7 Quotes from Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood


“We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

In a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble in December, 19, 1939, Sanger exposited her vision for the “Negro Project,” a freshly launched collaboration between the American Birth Control League and Sanger’s Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau. The letter echoes the eugenic ideologies still visible within the corporate vein of Planned Parenthood today.




“I accepted an invitation to talk to the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan.”

In 1926, Sanger spoke at a Ku Klux Klan rally in 1926 in Silver Lake, New Jersey. Following the invitation, Sanger describes her elation after receiving multiple speaking requests from white supremacy groups. She writes of the experience on page 366 of her book, An Autobiography:
I accepted an invitation to talk to the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan … I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and illuminated crosses … I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak … In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered.




“They are…human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ’spawning… human beings who never should have been born.”

In “Pivot of Civilization,” Sanger penned her thoughts regarding immigrants, the poor, and the error of philanthropy. Sanger’s ideology of racial and social hygiene bleeds through her writings on breeding an ideal human race: They are…human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ’spawning… human beings who never should have been born. Organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease…Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks [of people] that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant.




“Birth control is nothing more or less than…weeding out the unfit.”

Sanger famously coined the term “birth control” with the intention of eliminating the reproduction of human beings who were considered “less fit.” In her writings from “Morality and Birth Control” and “Birth Control and the New Race,” the Planned Parenthood founder noted that the chief aim of the practice of birth control is to produce a “cleaner race.” Sanger’s vision for birth control was to prevent the birth of individuals whom she believed were unfit for mankind:





 “Human beings who never should have been born at all.”

In “The Pivot of Civilization” and “A Plan for Peace,” Sanger describes the eugenic value of eliminating
persons – minorities, the sick, and the disabled – through sterilization or segregation





“I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world.”

In an 1957 interview with journalist Mike Wallace, Sanger advocated that the greatest evil is a family that chooses to bring children into the world. Sanger, who advocated for a system requiring every American family to submit a request to the government to have a child, told America Weekly in 1934 that it has “become necessary to establish a system of BIRTH PERMITS”






“But for my view, I believe that there should be no more babies.”

In a 1947 interview that surfaced via the British Pathe, Sanger described her desire for women in the developed world to cease completely from reproduction.  When asked by the reporter whether this would be impractical to ask women who desire children, but would no longer be able to conceive in 10 years, Sanger said, “I should think instead of being impractical, it is really very practical and intelligent and humane.”





These are the very words of a racist. The Democrat/Socialist/Fascists wish to continue her vision of eugenics.

But they won't defend innocent babies...for love of blood money.





.

This speaks to an issue I have repeatedly discussed, that people are not one dimensional, "good or bad" people. People are complex and layered. so people can exist in their lifetime and do things to be admired AND also do things to be deplored. Margaret did exploit racism, but she also provided much needed resources for women.

She is few people's hero because of her stance on race. But she may be many peoples 'hero' when it comes to her contribution to women's health resources.

I love R KELLY music because he is a talented musician. I don't love R Kelly's fetishes and kinks.

I love Farrakhans overall wit and intelligence. I dont love Farrakhans more extreme views about white people.

This is why I dont make 'heros' out of humans, because next to none have lived saintly lives and done only what was 'good and right' in them.

Yes, if you hate the right people, you are a hero. Look at Jussie Smollett. He is a disgusting piece of human debris who attempted to stir up the worst hate and anger, but he is on the "correct" side, so no matter how disgusting he is, people will find him "complex and layered." Those who excuse him also have one dimensional views of those on the opposite side, and stereotype and hate them. They even think that their extreme views are mainstream, so they form ugly mobs to chase these people out of malls and restaurants.

There isn't anything "complex" if you are one of those many people triggered by a hat...

People have to be reminded we have not always lived in a perfect world like we do today. Civilization has evolved over time and continues to change. We have been told that we should only have one sex partner at a time, there is even some laws pertaining to this, however there are still many out there cheating on others, or in relationships where people know this is going on. My point is society has come up with this rule, not nature, many people fallow this rule, but many don't. So if enough people are led to believe a certain race is inferior this too will become part of our civilized thinking. If you would have posted these quotes back in 1940 many would have thought different then they do in 2019. She later said that all women in the developed world should not have children, that would have only caused more of her unwanted people, and fewer of her wanted people. It is against the law to neglect a child, however if the government does step in it is rare that the parent is ever prosecuted even if the child is removed from the home. Many people hate planned parenthood because they are one of the few places where you can get a safe abortions. However there goal is to stop people before they get pregnant and go looking for an abortion, they also control the spread of STDs. Its clear you are not going to keep people from having sex, but if you can teach them to do it responsibly as Planned Parenthoods goal is it will make society better as a whole.

well, there is no accounting for inconsistency, particularly for people who make 'heros' out of fallible human beings. Or who claim to care about babies, but whine and fuss if any of 'their' money is actually put towards trying to support those in poor families. Or who claim vitriol for stirring up hate, but idolize a POTUS who regularly uses rhetoric that does just that, like claiming only 'some' mexicans might be 'decent' people, and the rest rapists and criminals.

