100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Do we really want to go there again? | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Wed 08/10/16 08:02 AM
|
|
Do we really want to go there again?
I don't know. I feel like the closer we get to November I'm trapped in a haunted house. I open one door, there's michael myers, so I run to the other door, and there's jason voorhees, I turn around, myers, turn around, jason. There's no escape and the terror keeps closing in, with nowhere else to go. Go there again? There's no way not to go someplace horrible. fact check them and research the subject matter
I did... I don't think you did. The OP is copied and pasted from other sites, and no source is given even though highlighting and searching any section comes up with lots of links. And a lot of what is in the OP is not fact, convenient interpretation of events, and/or just plain manipulation turning irrelevant things into something nefarious. I mean "Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh" No, she didn't. The FBI came up with a plan, Janet Reno approved it. As written it seems like Janet Reno made some kind of plan, and presented it to the FBI, as though the FBI are just sitting around waiting to be told what to do and how to do it. That's not how it works. so,since Reno signed off and approved the Plan,I'd think it would be her responsibility! Hers and slick Willie's who went on National Television before the Raid and called Koresh insane! There were numerous occasions where they could have arrested Koresh,without any harm to the rest of the Branch-Davidians,but I guess that didn't satisfy the FBI-,and DELTA-Cowboys! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I mean "Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh"
No, she didn't. The FBI came up with a plan, Janet Reno approved it. As written it seems like Janet Reno made some kind of plan, and presented it to the FBI, as though the FBI are just sitting around waiting to be told what to do and how to do it. That's not how it works ''Atty. Gen. Janet Reno on Tuesday vigorously defended her decision in 1993 to approve a tear-gas assault on the Branch Davidian compound near Waco, Tex."" http://articles.latimes.com/1995-08-02/news/mn-30642_1_tear-gas-attack Now please do the right thing and admit how wrong you were. I'll admit, I won't be holding my breath. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do we really want to go there again?
I don't know. I feel like the closer we get to November I'm trapped in a haunted house. I open one door, there's michael myers, so I run to the other door, and there's jason voorhees, I turn around, myers, turn around, jason. There's no escape and the terror keeps closing in, with nowhere else to go. Go there again? There's no way not to go someplace horrible. fact check them and research the subject matter
I did... I don't think you did. The OP is copied and pasted from other sites, and no source is given even though highlighting and searching any section comes up with lots of links. And a lot of what is in the OP is not fact, convenient interpretation of events, and/or just plain manipulation turning irrelevant things into something nefarious. I mean "Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh" No, she didn't. The FBI came up with a plan, Janet Reno approved it. As written it seems like Janet Reno made some kind of plan, and presented it to the FBI, as though the FBI are just sitting around waiting to be told what to do and how to do it. That's not how it works. so,since Reno signed off and approved the Plan,I'd think it would be her responsibility! Hers and slick Willie's who went on National Television before the Raid and called Koresh insane! There were numerous occasions where they could have arrested Koresh,without any harm to the rest of the Branch-Davidians,but I guess that didn't satisfy the FBI-,and DELTA-Force-Cowboys! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMG!
Do you really want to go there and have THIS as your next First Lady? 
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some of that opening list is valid and correct, and some of it isn't. The parts that are accurate are enough to withhold praise and votes in favor of Clinton.
