Topic: Trump won't concede | |
---|---|
How can you concede to someone who should be in prison?
|
|
|
|
How can you concede to someone who should be in prison? Got that right! |
|
|
|
How can you concede to someone who should be in prison? because 'should be' and actually proven guilty are different things, and americans VOTE based upon whom they think should be in office with a vote that is respected as part of a DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC |
|
|
|
It doesn't make me wonder. It makes me angry.
|
|
|
|
Dead People Registering? Examples of Voter Fraud in Key Swing States The Trump campaign is asking its supporters to keep an eye out for possible cases of voter fraud on Election Day. So what are they concerned about specifically? On Fox & Friends today Kelly Riddell, The Washington Times deputy opinion editor, shed some light on actual instances of voter fraud - like dead people casting votes - in key swing states. In Harrisonburg, Virginia, the FBI and local authorities are investigating after 20 dead people re-registered to vote this year. Also, a study found more than 1,000 non-citizens in Virginia are registered to vote. Riddell pointed out that the study did not even include Fairfax County and Arlington County, areas of northern Virginia which drive Democrat votes. In Pennsylvania, Riddell said more than 43,000 voters may be registered twice while the secretary of state there said more than 700 Pennsylvania voters might have cast two ballots in recent elections. The issue of voter fraud has taken center stage this week after Donald Trump declared at a debate that he will wait until Election Day before deciding whether to accept the election results. On top of that, Project Veritas has released a video - viewed more than 3.1 million times - showing Democratic operatives apparently talking about taking advantage of lax voter registration policies. http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/21/dead-people-registering-reporter-lays-out-examples-voter-fraud-swing-states |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 10/22/16 12:20 PM
|
|
How can you concede to someone who should be in prison? because 'should be' and actually proven guilty are different things, and americans VOTE based upon whom they think should be in office with a vote that is respected as part of a DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC You mean like her admitting guilt (oh, and btw, she's done that too!)? Because otherwise is has been proven pretty clearly when you remove the double standard and WH influence on the investigation to protect POTUS! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How can you concede to someone who should be in prison? because 'should be' and actually proven guilty are different things, and americans VOTE based upon whom they think should be in office with a vote that is respected as part of a DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC You mean like her admitting guilt (oh, and btw, she's done that too!)? Because otherwise is has been proven pretty clearly when you remove the double standard and WH influence on the investigation to protect POTUS! Nnnnno. You have your facts mixed with wishful thinking again. She did not "admit guilt." I can't figure out what you even think you were saying with the "Because otherwise is has been proven pretty clearly when you remove the double standard and WH influence on the investigation to protect POTUS!" ramble. There's no grammatical format to organize it into a recognizable sentence. |
|
|
|
Because he doesn't have to???
|
|
|
|
everything she has done does matter, because amongst the PLENTY of things she has done she has made mistakes Oh? What 'everything' has she done? |
|
|
|
I demand a Recount of the recounted Recount! OwlGore yes it is funny how the new presidents relatives decided the election. |
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Sun 10/23/16 08:06 PM
|
|
She did not "admit guilt." Why would she apologize like any other criminal for her mistake if that is not an admission of guilt? http://www.statenation.co/hstr.html Need to hear it for yourself? Explain how you feel that is not admitssion of guilt? My question is how on earth can anyone sanction a 'criminal' for president? |
|
|
|
everything she has done does matter, because amongst the PLENTY of things she has done she has made mistakes Oh? What 'everything' has she done? worked as family advocate for children in childrens defense group worked as family advocate for children in advocate group she founded worked to get healthcare for children worked to get educational services come to the homes of houseridden children worked to make sure women in the business of law were not discriminated against ALL BEFORE SHE OR HER HUSBAND WERE POLITICIANS and after Bill entered the foray she worked to get medical insurance for children she worked to get family leave extended for families of the guard she worked to secure money to rebuild ground zero ,,,,,public service/caring about others, MOST HER LIFE thats 'part' of the 'ALL' ,,, comparatively, in the field of public service what 'all' has Trump done (with all the resources he was BORN into even)? |
|
|
|
She did not "admit guilt." Why would she apologize like any other criminal for her mistake if that is not an admission of guilt? http://www.statenation.co/hstr.html Need to hear it for yourself? Explain how you feel that is not admitssion of guilt? My question is how on earth can anyone sanction a 'criminal' for president? taking responsibility for an error and admitting 'guilt' of a crime are far from the same thing,,, |
|
|
|
Jon McKeone
With the repeatedly exposed criminality of the democrats to win at any cost only a complete moron would blindly agree to accept the results without question. Scott Campbell Why should we consent, after the fact, to that which is imposed on us through lies, criminality and violence? Principles must be reciprocated. |
|
|
|
Edited by
RebelArcher
on
Mon 10/24/16 08:27 AM
|
|
taking responsibility for an error and admitting 'guilt' of a crime are far from the same thing,,,
Cha-ching...someone just made another .04 from CTR..... |
|
|
|
Rigged Elections?!?
OH no! Who ever heard of such a thing? |
|
|
|
Edited by
alleoops
on
Mon 10/24/16 10:00 AM
|
|
How can you concede to someone who should be in prison? |
|
|
|
Trump should have gone out and say it clearly in the last debate instead of pµssy-footing around the question: "...what was that, Chris...? OH, her rigging the elections? No doubt in my mind... Contest it? You bet I'll contest it. Chris, we're going to be mired in contested elections proceedings from this Christmas to the next, and beyond until SHE concedes." That's what I waiting for Trump to say.
Halas, he didn't say so he won't get my vote |
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Mon 10/24/16 03:20 PM
|
|
everything she has done does matter, because amongst the PLENTY of things she has done she has made mistakes Oh? What 'everything' has she done? worked as family advocate for children in childrens defense group worked as family advocate for children in advocate group she founded worked to get healthcare for children worked to get educational services come to the homes of houseridden children worked to make sure women in the business of law were not discriminated against ALL BEFORE SHE OR HER HUSBAND WERE POLITICIANS and after Bill entered the foray she worked to get medical insurance for children she worked to get family leave extended for families of the guard she worked to secure money to rebuild ground zero ,,,,,public service/caring about others, MOST HER LIFE thats 'part' of the 'ALL' ,,, comparatively, in the field of public service what 'all' has Trump done (with all the resources he was BORN into even)? But I am not asking for soapbox rhetoric k, I am asking for hard facts exactly what she has done. Anyone can set up a club and say they did all sorts of wonderful things, it does not mean they did anything at all. So I am asking you what she has done? The facts not the soapbox rhetoric, (aside from being a psychopathic liar, that we already know. |
|
|