I dont know about other balanced and rational minds, but

I dont know if an entertainer stirring up hate and anger is any more 'human debris' than a POTUS who does the same, do you?

my point was exactly what you may inadvertently be supporting. People that view everything in black and white 'us vs them' mentality, who describe a situation much more often by what box an individual fit than by what individual situation and choice that individual made, dont see anything as 'complex'. and only continue the 'us vs them' rhetoric that pretends people are either heroes or 'human debris'.

a major tactic in gaining approval of the torture or mistreatment of others, is to put them in some simplistic category serving to dehumanize them.

The best thing one can do is to not be herded by the media, but look how many lemmings they rule. I don't worry about those hounded by the media. Those types are under control. I'd rather try to get the attention of the cult, as hard as that is...

Oh, and if you can excuse those trying to incite racial hatred, you ARE the problem.

It is terrible how the democratic party does support the murder of innocent babes lives . Millions of innocent lives murdered yearly.

Yet they support ILLEGALS crossing Borders into the US. Of them includes criminals , who want to help Destroy the US.

There is no argument just pure ignorance.

who excused anything? Context much?

If my next door neighbor feeds the poor and saves someone from a fire but later robs a bank, can't ALL actions be acknowledged? Why must one only frame that person as a thief, without acknowledging they are also charitable? Is it excusing their thievery to acknowledge they are also charitable?

like I said, people are complex, they can be responsible for their bad choices AND commended for their good ones, without fitting neatly or completely in any box.

Would that be the same way republicans 'support' millons of innocent lives murdered by turning them away when they come for help from the US.

ITs not either/or, there are PEOPLE and PEOPLE exist across parties and across boxes.

Innocent babies.

No comparison!! Leftist have No Logic !

pot meet kettle ...

Wrong as Usual. !!

The best thing one can do is to not be Decieved by Leftist media.

That has never happened. More false narrative to avoid looking at the horrible truth of your positions


You admit to liking Farakhan? Wow...easily the top racist in America.

You excuse Margaret Sanger for wanting to snuff out your race? Wow. just wow.

wow, is the growing epidemic of adults who have no concept of what CONTEXT is and who INSIST everyone exists in some one dimensional utopia where they are 'either' good 'or' bad, instead of being fallible, EACH AND EVERY ONE, sometimes doing good and bad, sometimes doing right and wrong.

I said I like Farakhan's wit and DONT like some of his extreme views.
I said I dont like Sangers views about blacks, but do give her CREDIT for creating a resource for women's health.

The left, will always twist, spin, and use blatant deception,
to achieve their goals.

One side uses the old "your extremists are utterly contemptible, but mine have some good ideas." Pretty sad when it comes to that, but it sure has, hasn't it?

If George Orwell was alive today, he would say "Hey, it's REALLY dark in here!!"

Now we see what kind of hypocrites they are. Scary isn't it? It makes one wonder if they really mean what they are saying? Or' is just blowing off at the mouth on a public forum just because of being proven wrong in so many ways. That they just don't worry about what they put on a public forum. A Life is a life. No more or less than the other. Whether it's on this side of the border or the other. They both are just as important.

But let's say for the sake of argument that they really do feel that way. Well, now we see how low some people can go. You say turning them away is murder. And it is. But if someone says that the death of that child is different from the death of another, just because they come from the other side of the fence, what does that make that person?

The One Question That Can Tell Us Who's a Narcissist

"Narcissists tend to feel entitled, with (over)inflated views of themselves and low levels of empathy".

http://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/the-one-question-can-tell-us-whos-narcissist

This pretty well explains why so many are so far up Trump's azz. The old saying is true, "Birds of a feather flock together. I think it's reasonable to believe that's why around 31% of the country still follow him. They are just as narcissistic as he is. When you believe that one life is more important than another just based on which side of the "wall" this person is on, what else does that make you?

I'm not going to say it. But I know you know. There are a lot of sick puppies in the world that need help.

you mean like Trump DERANGEMENT Syndrome?

Yea, those people are really hypocrites, right?

Could not agree more