judge to stand there and say that I have full custody, inherently states that I am of sound mind, connected with reality, AND know right from wrong. Please, do not EVER use the word all when making a statement about groups again, nor make statements such as the one you made about those in disagreement with you not being of proper mind and mentality. a reality disconnect is the only excusable reason and i wouldn't bring up the custody thing, you can't tell me that there aren't tons of people awarded custody when they don't deserve it. try again In your opinion a reality disconnection is the only excusable reason. However, the fact remains I am very much considered to be connected with reality. I have received custody. I hold a minimum of a ten thousand dollar bond in order to perform my work in the field of security (have held this bond for over 5 years now). The point is you can not legally speak for every single person on any given subject. So you can not make statements saying that a person is not sound of mind or anything like that just because their opinion differs from yours. It is considered defamation of character at a minimum, and if you do so with the intent to make a person look bad, you can be held accountable for slander. So I ask again, do not make broad statements that will include myself in them, as you are unable and do not have the authority to speak on my behalf. |
|
|
|
In your opinion a reality disconnection is the only excusable reason. However, the fact remains I am very much considered to be connected with reality. I have received custody. I hold a minimum of a ten thousand dollar bond in order to perform my work in the field of security (have held this bond for over 5 years now). The point is you can not legally speak for every single person on any given subject. So you can not make statements saying that a person is not sound of mind or anything like that just because their opinion differs from yours. It is considered defamation of character at a minimum, and if you do so with the intent to make a person look bad, you can be held accountable for slander.
So I ask again, do not make broad statements that will include myself in them, as you are unable and do not have the authority to speak on my behalf. and that's how serious you take this? yeah ok, have fun with that |
|
|
|
and i wouldn't bring up the custody thing, you can't tell me that there aren't tons of people awarded custody when they don't deserve it.
Obviously you have no understanding of family court and how the odds are stacked against a father. The mere fact that a father is willing to fight for custody speaks volumes for his integrity is a telling sign of a devoted parent as caring for children on a day to day basis is a job like no other. The fact that a judge awarded him custody means that the judge has faith in the man's ability to look out for the children's best interest. Let me know when you are successful in court obtaining custody and we'll see if you still want to insult the man. |
|
|
|
Obviously you have no understanding of family court and how the odds are stacked against a father. The mere fact that a father is willing to fight for custody speaks volumes for his integrity is a telling sign of a devoted parent as caring for children on a day to day basis is a job like no other. The fact that a judge awarded him custody means that the judge has faith in the man's ability to look out for the children's best interest. Let me know when you are successful in court obtaining custody and we'll see if you still want to insult the man. you know his situation? i don't, don't care either. for all i know, the ex could be a horrible parent and he was the better option. and i dirrectly spoke ill of noone |
|
|