Community > General Discussion

Topic: Languages?
dreamerana Joined Sat 09/21/13 Posts: 21544	Mon 10/27/14 07:45 PM
English & espa�ol El espa�ol es una lengua bonita Me gusta conversar en Es me gustar�a saber mas idiomas como tu. eres admirable.

dcastelmissy Joined Thu 08/01/13 Posts: 39633	Mon 10/27/14 10:01 PM
I can speak and write English and Spanish fluently; I can read French and Italian and sometimes can understand the basic meaning, but speaking and constructing sentences would be a tad bit difficult. In my opinion, however, Spanish is "el lenguaje del amor" @OP It's wonderful that you speak so many languages! Are you planning on learning any more languages in the future?

unknown_romeo Joined Wed 03/26/14 Posts: 7691	Tue 10/28/14 05:10 AM
I can speak and write English and Spanish fluently; I can read French and Italian and sometimes can understand the basic meaning, but speaking and constructing sentences would be a tad bit difficult. In my opinion, however, Spanish is "el lenguaje del amor" @OP It's wonderful that you speak so many languages! Are you planning on learning any more languages in the future? That's great As for learning other languages I don't think my brain can learn more lol....not at the moment though

unknown_romeo Joined Wed 03/26/14 Posts: 7691	Tue 10/28/14 05:11 AM
me gustar�a saber mas idiomas como tu. eres admirable. Gracias, querido, qu� otros idiomas te gustar�a aprender?

unknown_romeo Joined Wed 03/26/14 Posts: 7691	Tue 10/28/14 05:19 AM
me gustar�a saber mas idiomas como tu. eres admirable. Aprend� idiomas mientras crec�a, pero si usted tiene un inter�s en cualquier Te puedo ense�ar un poco si te gusta

Philosopher8659 Joined Tue 10/28/14 Posts: 37	Fri 10/31/14 12:06 PM
The question assumes that one has a definition of language. If one knew what that was, one would be familiar with a Two-Element Metaphysics being explored a long time ago, not only by ancient Greeks, but it is also fundamental to the Judeo-Christian Scripture. The Two-Element Metaphysics is based on the definition of a thing, and it is reflected in biology. It also means that there are fundamentally two branches of language, logics and analogics. Common grammars are logics. Now think about this. The human mind is wholly responsible for human behavior. The human mind functions only to the degree that principles of language are functionally resident in that mind. Therefore the foundation of human behavior can be traced back to the principles of language. Human psychology is derived from the principles of logic and analogic functionally resident in a mind. However, if the principles of language are not known, not recognized, etc, etc, one cannot claim to be fluent in any language. one eventually concludes that mankind is proto-linguistic, therefore pre-civil, and that there is no one fluent in any language, because we are proto-linguistic. Certain philosophers have made statements in regard to language and human behavior and they have never been understood. They could not be. Someday, maybe they will. I have developed an analogic that some have searched for, for a very long time, basic analog mathematics. What it demonstrates is that all of mathematics is derivable from simple Euclidean Geometry, effectively leaving the non-Euclidean Genius's with no math for their fantasies.

Pinkbunny43 Joined Sun 05/12/13 Posts: 26547	Fri 10/31/14 12:13 PM
The question assumes that one has a definition of language. If one knew what that was, one would be familiar with a Two-Element Metaphysics being explored a long time ago, not only by ancient Greeks, but it is also fundamental to the Judeo-Christian Scripture. The Two-Element Metaphysics is based on the definition of a thing, and it is reflected in biology. It also means that there are fundamentally two branches of language, logics and analogics. Common grammars are logics. Now think about this. The human mind is wholly responsible for human behavior. The human mind functions only to the degree that principles of language are functionally resident in that mind. Therefore the foundation of human behavior can be traced back to the principles of language. Human psychology is derived from the principles of logic and analogic functionally resident in a mind. However, if the principles of language are not known, not recognized, etc, etc, one cannot claim to be fluent in any language. one eventually concludes that mankind is proto-linguistic, therefore pre-civil, and that there is no one fluent in any language, because we are proto-linguistic. Certain philosophers have made statements in regard to language and human behavior and they have never been understood. They could not be. Someday, maybe they will. I have developed an analogic that some have searched for, for a very long time, basic analog mathematics. What it demonstrates is that all of mathematics is derivable from simple Euclidean Geometry, effectively leaving the non-Euclidean Genius's with no math for their fantasies. so your answer is no then?

