The Fraternal Order of Police has a “surprise” in store for Quentin Tarantino.

Tarantino spoke out against police at an Oct. 24 rally, which was organized by a group called RiseUpOctober.

"I'm a human being with a conscience," Tarantino said at the rally. "And if you believe there's murder going on then you need to rise up and stand up against it. I'm here to say I'm on the side of the murdered."

Police unions across the country have vowed to boycott the director’s upcoming film, “The Hateful Eight.” Still, the director has refused to apologize for his comments, stating in an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, "I'm not being intimidated.”

Jim Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, told The Hollywood Reporter the group has something planned for the outspoken director.

"Something is in the works, but the element of surprise is the most important element," Pasco said. "Something could happen anytime between now and [the premiere of ‘The Hateful Eight’]. And a lot of it is going to be driven by Tarantino, who is nothing if not predictable.

"The right time and place will come up and we'll try to hurt him in the only way that seems to matter to him, and that's economically.”

Pasco clarified to The Hollywood Reporter that he was not threatening the “Django Unchained” director.

"Police officers protect people," he said. "They don't go out to hurt people."

The Fraternal Order of Police has more than 300,000 members.

Tarantino’s controversial comments have drawn attention from the media and Hollywood stars alike.

Actor Jamie Foxx, the star of his "Django Unchained," has backed Tarantino. At the Hollywood Film Awards, Foxx said: "Keep telling the truth and don't worry about none of the haters."

On Tuesday, the Weinstein Company, the longtime distributor of Tarantino's films including "Hateful Eight," said it does not speak for the director.

"The Weinstein Company has a longstanding relationship and friendship with Quentin and has a tremendous amount of respect for him as a filmmaker. We don't speak for Quentin, he can and should be allowed to speak for himself," a Weinstein Company spokesperson told FOX411.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2015/11/06/fraternal-order-police-planning-surprise-for-quentin-tarantino/?intcmp=hpff

I sure hope he never gets pulled over for speeding and expects a break from the officer.

"Police officers protect people," he said. "They don't go out to hurt people."



"The right time and place will come up and we'll try to hurt him in the only way that seems to matter to him, and that's economically.”



lol. what a group of pansy hypocrites,,,

at least QT is getting plenty of advertising for his new movie...

haa, too true

I havent seen an advertisement or trailer yet,, perhaps this WILL be all the advertising he needs?

and it didn't cost him a dime..

http://www.wendymcelroy.com/news.php?extend.3742.10

The police 'protect and serve' the state, not you

In 1856, the U.S. Supreme Court (South v. Maryland) found that law enforcement officers had no duty to protect any individual. Their duty is to enforce the law in general. More recently, in 1982 (Bowers v. DeVito), the Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit held, "...there is no Constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen. It is monstrous if the state fails to protect its residents... but it does not violate... the Constitution." Later court decisions concurred: the police have no duty to protect you.

kind of obvious in their actions

honestly, there is too much crime to expect them a 'duty' to protect every individual

they have plenty of 'discretion' in deciding in what situations they serve 'justice' and what situations they give 'breaks' or 'warnings',, or just look the other way at a different crime,,,

I will predict that the cops will try to prevent people from reaching the theatre on premiere night simply by directing traffic around the venue such that the 'stars' will maybe have to walk a couple blocks to get to the venue.

Being mobbed for autographs by film fans, they may need the cops (or more likely their bodyguards) to 'make a hole' in the crowd to get them to the theatre in time to do interviews, etc.

I would also suggest they'll block access to nearby parking facilities and will threaten to ticket and arrest limo drivers who try to stop and let people get out of their cars while on the street. Claims of impeding traffic come to mind. Of course if I'm going to write the driver a ticket, EVERYONE has to stay in the car. I'll question each one of you individually. Did YOU ask the driver to let you out? Did he do it himself? Did you threaten him with his job if he didn't? The idea is the cop wants to know if it was a criminal conspiracy to stop the car, and thus he can lay additional charges. Interviews take time you see. So 6-8 people per limo? Hmmm. This could take a while.....

In addition, if theatres have paid duty cops for security, bet that anyone attending his movie will be forced to go through pat downs, electronic wanding, and will be told at the last second that cell phones will not be allowed in the theatre, thus forcing everyone to run back to their cars to dump them and then run back to avoid missing the movie.

Cops will happily mess with you for all kinds of reasons. Based on the number of theatre shootings do you think cops would be criticized for being 'extra safe'?

If I deny the rich and famous access to the venue and make them go around the block a couple times, do you think maybe some of them go home? All that has to happen is a cop claims to see a suspicious person, maybe with a gun, and we have to keep the place on lockdown. We wouldn't want QT getting shot in front of 50 cops right? How can he complain about his own safety?

So how does oh I dunno a 2 hour delay sound? We'll need to send in SWAT, the bomb squad, a couple dogs, maybe a HAZMAT team to test the air quality.... you get the idea. We can do this alllll daayyy Mr. Fancypants Hollywood Director. Still don't want to apologize?