But I am all about accuracy, and factuality, so I do think it's important NOT to lie and exaggerate what each of the Clintons did and didn't do. If nothing else, THE biggest reason why the Republicans are having trouble convincing the mass of the electorate not to choose Hillary, is because they DO spend to much time and effort lying and exaggerating. If you want to defeat a politician, the LAST thing to do, is to lie about them. The reason why Clinton CAN get by with simply saying "Look! There they go again!" is because the Republicans keep indulging in this kind of mixing lies with facts. So I suggest that everyone who does want to oppose Clinton, review this list, and take out the false parts, and the items where you are trying to blame Clinton for results which would clearly have happened no matter who was in charge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's the repubs real problem..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Wed 08/10/16 02:24 PM
|
|
Some of that opening list is valid and correct, and some of it isn't. The parts that are accurate are enough to withhold praise and votes in favor of Clinton. But I am all about accuracy, and factuality, so I do think it's important NOT to lie and exaggerate what each of the Clintons did and didn't do. If nothing else, THE biggest reason why the Republicans are having trouble convincing the mass of the electorate not to choose Hillary, is because they DO spend to much time and effort lying and exaggerating. If you want to defeat a politician, the LAST thing to do, is to lie about them. The reason why Clinton CAN get by with simply saying "Look! There they go again!" is because the Republicans keep indulging in this kind of mixing lies with facts. So I suggest that everyone who does want to oppose Clinton, review this list, and take out the false parts, and the items where you are trying to blame Clinton for results which would clearly have happened no matter who was in charge. Provided you had an impartial MSM! And according to the Clintonites,Hisslery is truthful and can do no wrong,and generally is as "Clean as fabric washed in Persil"! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's the repubs real problem..... Amen! The media use to talk about Trumps"free media" but now the mainstream media is actually working for the Clinton campaign. Twisting everything Trump says and not covering all of Hillary's incompetency, frailty, corruption and criminal activities. Protecting one of their own 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amen!
What's funny....or rather, sad, is that some of the outlets are shameless in their bias.
The media use to talk about Trumps"free media" but now the mainstream media is actually working for the Clinton campaign. Twisting everything Trump says and not covering all of Hillary's incompetency, frailty, corruption and criminal activities. Protecting one of their own Takes the whole fake "Trump said he wants 2a people to kill Hillary" narrative, for example..... ""(Reuters) - A federal official on Wednesday said the U.S. Secret Service had not formally spoken with Republican Donald Trump's presidential campaign regarding his suggestion a day earlier that gun rights activists could stop Democratic rival Hillary Clinton from curtailing their access to firearms. Following Trump's comment at a rally on Tuesday in which he suggested that gun rights activists could stop Clinton from appointing liberal anti-gun justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, a federal official familiar with the matter told Reuters that there had been no formal conversations between the Secret Service and the Trump campaign. Earlier CNN had reported that there had been multiple conversations between the campaign and the agency."" http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN10L29W They don't even attempt to hide it anymore....just lie and roll with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Thu 08/11/16 07:40 AM
|
|
Amen!
What's funny....or rather, sad, is that some of the outlets are shameless in their bias.
The media use to talk about Trumps"free media" but now the mainstream media is actually working for the Clinton campaign. Twisting everything Trump says and not covering all of Hillary's incompetency, frailty, corruption and criminal activities. Protecting one of their own Takes the whole fake "Trump said he wants 2a people to kill Hillary" narrative, for example..... ""(Reuters) - A federal official on Wednesday said the U.S. Secret Service had not formally spoken with Republican Donald Trump's presidential campaign regarding his suggestion a day earlier that gun rights activists could stop Democratic rival Hillary Clinton from curtailing their access to firearms. Following Trump's comment at a rally on Tuesday in which he suggested that gun rights activists could stop Clinton from appointing liberal anti-gun justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, a federal official familiar with the matter told Reuters that there had been no formal conversations between the Secret Service and the Trump campaign. Earlier CNN had reported that there had been multiple conversations between the campaign and the agency."" http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN10L29W They don't even attempt to hide it anymore....just lie and roll with it. And the same goes Double for the Clinton News Network! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amen!
What's funny....or rather, sad, is that some of the outlets are shameless in their bias.