Dodo_David Joined Fri 08/13/10 Posts: 48948	Fri 10/31/14 03:42 PM
I took a French class once. My kissing greatly improved.

TheThaneless1 Joined Thu 10/30/14 Posts: 31	Fri 10/31/14 04:31 PM
I used to speak German pretty well, I took 4 years of German in high school and then forgot how to speak it shortly after graduation. I told myself "meh.. I will probably never own a German butcher shop with German speaking customers..." I was wrong....

Philosopher8659 Joined Tue 10/28/14 Posts: 37	Fri 10/31/14 04:50 PM
The question assumes that one has a definition of language. If one knew what that was, one would be familiar with a Two-Element Metaphysics being explored a long time ago, not only by ancient Greeks, but it is also fundamental to the Judeo-Christian Scripture. The Two-Element Metaphysics is based on the definition of a thing, and it is reflected in biology. It also means that there are fundamentally two branches of language, logics and analogics. Common grammars are logics. Now think about this. The human mind is wholly responsible for human behavior. The human mind functions only to the degree that principles of language are functionally resident in that mind. Therefore the foundation of human behavior can be traced back to the principles of language. Human psychology is derived from the principles of logic and analogic functionally resident in a mind. However, if the principles of language are not known, not recognized, etc, etc, one cannot claim to be fluent in any language. one eventually concludes that mankind is proto-linguistic, therefore pre-civil, and that there is no one fluent in any language, because we are proto-linguistic. Certain philosophers have made statements in regard to language and human behavior and they have never been understood. They could not be. Someday, maybe they will. I have developed an analogic that some have searched for, for a very long time, basic analog mathematics. What it demonstrates is that all of mathematics is derivable from simple Euclidean Geometry, effectively leaving the non-Euclidean Genius's with no math for their fantasies. so your answer is no then? Wow! I don't think I gave it much thought.

Pinkbunny43 Joined Sun 05/12/13 Posts: 26547	Fri 10/31/14 04:59 PM
The question assumes that one has a definition of language. If one knew what that was, one would be familiar with a Two-Element Metaphysics being explored a long time ago, not only by ancient Greeks, but it is also fundamental to the Judeo-Christian Scripture. The Two-Element Metaphysics is based on the definition of a thing, and it is reflected in biology. It also means that there are fundamentally two branches of language, logics and analogics. Common grammars are logics. Now think about this. The human mind is wholly responsible for human behavior. The human mind functions only to the degree that principles of language are functionally resident in that mind. Therefore the foundation of human behavior can be traced back to the principles of language. Human psychology is derived from the principles of logic and analogic functionally resident in a mind. However, if the principles of language are not known, not recognized, etc, etc, one cannot claim to be fluent in any language. one eventually concludes that mankind is proto-linguistic, therefore pre-civil, and that there is no one fluent in any language, because we are proto-linguistic. Certain philosophers have made statements in regard to language and human behavior and they have never been understood. They could not be. Someday, maybe they will. I have developed an analogic that some have searched for, for a very long time, basic analog mathematics. What it demonstrates is that all of mathematics is derivable from simple Euclidean Geometry, effectively leaving the non-Euclidean Genius's with no math for their fantasies. so your answer is no then? Wow! I don't think I gave it much thought. I think you thought too much.....it was a simple question.....

