100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Joe Biden's Team Met With DNC Officials This Week | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 10/14/15 05:39 AM
|
|
It seems Hitlery is having trouble keeping Wild Willie in line. Seems he told the press that Hitlery couldn't beat The Donald, not with the game he's playing.... and it's said Hitlery told him to keep his mouth shut and get to campaigning for her.....so which is it? He didn't mention Benghazi or the email fiasco but instead blamed it on Obama. Either way, despite all the efforts to declare Hitlery the nominee by the DNC and liberal press it seems they can't get enough support for Hitlery to fill a venue..... now Sanders the socialist on the other hand, can draw a crowd, but it seems attendees are going away confused about what he is offering. So while he is drawing crowds it somehow garners him little support. Biden would probably be the best nominee for the party because people at least might vote name recognition..... but he could NEVER win! OH GOD! Could we actually get stuck with The Donald as POTUS?!?! Please not a Cruz or Rubio either! And Graham the insane warmonger.....I'd leave the country! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
meanwhile in other News!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 10/14/15 01:58 PM
|
|
Guess Which Presidential Candidate Is Being Advised To Lawyer Up? http://www.americanpatriotdaily.com/featured/guess-which-presidential-candidate-is-being-advised-to-lawyer-up/ Jason Stapleton comments on the Dem debate...... "I don't think it would come as a shock to anyone if I said I was not at all excited about the debate last night. I didn't know two of the candidates, and the other three are less than inspiring to say the least. But I was hoping I'd hear something other than what I expected. Again, I was disappointed. I thought I'd hear a bunch of candidates talking about how they're going to tax the rich and provide more freebies and that's exactly what I got." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't watch the historic event myself. Did they talk about Social Security Disability fund or the national debt or even the on going investigation into Benghazi or illegal internet servers containing classified data? .....didn't think so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
meanwhile in other News!
That's why he'll never win. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well as long as Biden understands the 'machine' he's up against in the media, he can take a shot.
I had wondered why Bernie Sanders was getting minimal news coverage. You would always see his name in polling stories on CNN for example, but you never saw in depth coverage, live speeches for example, and even interviews with Bernie and his people. After the debate, the Sanders fans were going mental about CNN deleting their Facebook postings, and for 'sanitizing' the Facebook poll results saying Bernie had won the debate with 80%! Clinton was a distant second, and save for a quick screenshot of these 'results', CNN declared Clinton the winner. The Sanders followers had screenshots of their comments posted, and then almost as quickly being deleted by CNN. A cyberwar broke out with massive amounts of reposts being done, trying to get pro-Sanders comments to 'stick' on the site. Seems I was unaware of CNN's business connections to Hillary. We all know of course they love her, but I always wondered why the coverage was always so slanted as to the point of fabrication. Here's why. Time Warner owns Turner Broadcasting, which in turn owns CNN. Time Warner is apparently the 7th largest corporate contributor to the Clinton campaign. Thus CNN is just a wee bit compromised in the objectivity department. Are you really going to run stories and ask questions that would make the candidate your bosses are backing look bad? Can you say 'transferred to the Aleppo, Syria office'??? So the next time you see Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon, or Wolf Blitzer lob Hillary another softball, just remember it's like playing golf with your boss. Better if you let them get their way, than to lose your job. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Thu 10/15/15 12:41 AM
|
|
Meanwhile in the Twilight-Zone!
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/256885-michael-moore-sanders-won-the-dem-debate Documentary filmmaker Michael Moore said late Tuesday that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) won the first Democratic presidential debate. Chris Matthews nails it: Sanders won, he tweeted, echoing the MSNBC anchor's assessment of the event in Las Vegas. Never be4 @ a mainstream debate has a Prez candidate dared 2 question the core system of wealth & power, Moore said of Sanders's performance. History was made tonite: A conscientious objector running 4 Prez, who believes in democratic socialism, stood & spoke & was wildly applauded, he added. Moore praised Sanders's handling of both fiscal and racial issues. Seems now it's Bernie who is running Thrills up Chris' Leg!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
While I am certainly on your side in what logic you've presented here, pasting this "poster" that someone else made, just from a LOGIC aspect, more needs to be clarified. Back when Bush Jr was in charge, I had the same complaint after 911, when it was announced that the reason that our intelligence community had failed to prevent the disaster in spite of a number of advance warnings being given to them (including local FBI offices reporting to HQ that Middle Eastern men were taking flying lessons for jumbo jets, and only wanted to know how to fly, but not to either land or take off), was that the FBI in particular was deluged in data, and didn't have the ability to deal with it all... yet the Bush administrations solution was to be to increase even more data to them, but not expand their data-crunching capabilities. While I suspect that this was a matter of poor presentation, and/or typical biased/fear-mongering reporting, the logic was sound. Now as to Biden and gun laws: Is this a case where Biden ACTUALLY proposed that ADDITIONAL laws be passed, in spite of current laws not being enforced? That would be idiotic. Or is it a case where he proposed to pass replacement or enhancement laws, in order to make it POSSIBLE for existing laws to be enforced rationally? That would be intelligent. It's all in the details. Just for the record, I'm not a fan of Biden myself. He seems harmless enough, but hasn't shown any special inclination to lead, so he's not on my list of viable candidates. I just know that decisions made for the wrong reasons (such as political or personal bias) are always DESTRUCTIVE for the country. So I want factual and logically based decisions to be made instead. That's also why I oppose all name-calling and slander: not because I have delicate eyes and ears and can't take the childish obscenities, but because accepting them as valid discussion points as though they came from grownups, is bad for the nation. Have you ever looked for forums for Mensa? There must a forum some where suitable for your obvious high intellect. Judging from your comments here and on other post, you are not happy here. Good luck, hope you find something soon. 
Thanks for making it clear that you have nothing serious or factual to say. I will note that so that I don't mistake one of your joke posts for something worth any more than sniggering. |
|
|
|
|
