100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: St. senator Black tells about Soros | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
http://www.rt.com/news/410652-george-soros-one-world-government/
George Soros seeks a one world government to serve oligarchs, not the people’ – US State Senator Published time: 22 Nov, 2017 16:09 Edited time: 22 Nov, 2017 16:28 ‘George Soros seeks a one world government to serve oligarchs, not the people’ – US State Senator George Soros. © Andreas Gebert / Global Look Pres For people like Soros and the globalists; they view the nation-state as a problem, because the nation expresses the will of the people of that nation, and it serves their personal interest, Richard Black, Republican Virginia state Senator, told RT. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and the Fidesz Party Vice Chairman Gergely Gulyás are locked in a desperate battle with the billionaire financier and philanthropist George Soros, as well as his ideologically driven campaign to allow thousands of migrants to flood into Europe. Leaders like Orban say the strategy will lead to the total collapse of a “Christian Europe,” and argue that Soros is trying to subvert Hungary and the rest of the EU. RT: What reputation does George Soros and the Open Society Foundations have in the world? What role do they play? Richard Black: George Soros is an immensely wealthy billionaire. He has an interest in converting the world. He has a very, very sinister reputation throughout the world, and he is viewed widely as being anti-moral and anti-nationalistic. His belief appears to be that we should have a globalist government that dictates to the people and that nations are a sort of an impediment, because when you have national governments – they express the will of the people. When you have a globalist government it simply exhibits the views of the oligarchs and has very little regard for the people. That is the side he is on – he is with the oligarchs, he is not with the ordinary people. RT: The Hungarian government and the ruling party have been accusing George Soros of interfering in the domestic affairs of Hungary and other nations. Do you think their claims are valid? Do they have a reason to be wary of Soros’ activities? RB: Soros has interfered very dramatically in the affairs of Hungary and a number of eastern European countries. But right now his focus is on Hungary. I would certainly applaud the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. Orban is a man who gets things done. When he had illegal immigrants pouring across the border into Hungary, he sent the army out, he put up a wall, and within a month he had stopped immigration from crossing Hungary. I think for people like Soros and the rest of the globalists, they view the nation-state as a problem because the nation expresses the will of the people of that nation and it serves their personal interest. Whereas if you have a one world government than it can simply disregard the interest of the people, and it can basically cater to the very wealthy oligarchs. I would mention that the background of Soros is a very, very poor one. He is known as the man, who was a currency manipulator, who broke the Bank of England – one of the most powerful banks in the world. He disrupted the Malaysian financial stability back in 1997, and he crushed the Bank of Thailand and forced 600,000 temporary workers to give up their homes and leave. So he thinks nothing of ordinary people. He is willing to crush them out; he is willing to destroy their lives and their livelihoods. Prime Minister Orban and also the Fidesz Vice Chairman [Gergely] Gulyás have united and have fought very hard against Soros. Soros is trying to subvert the country of Hungary. He does it through these non-governmental organizations. The NGOs – there are some good ones, but there are very many of them that act as a Fifth Column to undermine the stability and integrity of the countries. Often they work in conjunction with covert intelligence agencies – whether it is the CIA, MI6, French intelligence and so on. They act as sort of an internal intelligence agency that is always there when the time comes to overthrow the government. The prime minister of Hungary recognizes this danger. He is not going to stand for it. One of the big points of contention is that Soros is running a university in Budapest to promote the liberal ideas he believes in. These are ideas that break down the culture, they break down the moral values, and they break down the national integrity of the nation… RT: Soros had been calling for the EU to apply pressure against conservative governments of Hungary and Poland, while Soros-funded NGOs are heavily criticizing EU countries for not accepting more migrants and asylum seekers. What, in your opinion, does Soros wish to achieve do doing this? RB: The real rebellion against the European Union seems to be emanating from the eastern European countries. Soros is also having great conflict with Poland. Poland is becoming increasingly nationalistic. They are adamantly opposed to immigration. The immigrants flow through Eastern Europe into Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel invited a million immigrants to be brought to Germany, and of course, they immediately began raping and terrorizing the nation. And it looks as though Angela Merkel may very well lose her leadership in Germany. The country has been thrown into a crisis strictly because of the sexual assault of the German people by the immigrants that were brought in, by people like Soros, by people like the European Union. I think where you see the strongest resistance is in Eastern Europe. Not so much in Germany, not so much in France, which is almost a lost country by now. But there is still the ability of the people of Eastern Europe to rise up and fight this… RT: How do you think things will develop in Hungary? How will the people react there? RB: There will be an immense amount of money that will be spent against Prime Minister Orban and against his party. But I have watched the Hungarian people throughout their history, and there are no tougher or more independent people than the Hungarians. I have great confidence in the nation of Hungary. I know they will be influenced by the EU that will pressure them and try to compel them through dictatorial means to accept whatever the EU wants, including the reinstitution of the whole corrupt Soros organization there that seeks to undermine the values of the Hungarian people. Hey guest, welcome to RT! Sign up and become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not only is he anti-America and funds many leftist groups in America, he is a despicable person.
