A bill recently introduced in Texas seeks to obliterate the Federal Reserve's much-maligned monopoly on currency by establishing gold and silver as legal tender — but the groundbreaking legislation, if passed, would also prohibit those precious metals from being seized by State authorities.

If passed, Texans would secure stability by reclaiming their purchasing power — without being subject to the whims of The Fed — an institution widely regarded as a devious manipulator of currencies and markets.

Senator Bob Hall introduced the bill last month, which, the Tenth Amendment Center explains, "declares specifically that certain gold and silver coins are legal tender, and prohibits any tax, charge, assessment, fee, or penalty on any exchange of Federal Reserve notes (dollars) for gold or silver. The bill authorizes the payment of taxes and fees in gold & silver in certain circumstances. It would also prohibit the seizure of gold or silver by state authorities."

Further subverting the current economy's fealty to Dr. Ron Paul's Enemy Number One, SB 2097, as the legislation is better known, would prevent any contracts explicitly to be paid in silver or gold to be instead paid with Federal Reserve notes — if you agree to pay in precious coins, you cannot then proffer payment in dollars.

Enforcing such contracts legally, the Tenth Amendment Center notes, would encourage their proliferation — and that of gold and silver coinage.

Constitutional tender expert, William Greene, agrees. He explained,

"Over time, as residents of the state use both Federal Reserve notes and silver and gold coins, the fact that the coins hold their value more than Federal Reserve notes do will lead to a 'reverse Gresham's Law' effect, where good money (gold and silver coins) will drive out bad money (Federal Reserve notes). As this happens, a cascade of events can begin to occur, including the flow of real wealth toward the state's treasury, an influx of banking business from outside of the state - as people in other states carry out their desire to bank with sound money - and an eventual outcry against the use of Federal Reserve notes for any transactions."

Texas law currently mandates all debts and taxes be paid in Federal Reserve Notes and coins issued by the Treasury — ironic, considering Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution states,

"No State shall ... make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts."

It wasn't until 1913, with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act — which only came after a concerted, covert campaign by U.S. banking magnates — that the loosely hybrid system placed massive control of money in the hands of Big Banks with little oversight from the government. But the 'central banking' system has failed to prevent further financial crises — and has been given even a greater chokehold and increased authority as compensation.

Additionally, fiat currency has become a monster issue — once gold no longer backed U.S. dollars beginning in 1971, excuses to just print more bills naturally multiplied.

Where the public has no voice in the value of Federal Reserve Notes, Texans — and any states to follow its lead — could theoretically eschew using dollars, altogether, in favor of payment in gold and silver coins.

As it stands, officials of the Federal Reserve — a private institution — make decisions behind closed doors, where collusion and corruption can easily sway opinion away from the public's, if not world's, best interests.

Notably, the most efficacious watchdog against such practices in any given industry —an independent audit — has never been required of The Fed.

"While the debasement of the currency is the result of federal policy and banker collusion, the effect is broad and deep," Tenth Amendment Center explains. "While there has been talk about reform, or at least an audit of the Fed, it is virtually a certainty that the federal government will never relinquish the power it enjoys through control of the monetary system. That said, there are practical steps that can be taken at the state level to promote the use and acceptance of sound money and undermine the Fed's monopoly on money."

If passed, Texas would join a smattering of states instituting sound money policies by returning gold and silver to a status as legitimate currency the metals have enjoyed throughout much of recorded history.

Last June, Texas paved the way for this new bill by establishing the first state-level gold depository, where an "account holder may transfer any portion of the balance of the holder's depository account by check, draft, or digital electronic instruction to another depository account holder or to a person who at the time the transfer is initiated is not a depository account holder."

Should lawmakers side with the financial interests of Texans and pass this legislation, Texas would join Utah, which began recognizing gold and silver coins issued by the United States as legal tender in 2011.

Comment: Arizona is also looking into gold:Arizona Senate Committee: Passes bill to treat gold like money, remove capital gains tax


http://thefreethoughtproject.com/texas-bill-gold-silver-money-federal-reserve/

Hmmm... so much for ..In God We Trust....now.. show us your silver and gold dust..
Lol

No .

I may show you my electroplating equipment tho .

as much as i like the idea i am pretty sure constitution prohibits states
from making their own money

------------------------------------
......
The Constitution contains only two sections dealing with monetary issues. Section 8 permits Congress to coin money and to regulate its value. Section 10 denies states the right to coin or to print their own money. The framers clearly intended a national monetary system based on coin and for the power to regulate that system to rest only with the federal government. The delegates at the Constitutional convention rejected a clause that would have given Congress the authority to issue paper money. They also rejected a measure that would have specifically denied that ability to the federal government (Hammond, 92). Although the Constitution does not state that the federal government has the power to print paper currency, the Supreme Court in McCulloch vs Maryland (1819) ruled unanimously that the Second Bank of the United States and the banknotes it issued on behalf of the federal government were Constitutional. .....

http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/essays/general/a-brief-history-of-central-banking/money-and-the-constitution.php

Yeah, plus, one of the big reasons we left the idea of people making their own cash like that, is that it causes the value of the money used to vacillate with the market price of the metals it is made from. And those prices are NOT stable at all.

Frankly, it sounds like typical pandering to a certain deluded voting block in that state, who pine for the romance of an old west that actually never was as wonderful as they imagine.

Arizona and Utah are already doing it...

i think it has more to do with getting the snowflake liberals out of our state...

Adios Libtards.

we would probably make the day when the last libtard leaves a state holiday...

Ah, I see. This thread has nothing to do with discussing momentary policy, it's just a mutual insult festival for a certain small group.

Carry on.

"Momentary policy? Is that Libtard speak?