Bob, bob, bob, BOB....

Did you read the two first lines of that post?
it was directed TO peaches.
Im not talking about *YOU*.
The fact that you missed that part leads me to question what condition you self concept really is.

"The way of a fool seems right to him, but a wise man listens to advice."

If you were TRULY open to advice you wouldnt jump to weak conclusions when given something like a site which unfortunatley gets stereotyped into the scam box/BS box.
Did you read my email?

read that letter.

So, if I WAS addressing you:
"The things I've done in life DO impress"
Do you state that in your interactions?
if you do, that may be interpreted by the women that you are trying to prove yourself /showing off.

"I AM funny."
Are you sure you come across as funny, or are you getting lumped as goofy?
because I checked out your profile and honestly I think the whole cats and dogs thing is random and reeks goofy humour.
Maybe thats just your sense of humour, but I used to use that style aswell and it constantly gets re-interpreted as nerdy.

me: "they TRY to be interesting"
you: "Few more interesting than I."

I dont understand your reply.

Me: "instead of trying SO HARD, why not NOT try at all?"
You: "That doesn't make any conceivable sense. If you want someone to say "hello" to you, the logical thing to do is to say "hello" first, so there's at least a 50-50 chance that the someone will say "hello" in return. If you want to meet girls and you don't try to meet them, what are you doing? Sitting back, being by yourself, and wasting time, that's what.
I've tried not trying. It was somehow even less successful than all my failed attempts at trying to try."

You've completely missed the message here, partly my fault in articulating as I can see how you got confused. When talking about TRYING Im talking about coming across as TRY HARD. Do you get me now?

Me: "This isnt a 'technique' or 'move' like some kind of strategy game"
You: "It's not a technique or move, but you have to learn it, huh? "

Way to go taking me out of context there! Why should I even reply to this one?


Me: "If I was wrong about this lack of self value ie: self esteem and security; why do guys TRY SO HARD?"
You: "Because attracting women has been one of the greatest conundrums to plague mankind ever since language was first developed and things got more complicated after you couldn't simply beat a woman over the head with a club and haul her into your cave."

Oh brother, if you just read that letter I think you'd recant this statement. PLEASE read that letter man!

Me: "If they REALLY felt VALUE they would think "I am worthy AS I AM to get womens attention.""
You: "That's exactly what I DO think, and I'm being accused of being a pretentious asshole because of it."

I dont know the situations where you're being "accused of being a pretentious asshole" so I cant say whether or not those accusations are going towards your selfconcept or something else like the way you are percieved.

Me; "problem is SO many guys have the WRONG concept of how to be attractive with women, this is what this guy teaches: HOW to BECOME (not memorize or learn techniques) the most attractive version of *YOURSELF*"
you: This guy has no idea who I am. What does he think he knows about *myself*?

See the top of this post.

Sorry, to clarify:

you: "The things I've done in life DO impress"
me: "Do you state that in your interactions?"

I dont mean ACTUALLY state that statement, I mean state things like (being overt here to get the message across):

"Well, I was TOP in class back at HARVARD and Im a CEO of a FORTUNE 500 company yadda yadda."

get me?

no wurries klc,
I want to be clear as day but it seems Im getting caught up in some kind of stereotypical, salesshark scamster Haze.