Awwww,look, all TV trucks are leaving. That's a shame QT. I guess they have a deadline to meet. So sorry you couldn't have your red carpet interview recorded for posterity after banging back a couple Jagermeisters in the car.

Have a nice night!

yes,, and the trust in their integrity and public image will be done SO MUCH GOOD

after the idiots announce they 'planned' something to hurt the directors pocket

not careing that the director is not the only one whose living is affected by the movie, and not caring about consumer RIGHTS to be able to view the movies they choose,,,

,,,just digging thier image as pricks even bigger

and probably increasing the CONSUMERS resolve to make SURE they see the movie,,,,

hopefully the NON pricks amongst them wont allow it to happen,,,

,,but we will see

He's pretty much the only guy they can do anything against.

He's a middle aged white guy with no real political or budget power over them.

They attack him they can't be called racist or anything, and there's no real blow back.

What, are cops going to start being portrayed negatively in films?
Incompetent, corrupt, abusive, things like that?

they ATTACK him and there is blowblack in terms of public image adn public trust,,,cause they arent going to be able to ATTACK him without also infringing upon a LOT of other people,,,,


it actually may REINFORCE the image of brutality

if they go through this trouble to 'hurt' someone with money for hurting their wittle feewings,,,

,, is it hard to believe they are BRUTAL to poor people who 'disrespect' or 'disobey' them?

It's always been easy to believe that cops treated inner city people like crap. The average middle class 'white guy' can go through his whole life and only meet a cop once or twice in his life for either a minor traffic infraction or a garage beak in. Rarely, does he confront a street cop, on the wrong side of town, at 2 am, so he has no frame of reference.

The stereotypical 'bad' police/public interface is seen as the arrogant white cop, dealing with a mouthy, angry, young black man, who in feeling that the police state has become oppressive, vents his anger. Cop gets pretty fed up in about 6 seconds, beats the kid down, and trumps up a charge to book him on. In the recent past, with the advent of personal video devices like cellphones, we can see this dynamic happen more often than we have seen it in the past.

The issue for most urban dwellers however is that the vast majority of urban police departments have a sizable rank and file of non-white officers and administrators. So why does this continue to happen?

Cops no longer 'act' white or black. They all 'act' blue. In so doing, both white and black cops have developed the Us vs Them mindset. In high crime areas, it's a character trait that cops see as a survival tool. Everyone is a danger unless they can prove otherwise.

Search YouTube for a recent video of Toronto TAVIS police intimidating a citizen who is trying to video an arrest of two others. They get right in his face, obstruct his attempts at filming, and want to try interrogating him. The person filming is clearly streetwise and refuses to get sucked into a confrontation.

The cops? Black. The person filming? Black. The neighborhood? Black. Well known in the city as drug and gang plagued. I grew up in that city and had great respect for the cops there. Now? After numerous brutality cases, bad shootings, and videos of unprofessional conduct, I don't.

well,ain't THAT special?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/07/quentin-tarantinos-anti-cop-comments-came-revolutionary-communist-rise-event/

Lost in the media’s reportage of Quentin Tarantino’s using rhetoric scripted by Black Lives Matter is the fact that the Rise Up October event at which Tarantino spoke was organized by revolutionary communists who advocate the armed overthrow of the United States of America.

In an article Thursday titled Quentin Tarantino Boycott Is a ‘Mafia-Style Protection Racket,’ Protest Organizer Says, TheWrap writes:

“It really is a Mafia-style protection racket thing, only the payoff is toeing the political line, not cash,” Carl Dix told TheWrap Thursday as he lashed out against the police groups threatening to boycott Tarantino’s upcoming western “The Hateful Eight.”

Who is Carl Dix, the protest organizer defending Tarantino and equating the police with the mafia?

Mr. Dix is one of the founding members of the Revolutionary Communist Party, a group that has held anti-police events in October for nearly two decades and that openly advocates for an armed overthrow of the United States of America.

In other words, Quentin Tarantino was not merely speaking at an event that was anti-police; he was an active, invited participant in a rally that is anti-military, anti-capitalist, and anti-American.

what Carl Dix stands for!

http://revcom.us/a/carldix/cd2.htm

Real Constitutionalists!

lol

rhetoric and communist in the same sentence


,,,delicious irony,,,

I wouldn't call a nationwide boycott free advertising.......

lmao@ nationwide boycott..

who is boycotting him? people that arent his fans anyway, people that dont see his movies any other time?

,,,ooh,,,

meanwhile, I have heard the name of his new movie ten times as much in these gripes than I have in any actual trailer on the television,,,

I bet it will be through this boycott. Their membership is several hundred thousand and when you add friends and family members it will definitely have an impact.

e is also been a strong supporter of the communist, anti American and anti Military group Code Pink and spoke out in support of that nut job Cindy Sheehan.

It's such good advertising that the production company that is owned by a vile anti cop socialist Weinstein has distanced themselves from Tarrantino, he even see's the blowback.

have you been speaking to him?....lol