Topic: The "Primary" | |
---|---|
Who amongst all of the U.S. presidential candidates on both sides in your estimation will make it to the "primary?
|
|
|
|
Who amongst all of the U.S. presidential candidates on both sides in your estimation will make it to the "primary? suppose you give us your Estimate for a Change? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Probably gonna have a hard time to find him on any Ballot! |
|
|
|
Edited by
alnewman
on
Wed 12/23/15 03:11 PM
|
|
Never has a truer statement been made, well except perhaps: To Grover Cleveland: SIR, --- Your inaugural address is probably as honest, sensible, and consistent a one as that of any president within the last fifty years, or, perhaps, as any since the foundation of the government. If, therefore, it is false, absurd, self-contradictory, and ridiculous, it is not (as I think) because you are personally less honest, sensible, or consistent than your predecessors, but because the government itself --- according to your own description of it, and according to the practical administration of it for nearly a hundred years --- is an utterly and palpably false, absurd, and criminal one. Such praises as you bestow upon it are, therefore, necessarily false, absurd, and ridiculous. Thus you describe it as "a government pledged to do equal and exact justice to all men." Did you stop to think what that means? Evidently you did not; for nearly, or quite, all the rest of your address is in direct contradiction to it. Let me then remind you that justice is an immutable, natural principle; and not anything that can be made, unmade, or altered by any human power. It is also a subject of science, and is to be learned, like mathematics, or any other science. It does not derive its authority from the commands, will, pleasure, or discretion of any possible combination of men, whether calling themselves a government, or by any other name.
Lysander Spooner, A letter to Grover Cleveland. |
|
|
|
Who amongst all of the U.S. presidential candidates on both sides in your estimation will make it to the "primary? Uhhhh... Forrest, the candidates are in the "primaries" now. General election is November, 2016. |
|
|
|
Who amongst all of the U.S. presidential candidates on both sides in your estimation will make it to the "primary? Uhhhh... Forrest, the candidates are in the "primaries" now. General election is November, 2016. Duh, |
|
|
|
the question was about THE primary
Primary: a preliminary election to appoint delegates to a party conference or to select the candidates for a principal, especially presidential, election the election has not been held,,,nothing was wrong with the question to answer the op, Sadly, I believe our alleged billionaire clown will get the republicans nomination and I believe Clinton or Sanders will get the democratic nomination |
|
|
|
the question was about THE primary Primary: a preliminary election to appoint delegates to a party conference or to select the candidates for a principal, especially presidential, election the election has not been held,,,nothing was wrong with the question to answer the op, Sadly, I believe our alleged billionaire clown will get the republicans nomination and I believe Clinton or Sanders will get the democratic nomination neither much good for America! |
|
|
|
some more terrible for America than others
|
|
|
|
some more terrible for America than others
|
|
|
|
some more terrible for America than others what you Guys need is Louie "The Fiddler" Wolcott! |
|
|
|
some more terrible for America than others what you Guys need is Louie "The Fiddler" Wolcott! well if people can vote TRUMP,, IM sure Farrakhan would have a shot too but whereas trump owns up to his alignment towards rich white males or attractive white females Farrakhans type of partiality, towards minorities, is not as electable,, |
|
|
|
the question was about THE primary Primary: a preliminary election to appoint delegates to a party conference or to select the candidates for a principal, especially presidential, election the election has not been held,,,nothing was wrong with the question to answer the op, Sadly, I believe our alleged billionaire clown will get the republicans nomination and I believe Clinton or Sanders will get the democratic nomination Then the answer would have to be, all of them. |
|
|
|
Who amongst all of the U.S. presidential candidates on both sides in your estimation will make it to the "primary? Uhhhh... Forrest, the candidates are in the "primaries" now. General election is November, 2016. |
|
|
|
lets not make fun of things we aren't sure of,,,
a primary 'election' picks the candidate currently those interested with the money have thrown in their name but no one has elected them to anything the general election will be AFTER the primary elections , when those nominated in the latter will run against each other,, |
|
|
|
You are not being politically correct
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 12/26/15 05:24 AM
|
|
Hitlery is too shrouded in controversy so I think Sanders will get the nomination for the Dums, but I don't think the voters, at least I hope, the Dum voters are smart enough to recognize the cost of Sanders "free stuff" he is promising and know enough about socialism (a lot of what they've been serving the last 7 years) to not elect him.
On the Reptile side, people like what Twerp is saying but they want someone else to carry the banner. I believe the Reptiles, since the voters won't give them another Bush, will either try to sell us an establishment Rubio...t or the young Kissinger padawan Cruz. Either way, nothing much will change and the establishment elitists will control still yet. The question is which masters we will serve... the banks, unions, and corporations, or the war machine, banks, and corporations. |
|
|
|
Hitlery is too shrouded in controversy so I think Sanders will get the nomination for the Dums, but I don't think the voters, at least I hope, the Dum voters are smart enough to recognize the cost of Sanders "free stuff" he is promising and know enough about socialism (a lot of what they've been serving the last 7 years) to not elect him. On the Reptile side, people like what Twerp is saying but they want someone else to carry the banner. I believe the Reptiles, since the voters won't give them another Bush, will either try to sell us an establishment Rubio...t or the young Kissinger padawan Cruz. Either way, nothing much will change and the establishment elitists will control still yet. The question is which masters we will serve... the banks, unions, and corporations, or the war machine, banks, and corporations. you mean to say,that Heads,Poison,Tails,Poison? |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 12/26/15 07:42 AM
|
|
Hitlery is too shrouded in controversy so I think Sanders will get the nomination for the Dums, but I don't think the voters, at least I hope, the Dum voters are smart enough to recognize the cost of Sanders "free stuff" he is promising and know enough about socialism (a lot of what they've been serving the last 7 years) to not elect him. On the Reptile side, people like what Twerp is saying but they want someone else to carry the banner. I believe the Reptiles, since the voters won't give them another Bush, will either try to sell us an establishment Rubio...t or the young Kissinger padawan Cruz. Either way, nothing much will change and the establishment elitists will control still yet. The question is which masters we will serve... the banks, unions, and corporations, or the war machine, banks, and corporations. you mean to say,that Heads,Poison,Tails,Poison? Sadly.... The lesser of two evils is still a terrible evil in this election |
|
|