Topic: Obama: Playing racial games | |
---|---|
yeah, cause he has a history of doing that,, both times,,,lol Really? Nothing to do with Harry Reid making sure nothing got through the Senate that Odumbo didn't like? Well, I'm stocking up on popcorn as come the 114th Congress, the entertainment could get really great. Wonder which they will cause, world collapse or world war? Well not much difference anyway is there, one leads to the other, just a matter of which leads. |
|
|
|
sea from outside the game into the game, knowing all data one sea one self was intended to sea, then the total sum of what shall happen in advance one cannot fail to know.
sea ahead of the curve, impossible if one be following those whom wish to create the curve one self sea. |
|
|
|
uhuh,, and still to the point of the 1400 odd bills that were VOTED ON from jan of 09 he has a quite the history of vetoing (2 times) that's about what? 1/10th of 1 %of the time wont find a rate of veto much lower than that,,,,, https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/statistics however,, it is not so hard to find a rate of hung up bills that is similar to that which people use to explain the 'do nothing' congress,,, in congresses that still managed to pass much more,,, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2014/11/07/are-300-house-bills-really-bottled-up-in-the-senate/ What a joke, the numbers mean nothing. What is the context of the bills being held? Are the ones like renewal of the Patriot act going through and the bills that would benefit the people but make the red team look good going through? Such are the antecedents of the institution which is everywhere now so busily converting social power by wholesale into State power.[11] The recognition of them goes a long way towards resolving most, if not all, of the apparent anomalies which the conduct of the modern State exhibits. It is of great help, for example, in accounting for the open and notorious fact that the State always moves slowly and grudgingly towards any purpose that accrues to society's advantage, but moves rapidly and with alacrity towards one that accrues to its own advantage; nor does it ever move towards social purposes on its own initiative, but only under heavy pressure, while its motion towards anti-social purposes is self-sprung. -Albert Jay Nock. Our Enemy, The State (1935) |
|
|
|
Desperate to hold onto power, some Democratic candidates spent election season trying to scare black voters to polls. They claimed shootings like the one in Ferguson and the 2012 Trayvon Martin case in Florida would become common if Republicans prevailed. At the bottom of the barrel was the scurrilous comment by Harlem’s Rep. Charlie Rangel that some in the GOP “believe that slavery isn’t over.” So it goes six years after America elected the first black president. That history-making moment was supposed to usher in an era of peace in the melting pot. But that’s not what happened. Instead, a strong plurality of people believe race relations actually are growing worse under President Obama. In a time of stark political polarization, that agreement stands out as a rare piece of common ground among whites, black and Latinos. Thanks to last week’s election rout, the debate is settled over whether Obama is a failed president. From the lackluster economy to global troubles, his obvious shortcomings are legion. Yet race relations were one area where it seemed safe to assume he would leave a positive legacy. His meteoric rise sent hopes soaring that the scars of the past would be erased the moment he took office. He had compared himself to the Great Emancipator, Abraham Lincoln. He announced his candidacy from the same spot Lincoln had announced his, in Springfield, Ill., and took the oath on Lincoln’s Bible. “Not only is Lincoln one of my political heroes,” Obama told USA Today in 2007, “but, like Lincoln, I served for seven years in Springfield in the state Senate, and it’s there I learned how to legislate; it’s there that I developed many of my political ideas.” Much of the nation shared his optimism. An NBC News exit poll in 2008 asked voters how they thought race relations would fare under Obama. Some 47 percent said they would get better, 34 percent thought they would stay about the same, while only 15 percent expected them to get worse. But last week, another NBC exit poll captured the bad news. Only 20 percent said race relations had improved under Obama, while 38 percent say they are worse. Blacks are especially disappointed. Nearly 60 percent had high hopes in 2008, while only 19 percent now say things are better. A whopping 43 percent say things are worse. Other polls found an even more lopsided view. A survey for Investor’s Business Daily found that nearly half of all adults think race relations are worse under Obama and 1 in 4 believe they are “much worse.” Only 18 percent say they are better. While the problems are too entrenched to pinpoint a single source of failure, the president cannot escape responsibility. After all, he appointed and has supported Attorney General Eric Holder, who took office by calling the country a “nation of cowards” on race. That was provocative enough, but Holder routinely injects racial charges into political and legal issues, as if nothing has changed in 50 years. He sent a small army of FBI agents to Ferguson and declared the police force guilty of bias, even before an investigation. He complained last April that he and Obama had been subjected to unique criticism, then denied he was talking about race. In July, as election season heated up, he charged that he and Obama were subjected to “racial animus.” Then there’s Al Sharpton, who has the ear of de Blasio, Holder and Obama despite being notoriously divisive. Asked by The Washington Post how Sharpton, baggage and all, became so close to Obama, an aide said: “There’s a trust factor with The Rev from the Oval Office on down. He gets it.” OK, then. That says it all. That's what happens when you put a narcissistic, race baiting sociopath in the White House. He is slowly derailing, coming un hinged after last Tuesday. Saying he will use executive orders to push through radical laws like the Amnesty for illegal criminals, which he will end up getting impeached for and rightfully so. He should have been impeached several times over by now for bypassing and thumbing his nose at Congress. You mean have the sociopaths/psychopaths in the past have been somehow different? What about the ultimate but no where near as smooth psychopath, ole GW? |
|
|
|
in the seat of powers there be no racial games, nor corrupt games, nor most popular person games, but rather only all such games presented to the peoples, that keep the blind peoples fighting one another over data handed them, keeping them busied with the natural infinity debate about who be the most guilty, while power sit high and comfortable with no fear, seeing the game work well.
hail to power. |
|
|
|
the president approval has plummeted with congress Reagan had quite a different situation, and still pretty much fluctuated between the low 40s and mid 50s approval thru his term,,, and AFTER he left, he slowly became remembered as a great and a revered president,,, But that wont happen with Odumbo, sinking, sinking, sunk, not worth salvaging. And the winners always write the history books and they enjoy making the bad even worse. |
|
|