The media use to talk about Trumps"free media" but now the mainstream media is actually working for the Clinton campaign. Twisting everything Trump says and not covering all of Hillary's incompetency, frailty, corruption and criminal activities. Protecting one of their own Takes the whole fake "Trump said he wants 2a people to kill Hillary" narrative, for example..... ""(Reuters) - A federal official on Wednesday said the U.S. Secret Service had not formally spoken with Republican Donald Trump's presidential campaign regarding his suggestion a day earlier that gun rights activists could stop Democratic rival Hillary Clinton from curtailing their access to firearms. Following Trump's comment at a rally on Tuesday in which he suggested that gun rights activists could stop Clinton from appointing liberal anti-gun justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, a federal official familiar with the matter told Reuters that there had been no formal conversations between the Secret Service and the Trump campaign. Earlier CNN had reported that there had been multiple conversations between the campaign and the agency."" http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN10L29W They don't even attempt to hide it anymore....just lie and roll with it. And the same goes Double for the Clinton News Network! Yep Clinton News Network has really gone overboard...It is really sick just watching it. I think because Trump called them out directly and now he won't do interviews with them...their ratings have tumbled big time since 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some of that opening list is valid and correct, and some of it isn't. The parts that are accurate are enough to withhold praise and votes in favor of Clinton. But I am all about accuracy, and factuality, so I do think it's important NOT to lie and exaggerate what each of the Clintons did and didn't do. If nothing else, THE biggest reason why the Republicans are having trouble convincing the mass of the electorate not to choose Hillary, is because they DO spend to much time and effort lying and exaggerating. If you want to defeat a politician, the LAST thing to do, is to lie about them. The reason why Clinton CAN get by with simply saying "Look! There they go again!" is because the Republicans keep indulging in this kind of mixing lies with facts. So I suggest that everyone who does want to oppose Clinton, review this list, and take out the false parts, and the items where you are trying to blame Clinton for results which would clearly have happened no matter who was in charge. Provided you had an impartial MSM! And according to the Clintonites,Hisslery is truthful and can do no wrong,and generally is as "Clean as fabric washed in Persil"! Isn't it a bit of a contradiction to complain about the lack of "an impartial MSM," when you can't bring yourself to spell a name correctly? |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Thu 08/11/16 06:20 PM
|
it seems in politics neither side can claim clean hands, they both posture and pick and choose their facts to align with whether they support or oppose someone the news needs sponsors, and an audience, and if the audience doesnt tune in they adapt programming to what their audience wants to tune in to ,the MEDIA is a reflection of the public and the public feeds off the media,, there is enough responsibility to go around |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it seems in politics neither side can claim clean hands, they both posture and pick and choose their facts to align with whether they support or oppose someone
the news needs sponsors, and an audience, and if the audience doesnt tune in they adapt programming to what their audience wants to tune in to ,the MEDIA is a reflection of the public and the public feeds off the media,, there is enough responsibility to go around 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some of that opening list is valid and correct, and some of it isn't. The parts that are accurate are enough to withhold praise and votes in favor of Clinton. But I am all about accuracy, and factuality, so I do think it's important NOT to lie and exaggerate what each of the Clintons did and didn't do. If nothing else, THE biggest reason why the Republicans are having trouble convincing the mass of the electorate not to choose Hillary, is because they DO spend to much time and effort lying and exaggerating. If you want to defeat a politician, the LAST thing to do, is to lie about them. The reason why Clinton CAN get by with simply saying "Look! There they go again!" is because the Republicans keep indulging in this kind of mixing lies with facts. So I suggest that everyone who does want to oppose Clinton, review this list, and take out the false parts, and the items where you are trying to blame Clinton for results which would clearly have happened no matter who was in charge. Provided you had an impartial MSM! And according to the Clintonites,Hisslery is truthful and can do no wrong,and generally is as "Clean as fabric washed in Persil"! Isn't it a bit of a contradiction to complain about the lack of "an impartial MSM," when you can't bring yourself to spell a name correctly? appropriate for that Snake In The Grass,besides,I am not part of the MSM-Establisment!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it seems in politics neither side can claim clean hands, they both posture and pick and choose their facts to align with whether they support or oppose someone
the news needs sponsors, and an audience, and if the audience doesnt tune in they adapt programming to what their audience wants to tune in to ,the MEDIA is a reflection of the public and the public feeds off the media,, there is enough responsibility to go around
WHO is on First? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMG! Do you really want to go there and have THIS as your next First Lady?
scares me every time I look at THAT! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scares me when I see this,,lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is even scarier ...now medical experts say she might have brain damage 
|
|
|
|
|
