100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: Uh-Oh: Newly Released Email Was Marked Classified | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Uh-Oh: Newly Released Email Was Marked Classified When It Hit Clinton's Server Hillary Clinton has claimed from the very beginning of the email scandal that nothing she sent or received was marked classified at the time. As recently as Wednesday of this week, she told Fox News' Bret Baier, "nothing that I sent or received was marked classified. And nothing has been demonstrated to contradict that. So it is the fact. It was the fact when I first said it. It is the fact that I’m saying it now." Unfortunately for Hillary, the State Department today released an email from 2012 that totally contradicts her "fact." According to Catherine Herridge at Fox News, the email carries "a classified code known as a 'portion marking' - and that marking was on the email when it was sent directly to Clinton’s account." (Not retroactively, as the Clinton camp likes to claim.) http://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/06/10/uh-oh-newly-released-email-was-marked-classified-when-it-hit-clintons-server/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yet That Thing might still end up POTUS!
Pardoned by That Other Thing of all Criminal Actions and other Misdeeds! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like the HuffPO is betting on the other liberal horse in the race... Hillary Clinton’s Private Server Contained Special Access Program Intelligence. Bernie Sanders Must Continue to Campaign Clinton’s convenience narrative is almost certainly an outright lie. Since Clinton stored SAP intelligence and other classified documents on an unguarded server (without permission), Espionage Act indictments are likely, as I explain in the following YouTube segment. We’re still in the first inning of a long ballgame pertaining to the FBI’s investigation. Nobody has won anything officially, so the Democratic Party must wait until the FBI shares its findings with the public. If it recommends indictments, and the likelihood is extremely high based upon a number of factors, then the DNC will need Bernie Sanders. Ignoring this obvious fact could lead to a Trump presidency, so Bernie Sanders, and the Democratic Party, must stay patient. When the media finally focuses upon Clinton’s SAP emails and the FBI’s reaction to this security breach, Bernie Sanders will become Democratic nominee in 2016. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/hillary-clintons-private-_b_10354484.html?yptr=yahoo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
you mean Fauxcahontas,Boinie and the Brainless Wonder could be entering the Race?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 06/11/16 09:31 AM
|
|
It should be a big deal..... the first woman nominee for the presidency.... but with Clinton in that role there seems to be little to celebrate or commemorate about. Warren has her good points but in endorsing Clinton, and perhaps being interested or considered for her running mate, takes tons from her credibility! With the world in the shape it's in under 2 terms of Obozo I think even the liberals will have a problem voting for Clinton to take the helm, and would be hard pressed to trust a ticket with Clinton and Warren (a newbie senator with no real experience at anything but opening her mouth) to run things..... Even with Clinton's scandals aside Not meaning to seem or be a misogynist here. Lord knows the last few decades of male leadership have really screwed things up, but I think there is too much chaos in the world for many to take such a ticket seriously.... as Clinton's failure to bury Bernie on what was supposed to be her unchallenged coronation has shown. Trump has his issues too, but nobody wants 4 or more years of continued Oblowme policy failures. 75% have stated that the country is headed the wrong direction. Clinton offers nothing to change that direction other than her history of failed policies, corruption, and pay to play politics. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It should be a big deal..... the first woman nominee for the presidency.... but with Clinton in that role there seems to be little to celebrate or commemorate about. Warren has her good points but in endorsing Clinton, and perhaps being interested or considered for her running mate, takes tons from her credibility! With the world in the shape it's in under 2 terms of Obozo I think even the liberals will have a problem voting for Clinton to take the helm, and would be hard pressed to trust a ticket with Clinton and Warren (a newbie senator with no real experience at anything but opening her mouth) to run things..... Even with Clinton's scandals aside Not meaning to seem or be a misogynist here. Lord knows the last few decades of male leadership have really screwed things up, but I think there is too much chaos in the world for many to take such a ticket seriously.... as Clinton's failure to bury Bernie on what was supposed to be her unchallenged coronation has shown. Trump has his issues too, but nobody wants 4 or more years of continued Oblowme policy failures. 75% have stated that the country is headed the wrong direction. Clinton offers nothing to change that direction other than her history of failed policies, corruption, and pay to play politics. not the first woman nominee... look up 1872... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Woodhull |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It should be a big deal..... the first woman nominee for the presidency.... but with Clinton in that role there seems to be little to celebrate or commemorate about. Warren has her good points but in endorsing Clinton, and perhaps being interested or considered for her running mate, takes tons from her credibility! With the world in the shape it's in under 2 terms of Obozo I think even the liberals will have a problem voting for Clinton to take the helm, and would be hard pressed to trust a ticket with Clinton and Warren (a newbie senator with no real experience at anything but opening her mouth) to run things..... Even with Clinton's scandals aside Not meaning to seem or be a misogynist here. Lord knows the last few decades of male leadership have really screwed things up, but I think there is too much chaos in the world for many to take such a ticket seriously.... as Clinton's failure to bury Bernie on what was supposed to be her unchallenged coronation has shown. Trump has his issues too, but nobody wants 4 or more years of continued Oblowme policy failures. 75% have stated that the country is headed the wrong direction. Clinton offers nothing to change that direction other than her history of failed policies, corruption, and pay to play politics. not the first woman nominee... look up 1872... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Woodhull 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get a Bucket of water quick! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get a Bucket of water quick! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Sat 06/11/16 10:35 AM
|
|
get a Bucket of water quick!
that Bird-Dog! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 06/11/16 10:40 AM
|
|
get a Bucket of water quick!
You mean this one? 
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2014/08/bill-clinton-julie-tauber-mcmahon-gave-grant/ Can't blame him really..... Who in their right mind would want to do Hitlery? Now Melania Trump on the other hand...... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just can't understand why people are into this devil woman ...my brother voted for her...his reason was because of his mental illness he fears any cuts that will be made hurting the elderly and disabled...hmmm...so she cares..?...I told my bro that she's a lying sack of potatoes who will do nothing more than prance around like a queen lying and lining her pockets the entire time she's in office...but she's going to be president wether we want her or not...I just hope we the people rise against the corruption after they crown the snag...
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
RebelArcher
on
Sat 06/11/16 11:19 AM
|
|
get a Bucket of water quick!
You mean this one?
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2014/08/bill-clinton-julie-tauber-mcmahon-gave-grant/ Can't blame him really..... Who in their right mind would want to do Hitlery? Now Melania Trump on the other hand......
I'll admit...I'd drink a beer with him.....but I wouldn't leave my money on the bar when I went to take a leak. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She started out say NO classified material was received or sent via her private email.
She then clarified NO EMAILS MARKED classified was sent or received via her private email. Maybe she just took her "thoughts out of context" every time she has talked about those pesky emails. |
|
|
|
|
