Topic: Iraq war officially recognized as a fraud and warcrime | |
---|---|
Funny how that Money was "mis-laid " by the Clinton-Admin! another 9/11-Myth! actually concerns Money from Fiscal Year 1999! Well I see another of your emotional outburst about another subject you know squat about. Myth, yeah sort of like all that missing money in Swiss banks stolen from the Jews by Hitler. No it was not about money from Fiscal year 1999, it was about a defense audit that occurred in fiscal 1999. The unaccounted funds would stretch back many years, say to 1993, maybe even before. But then why would you be concerned with facts, just declare it a myth. Coincidence it was 9/10 on the announcement, not really as there was something else about to happen on 9/11 from a financial perspective that sort of got destroyed at the world trade center and the pentagon. Amazing how $240 billion in bonds got cleared during Securities Exchange Act Section 12(k)"emergency powers". Seems like a lot of confusion helped a lot of matters just get cleared up. And imagine those planes and that missile knowing exactly where to strike. It is kind of hard to believe anything from a source that somehow believes any form of democracy is somehow deemed a republic, it isn't and it can't. But to go beyond the democracy and extoll the benefits of socialist benefits and declare that a means employed by a republic is pure diseased psyche. This country has many ills and diseases of its own without help from others that suffer the same diseases. So,why bring it in connection with 9/11 then? Since it wasn't the Bush-Admin who had lost the Funds,if they were even lost! Sorry, but if you do not understand at this point, never going to be, is it? And it is yourself that is claiming they were lost, not mine. They were never lost but few know just where they are and even less that actually care to find out. |
|
|
|
When you clicked on the link to this thread, you crossed over into ... |
|
|
|
Iraq war officially recognized as a fraud and warcrime OK.... it's offered by PMSNBC and Rancid Madcow....uh...you know, Obozos cheerleaders. One commenter even states: "Yet she has given a pass to her beloved Obombo and covers for him as he has continued Bush's war crimes at even expanded on them...Mentally deluded freak!" Not finding ANY of the evidence that we were told took us to war with Iraq, and cost us the lives of many of our children, blood, and treasure (over $3 Trillion.... my guess is much, much more) not to mention the toll to Iraq and its citizens.... look at the state it's in today! And remember the $2 Trillion found to be missing just days before 9/11 Rumsfeld told us about? Nothing more ever came of that. Funny how that works... All in all a good video tho... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJGIEU38S1w#t=1310 Funny how that Money was "mis-laid " by the Clinton-Admin! another 9/11-Myth! actually concerns Money from Fiscal Year 1999! Seems rather odd that the part of the Pentagon attacked was the "accounting" wing working on the missing money, the plane had to make an impossible turn to hit it when Rumsfeld's office was on a direct approach, and the side struck had just undergone re-inforcement upgrades as well. Not to mention that the floors of the tower struck were also record storage, attorney, and accounting floors as well. Rather strange coincidence don't you think? But saying so only makes me a CTer all Bunko! Guess he must have covered up for Clinton,since it was impossible that even that kind of Money was around,just seven months into his Gig!! http://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-the-pentagon-cannot-track-2-3-trillion-in-transactions.165/ So we go to another forum that uses a government dodge as the sole entry of claiming somehow to debunk something. And even that starts out by quoting some denier site. And if you had bothered to actually read the source, the presenters gets questioned and keeps running in circles about a source that ill backs his accusations. and you accuse others of Solipsism! There is an objective reality that is whether you believe in it or not. The irrationalists try to twist the natural world into their own social construct so they will use phrases like, "well, that's your opinion" when you are in fact stating an objective fact. Of course they are those people who create for themselves a little illusion of the world in their head. They will have a complex ideology and a dogmatic belief in it to make it appear real. They will scream and shout and be angry with anyone who threatens their view and they will resort to tactics like censorship and slander to silence those who speak an objective truth. Often large groups of such people will come together in a communal delusion. seems you haven't figured that out yet,regardless of your repeated protestations,since you constantly insist that your "Reality" is the only one! That I find humorous, perhaps a definition would be in order: Solipsism: The ideology that only one's own mind is sure to exist. Solipsists contend that knowledge of anything outside of one's own mind is unsure, hence there is no such thing as objective truth, and nothing about the external world and it's workings can actually be known. So by that definition, where are your objective facts? Don't seem to have seen any, just conjecture, so you would be more than correct in claiming that title, actually something I can agree with. And those large groups that come together are your proclaimed democracy, much like the one in Switzerland that removed the rights of Muslims to construct minarets, a form of religious restrictions. Again, I must remind you, reality is formed by reason, not by emotion. And that isn't my dictate but the dictate of natural law. As I am not a god, I only follow natural law, not make it. It is the solipsist that have a perception they are god. Solipsist are mentally ill. But you forgot moral relativism, where the presence of truth and morality in the lives of the people of any given society is inversely proportional to the presence of tyranny and slavery in that society. True freedom can never exist in a society that embraces "Moral Relativism" (the idea that there is no inherent and objective difference between right and wrong, so humanity may arbitrarily "create" or "decide" right and wrong for themselves). When you deny objective reality, that process based on reason and logic, you end up in the world of solipsism. When reality is based on emotional factors, then it can never be objective, just a manifestation of what one wants to be reality, a perception based on those emotions. But I do so enjoy at which string elicits what reactions. It is so entertaining. |
|
|