We as human beings think about money before love! It's okay! Because it is impossible for any of us to make money. I think if someone thinks there is love in him and he wants to keep the man he loves happy, then even if he has no money, we can close our eyes and go with him only because of love, because if I give courage to the man I love, Becoming a supporter, today or tomorrow, success is inevitable. But one owns a lot of money from his father's money, but to say that he is worthy is to spend one father's money. He is like a fallen flower in a big man's garden, because he has nothing to say about his own merits. But it's real, everyone desperate to run to them, to look at someone else for a while to fulfill small hobbies, that's an insult

WE PASS ON STUFF THAT IS A LOT MORE IMPORTANT, LIKE

OUR EMOTIONAL GAMES....LIKE , POOR ME, AIN'T IT

AWFUL ,WOODEN LEG, ALCOHOLIC,THAT'S A VERY SHORT

LIST......PEOPLE WILL SPEND THERE WHOLE LIVES

PLAYING OUT THERE FAMILY DRAMA'S....SO MUCH OF

LIFE'S TIME IS SPENT FALLING IN LOVE WITH PEOPLE

WHO WILL SUPPORT THOSE DRAMA'S....

I really don't understand your Stu... English , Its all going over my head . Either you Improve your style of writing or I have to learn it from the beginning.

For thousands of generations, and probably before we were even humans (if you believe in evolution) it was important for a woman to find a mate who could support her (someone had to hunt while she was gravid, and nursing) and who had a high status in society (because this creates safety from others).

Women who were not successful in getting a provider of high status were less likely to have surviving children. Each generation, the more likely a woman naturally sought out a man who would lead to her and her children surviving, the more likely those children were to survive. Likewise, the more a man was willing to submit to being the provider, gain social standing, and care for his offspring, the more likely his children of similar tendency would survive. All of us—men and women alike—carry the genes of this very natural progress.

Today, this is reflected in women looking for men with assets, who are looked up to by others, and who work hard to bring in money. Men, meanwhile, generally do not feel fulfilled unless working to provide for their mate and children. Modern society, the welfare state, etc. has distorted all this but it is still a part of the natural people we typically are.

I agree with you that a man (and to some extent a woman, too) is more likely to be successful when with a partner. The saying in English that all great men have a great woman behind them carries a lot of truth, even if the great woman's main effect is to provide feminine motivation for the man. When you look at great women, you will also usually find a great man doing what he finds natural to do: work to support or to maintain the wealth of the family. In modern times, in societies that allow for mobility in status and wealth, I think there is some recognition of this, though young men and women would do well to remember that if only they support one another and stop trying to compete with each other, their individual and joint success is a lot more certain.