Topic: FBI expands probe of Clinton emails | |
---|---|
FBI expands probe of Clinton emails, launches independent classification review http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/11/12/fbi-expands-probe-clinton-emails-launches-independent-classification-review/?vgnextrefresh=1&intcmp=hpbt1 |
|
|
|
i will be really surprised if anything happen to her
|
|
|
|
Barry and Lynch will have the last word!
|
|
|
|
Barry and Lynch will have the last word! and it will be a lie, as usual... |
|
|
|
but, will the voters believe them? Judging from the past, probably.
|
|
|
|
but, will the voters believe them? Judging from the past, probably. the voters don't have much to do with it, it's the electoral college that says who is president... |
|
|
|
Me thinks the FBI wants something to show for all this work they've supposedly done. By investigating the emails, and applying a little common sense, they'll want to know why something that wasn't classified a couple years ago suddenly becomes nuclear when Hillary leaves office.
They'll also want to see if tabs were scrubbed from e-mails. This way she can honestly claim there was no classified material marked as such when she handled it. IF her staff scrubs it, she reads it, sends it back and then THEY re-tab it, well she's off the hook right? Well not so fast. As a cabinet level employee who dealt with secret information all the time, she knows what she was reading was not for general consumption. If the stuff can't be put on the front page of the paper tomorrow, then it's classified. Well this sort of probe is what Martha Stewart got jailed on. If the FBI questions you, and not even under oath, the law can be used if they feel you caused them to incur extra costs and time investigating the case. IF you play with documents, coach people on how to answer questions, are evasive yourself, then the FBI has this tool. I guess it's one step below obstruction of justice. Useful for those white collar crimes where people hedge their bets by answering "I don't recall." If they find evidence you recalled just fine the day before they talked to you, well these |
|
|
|
but, will the voters believe them? Judging from the past, probably. the voters don't have much to do with it, it's the electoral college that says who is president... I've heard of this electoral college. Do they have a football team? |
|
|