Here is an interview where he admits to helping Nazi take personal belongings of Jews during the Nazi occupation with no regrets. In a 1998 interview with CBS’ Steve Kroft, Soros admitted that he participated in the confiscation of Jewish property under the Nazi occupation. He also explained that he had no remorse for what he had done, and that if he had not participated, somebody else would have done it anyway. Steve Kroft: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson. Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews. George Soros: Yes. That’s right. Yes. Steve Kroft: That sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult? George Soros: No, not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t–you don’t see the connection. But it created no problem at all. Steve Kroft: No feeling of guilt? George Soros: No. Steve Kroft: For example that, ‘I’m Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.’ None of that? George Soros: Well, of course I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in markets–that if I weren’t there–of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would–would–would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the–whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the–I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.” In A separate interview Soros said that when he was in charge of confiscating land from the Jews in Nazi occupied Hungry it was the "happiest time of my life". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘isn’t this a problem everywhere’?
what about those who people who are trying to find a job? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘isn’t this a problem everywhere’? what about those who people who are trying to find a job? its always a toss up whether 'helping others' is charitable or has alternative intentions, but at the end of the day, I'm sure those who receive the helping hand don't really care what 'motive' is behind it. and greed will be a problem everywhere people have great wealth and/or power, which is contributing to people trying to find jobs they can pay the bills with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘isn’t this a problem everywhere’? what about those who people who are trying to find a job? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 11/24/17 10:30 AM
|
|
Not only is he anti-America and funds many leftist groups in America, he is a despicable person. Here is an interview where he admits to helping Nazi take personal belongings of Jews during the Nazi occupation with no regrets. In a 1998 interview with CBS’ Steve Kroft, Soros admitted that he participated in the confiscation of Jewish property under the Nazi occupation. He also explained that he had no remorse for what he had done, and that if he had not participated, somebody else would have done it anyway. Steve Kroft: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson. Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews. George Soros: Yes. That’s right. Yes. Steve Kroft: That sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult? George Soros: No, not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t–you don’t see the connection. But it created no problem at all. Steve Kroft: No feeling of guilt? George Soros: No. Steve Kroft: For example that, ‘I’m Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.’ None of that? George Soros: Well, of course I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in markets–that if I weren’t there–of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would–would–would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the–whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the–I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.” In A separate interview Soros said that when he was in charge of confiscating land from the Jews in Nazi occupied Hungry it was the "happiest time of my life". of course he was 14, assisting the person who was his guardian, and it was property, not life. I could see if he felt this way about gassing people, or shooting them down. But in context, it is akin to if deportation of law abiding immigrant children were someday deemed a horrific human rights violation ... If you would ask those whose job it is now in thirty years if they felt bad about it(let alone if they were teens doing that 'job') Im sure they would have a clear conscience, because it was the law at the time and the culture where they would have no reason to think it would not be done, in accordance with law at the time, with or without them with perhaps what was some type of cultural socioeconomic justification at the time. In any case, he has done plenty of charity since giving out more than he could have ever participated in taking. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not only is he anti-America and funds many leftist groups in America, he is a despicable person. Here is an interview where he admits to helping Nazi take personal belongings of Jews during the Nazi occupation with no regrets. In a 1998 interview with CBS’ Steve Kroft, Soros admitted that he participated in the confiscation of Jewish property under the Nazi occupation. He also explained that he had no remorse for what he had done, and that if he had not participated, somebody else would have done it anyway. Steve Kroft: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson. Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews. George Soros: Yes. That’s right. Yes. Steve Kroft: That sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult? George Soros: No, not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t–you don’t see the connection. But it created no problem at all. Steve Kroft: No feeling of guilt? George Soros: No. Steve Kroft: For example that, ‘I’m Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.’ None of that? George Soros: Well, of course I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in markets–that if I weren’t there–of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would–would–would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the–whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the–I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.” In A separate interview Soros said that when he was in charge of confiscating land from the Jews in Nazi occupied Hungry it was the "happiest time of my life". of course he was 14, assisting the person who was his guardian, and it was property, not life. I could see if he felt this way about gassing people, or shooting them down. But in context, it is akin to if deportation of law abiding immigrant children were someday deemed a horrific human rights violation ... If you would ask those whose job it is now in thirty years if they felt bad about it(let alone if they were teens doing that 'job') Im sure they would have a clear conscience, because it was the law at the time and the culture where they would have no reason to think it would not be done, in accordance with law at the time, with or without them with perhaps what was some type of cultural socioeconomic justification at the time. In any case, he has done plenty of charity since giving out more than he could have ever participated in taking. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not only is he anti-America and funds many leftist groups in America, he is a despicable person. Here is an interview where he admits to helping Nazi take personal belongings of Jews during the Nazi occupation with no regrets. In a 1998 interview with CBS’ Steve Kroft, Soros admitted that he participated in the confiscation of Jewish property under the Nazi occupation. He also explained that he had no remorse for what he had done, and that if he had not participated, somebody else would have done it anyway. Steve Kroft: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson. Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews. George Soros: Yes. That’s right. Yes. Steve Kroft: That sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult? George Soros: No, not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t–you don’t see the connection. But it created no problem at all. Steve Kroft: No feeling of guilt? George Soros: No. Steve Kroft: For example that, ‘I’m Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.’ None of that? George Soros: Well, of course I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in markets–that if I weren’t there–of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would–would–would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the–whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the–I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.” In A separate interview Soros said that when he was in charge of confiscating land from the Jews in Nazi occupied Hungry it was the "happiest time of my life". of course he was 14, assisting the person who was his guardian, and it was property, not life. I could see if he felt this way about gassing people, or shooting them down. But in context, it is akin to if deportation of law abiding immigrant children were someday deemed a horrific human rights violation ... If you would ask those whose job it is now in thirty years if they felt bad about it(let alone if they were teens doing that 'job') Im sure they would have a clear conscience, because it was the law at the time and the culture where they would have no reason to think it would not be done, in accordance with law at the time, with or without them with perhaps what was some type of cultural socioeconomic justification at the time. In any case, he has done plenty of charity since giving out more than he could have ever participated in taking. how did he get rich as a teenager? Its like saying my son got rich by working at taco bell as a teen. They had to pay him, but he wasnt the one making any significant financial gain. I also don't compare the theft of property with the dehumanizing of a person into property. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not only is he anti-America and funds many leftist groups in America, he is a despicable person. Here is an interview where he admits to helping Nazi take personal belongings of Jews during the Nazi occupation with no regrets. In a 1998 interview with CBS’ Steve Kroft, Soros admitted that he participated in the confiscation of Jewish property under the Nazi occupation. He also explained that he had no remorse for what he had done, and that if he had not participated, somebody else would have done it anyway. Steve Kroft: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson. Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews. George Soros: Yes. That’s right. Yes. Steve Kroft: That sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult? George Soros: No, not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t–you don’t see the connection. But it created no problem at all. Steve Kroft: No feeling of guilt? George Soros: No. Steve Kroft: For example that, ‘I’m Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.’ None of that? George Soros: Well, of course I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in markets–that if I weren’t there–of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would–would–would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the–whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the–I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.” In A separate interview Soros said that when he was in charge of confiscating land from the Jews in Nazi occupied Hungry it was the "happiest time of my life". of course he was 14, assisting the person who was his guardian, and it was property, not life. I could see if he felt this way about gassing people, or shooting them down. But in context, it is akin to if deportation of law abiding immigrant children were someday deemed a horrific human rights violation ... If you would ask those whose job it is now in thirty years if they felt bad about it(let alone if they were teens doing that 'job') Im sure they would have a clear conscience, because it was the law at the time and the culture where they would have no reason to think it would not be done, in accordance with law at the time, with or without them with perhaps what was some type of cultural socioeconomic justification at the time. In any case, he has done plenty of charity since giving out more than he could have ever participated in taking. how did he get rich as a teenager? Its like saying my son got rich by working at taco bell as a teen. They had to pay him, but he wasnt the one making any significant financial gain. I also don't compare the theft of property with the dehumanizing of a person into property. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 11/25/17 08:39 AM
|
|
Soros was born in 1930, Hitler committed suicide in 1945
as I said above he was only a TEENAGER, younger than 15, and under the care and authority of a guardian following the only laws he had known to confiscate property that the culture deemed was not the right of jews to have, just like our culture feels its not the right of 'illegal' immigrants to have residence I don't know how any teen had authority to send people to death camps nor did I read in the OP interview anything about him being involved in that part he is now 87 years old I doubt that he became a RICH teen just following the law and his guardians orders and whatever wealth he acquired in the 67 YEARS since he was last a teen, he used to do plenty of good and help plenty of people my mind is not one track, its realistic and logical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK.... I've had my laugh for the day. I can leave now.
Hi all! Just passing thru on my way to reality. Thought I'd stop by the ward and check on our favorite patients. Seems much more therapy is needed and nothing much changes. Note to self: check the crayon supply drawer in the safe space and the insulation in the scream room It's sad. So very sad indeed 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK.... I've had my laugh for the day. I can leave now. Hi all! Just passing thru on my way to reality. Thought I'd stop by the ward and check on our favorite patients. Seems much more therapy is needed and nothing much changes. Note to self: check the crayon supply drawer in the safe space and the insulation in the scream room It's sad. So very sad indeed
Yes we tend to be seriously funny. 
|
|
|
|
|
