Topic: Big Brother To Decide If You Drive | |
---|---|
Source:
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/november2006/201106bigbrother.htm (Please go to main link above to see photos, images & mainstream documented source links within live article... Thanks!) (IMAGE) Big Brother To Decide If You Drive 245 million Americans to be forced to undergo "guilty until proven innocent" breathalyzer tests just to start their cars if plan proceeds Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones Prison Planet Monday, November 20, 2006 Just when you thought the Orwellian Big Brother society couldn't possibly accelerate further, it gets even worse. A move is afoot to force 245 million drivers in America to have alcohol breathalyzers fitted in their vehicles, ignition interlocks that prevent the vehicle from being started by an inebriant. "The threat of arrest and punishment, for decades the primary tactic against drunken drivers, is no longer working in the struggle to reduce the death toll, officials say, and they are proposing turning to technology — alcohol detection devices in every vehicle — to address the problem," reports the New York Times. In addition, Mothers Against Drunk Drivers today began a campaign to make all states pass legislation that mandates these devices be placed in all cars of drunk drivers, even if they are just a first time offender. Mandatory breathalyzers in all vehicles is just one item in a veritable surveillance package that all drivers will be forced to accept if they wish to use America's roads and highways. - GPS tracking and taxation black boxes are being pushed to coincide with the construction of the NAFTA Superhighway, where all vehicles will be forced to use toll roads and will have their every movement catalogued by spy satellites in alliance with a massive centralized database. - US citizens will be forced to adopt a de-facto national identification card and have their freedom of mobility defined by behavioral fealty to the government under proposals set to derive from NAFTA superhighway toll road systems and the implementation of the American Union. - Biometric eye scanners that can detect tiredness and deny mobility if the system judges the driver to be fatigued are being proposed for individual vehicle use after being utilized by police in Australia. - Proposals are in play to install surveillance cameras in all cars, especially in areas where legislation has been passed that bans the individual from smoking in their own car if a child is also present. - In March 2004, Toyota launched its concept car of the future - a literal behavior modification surveillance center on wheels - festooned with Big Brother technology - that will record every nuance and error the driver exhibits, and will limit its performance based on those factors, including refusing to turn itself on. Industry publications and other motor industry giants have also touted surveillance infested vehicles as the model for all future development. The installation of mandatory breathalyzers in all vehicles by law is a death knell for freedom of mobility and directly violates the 4th amendment, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." (IMAGE) The following points also illustrate why the move is a dangerous and harebrained idea. - Though billed as a "non-profit organization," Mothers Against Drunk Driving is a front group for the auto industry and has been caught in the past stealing money it raises through telemarketing. The American Institute of Philanthropy has given MADD poor grades for its high bureaucratic and fundraising costs. - MADD advocates warrantless random roadblocks and checkpoints to supposedly find drunk drivers, violating the U.S. constitution and instilling fear into people for simply having a glass of wine with their meal. - Apologists for the program cite seatbelts as an example of a security measure that was beneficial, yet don't understand the slippery slide to fascism that inevitably comes as a result of restricting mobility. - Drunks kill around 40,000 people a year and yet prescription drugs kill over 200,000. Medical malpractice kills over 300,000 - but the media hasn't brainwashed Americans to be fearful or upset about the bigger dangers and so they don't care. The hyped specter of drunk driving deaths manipulates whining do-gooders to call for their own enslavement, anything to save a few lives. - In the majority of areas in the south-west, around half of DWI's involve illegal aliens, but nobody is prepared to face up to that problem. A study by the Highway Safety Research Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill found Hispanic drivers involved in crashes were three times more likely to be drunk than white or black drivers. As Paul McNamara of Network World points out, the potential ramifications for fitting every car with such a device are ominous. "There is, of course, the straightforward civil libertarian question: Why should those who have never been convicted of drunken driving be compelled to prove they are innocent before being allowed to operate their own cars? This baby seems to have been tossed with the bathwater long ago in a country where drug testing has become routine, but you can expect the die-hards to be heard anew." "How far down the technology slope are we sliding? Certainly, any such standard automobile equipment could include a record-keeping component. Will attempted drunken driving become a crime? There could be no denying the deterrent effect of such a new law. Three rejected start attempts and you lose your license? Five and the ignition is permanently disabled? Certainly the advocates will make the case than an ounce of prevention beats even one more highway fatality." "What about networking? Will the data be wirelessly transmitted to your local police department? Why not? It would clearly help law enforcement target and keep tabs on the recidivists. And the cops will need to know when to pull your license for that third strike." |
|
|
|
???????Why would this be a problem if your not a drunk driver, which
happens to be illegal last time i checked??????? GUESS WHAT CLASS .... people are dying over drunk drivers....... |
|
|
|
Some people should have as mandatory.
|
|
|
|
if you've already been convicted, even once...it should be mandatory.
|
|
|
|
Amazing... but what is being missed is that regardless you, I and (ALL)
Americans will be (Forced) to have these installed in (All) the new upcoming cars, trucks, jeeps etc. Surveillance cameras (in your car watching & listening to you) warrantless Big Brother taxing you as you drive on the American Union Electronic Toll Roads. EVERYTHING being tracked and traced without mine and your permission like criminals. ... Listen ... I"M NORMAL this is total COOCOO LAND & TOTAL ENSLAVEMENT. Maybe we should change are national theme to "Land Of The Slaves... Home of The Cowards!" I know I"M not accepting this electronic prisonitory control grid going up... how about you? |
|
|
|
I have serious doubts about being forced to have cameras IN our cars. It
is private property and is no less an invasion of that privacy than being forced to have cameras in our homes. I also can't see the auto maufacturers going along with these ideas. The cost of adding all these high tech devices would make the cost of a vehicle so prohibitive that the average person won't be able to afford a new car. If the gov't is THAT concerned about our saftey maybe they should force auto manufacturers to quit producing cars that are capable of doing twice the highway speed limit. But the gov't DOESN'T REALLY CARE about your personal safety, just interfering in your personal privacy. And altho the breathalyzer lock is a good idea, it won't prevent ppl who are high on presription drugs or illegal narcotics from starting up their car and driving. |
|
|
|
I personally like the idea of a micro chip in our brains so the Gov. can
monitor our thoughts. So if we have a Rep in the White House, and you are having dirty thoughts. You will soon have a knock on your door from the thought police. LMFAO However if we have a Dem in there then you better have a dirty thought! Or else you'll be TAXED TO DEATH!!! BAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
heh..whatever..like its gonna happen..if they wanna watch me in my car
fine let em, they gonna get real fuckin bored doin it |
|
|
|
You never know Poet. Clinton maybe watchin you now. LOL
|
|
|
|
LMAO then he's watchin me flip his dumb ass off LMAO..geez Bill next
time get a gurl who swallows the evidence lol |
|
|
|
omg lmfaoooooooooo
|
|
|
|
heh just keepin it real lol ok I'm out nite Ghost<hugs da Ghost>
Nite my lil donkey <hugs da lil donkey> |
|
|
|
nite nite Poet < hugs da jell-o puddin pop> hehehe
|
|
|
|
You can bring BIG BROTHER down just by one punch to the groin.
If you are man enough that is. |
|
|
|
Didnt miss the part about the unit being installed in the vehicle.
Still not a problem if you dont drink and drive. This is not a new idea, its been around for 15 yrs that I know of. You already have a recorder in your car, in the Brain. It can recall the last controls used and other info. Accident investigators use this information when it is available. I wouldent mind knowing as much as possible about an accident. This is just an extrapolation of that idea. I dont have any secrets so I dont care what "THEY" do to watch me or record my movements. |
|
|
|
Cool! A black box in the car.
So when you've totally recked the car, they can scrape you up and retrieve the blackbox. |
|
|
|
yah. "THEY" HAVE been doing that for a few years now. Dont know exactly
what info is on there, but there is braking, aceleration, turn signals, speed, and probably more. EVER NOTICE THAT EVEN THOUGH Electronics are geting smaller, the brain in a car is getting bigger?hmmmmmmmmmm I still maintin that unless your guilty of something, Why care? Are we after truth or some illusion? |
|
|
|
At first they covince you that there is a good reason for it then. they
abuse it that is why? |
|
|
|
rambillsheep
|
|
|
|
There goes Will and his Sheep Fantasies again.... Will, treat yourself
good this Holiday season and buy yourself a woman for a night.. This site is Just Say Hi, not Just Say Baaaaahhhh! Besides, "SheepBill" sounds much better ;-) |
|
|