Philosopher8659 Joined Tue 10/28/14 Posts: 37	Fri 10/31/14 05:05 PM
The question assumes that one has a definition of language. If one knew what that was, one would be familiar with a Two-Element Metaphysics being explored a long time ago, not only by ancient Greeks, but it is also fundamental to the Judeo-Christian Scripture. The Two-Element Metaphysics is based on the definition of a thing, and it is reflected in biology. It also means that there are fundamentally two branches of language, logics and analogics. Common grammars are logics. Now think about this. The human mind is wholly responsible for human behavior. The human mind functions only to the degree that principles of language are functionally resident in that mind. Therefore the foundation of human behavior can be traced back to the principles of language. Human psychology is derived from the principles of logic and analogic functionally resident in a mind. However, if the principles of language are not known, not recognized, etc, etc, one cannot claim to be fluent in any language. one eventually concludes that mankind is proto-linguistic, therefore pre-civil, and that there is no one fluent in any language, because we are proto-linguistic. Certain philosophers have made statements in regard to language and human behavior and they have never been understood. They could not be. Someday, maybe they will. I have developed an analogic that some have searched for, for a very long time, basic analog mathematics. What it demonstrates is that all of mathematics is derivable from simple Euclidean Geometry, effectively leaving the non-Euclidean Genius's with no math for their fantasies. so your answer is no then? Wow! I don't think I gave it much thought. I think you thought too much.....it was a simple question..... That is called transference. Or again, anthropomorphism. As language is the only power a mind can have, I suspect in most cases it is a simple question.

Pinkbunny43 Joined Sun 05/12/13 Posts: 26547	Fri 10/31/14 05:07 PM
The OP just wanted to know if you spoke any other languages......sheesh

Philosopher8659 Joined Tue 10/28/14 Posts: 37	Fri 10/31/14 05:12 PM
The OP just wanted to know if you spoke any other languages......sheesh I am sorry if I appear to be an idiot. But I have this little problem, I do what I want. I think as I think. And if it bothers you that not every body lives in a simple world, read the news.

Pinkbunny43 Joined Sun 05/12/13 Posts: 26547	Fri 10/31/14 05:15 PM
The OP just wanted to know if you spoke any other languages......sheesh I am sorry if I appear to be an idiot. But I have this little problem, I do what I want. I think as I think. And if it bothers you that not every body lives in a simple world, read the news. I never called you an idiot.....but I do think you are calling me one....but hey I don't care....I like my simple world and my simple life.....and FYI, I watch the news everyday

Philosopher8659 Joined Tue 10/28/14 Posts: 37	Fri 10/31/14 05:19 PM
The OP just wanted to know if you spoke any other languages......sheesh I am sorry if I appear to be an idiot. But I have this little problem, I do what I want. I think as I think. And if it bothers you that not every body lives in a simple world, read the news. I never called you an idiot.....but I do think you are calling me one....but hey I don't care....I like my simple world and my simple life.....and FYI, I watch the news everyday Well, I don't have the stomach for it. But I have been working to solve problems no one else in history has been able to solve. I have done remarkably well with it. I would rather not watch the news, but change it.

Pinkbunny43 Joined Sun 05/12/13 Posts: 26547	Fri 10/31/14 05:20 PM
Good luck with that

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Fri 10/31/14 05:21 PM Edited by Conrad_73 on Fri 10/31/14 05:24 PM
The question assumes that one has a definition of language. If one knew what that was, one would be familiar with a Two-Element Metaphysics being explored a long time ago, not only by ancient Greeks, but it is also fundamental to the Judeo-Christian Scripture. The Two-Element Metaphysics is based on the definition of a thing, and it is reflected in biology. It also means that there are fundamentally two branches of language, logics and analogics. Common grammars are logics. Now think about this. The human mind is wholly responsible for human behavior. The human mind functions only to the degree that principles of language are functionally resident in that mind. Therefore the foundation of human behavior can be traced back to the principles of language. Human psychology is derived from the principles of logic and analogic functionally resident in a mind. However, if the principles of language are not known, not recognized, etc, etc, one cannot claim to be fluent in any language. one eventually concludes that mankind is proto-linguistic, therefore pre-civil, and that there is no one fluent in any language, because we are proto-linguistic. Certain philosophers have made statements in regard to language and human behavior and they have never been understood. They could not be. Someday, maybe they will. I have developed an analogic that some have searched for, for a very long time, basic analog mathematics. What it demonstrates is that all of mathematics is derivable from simple Euclidean Geometry, effectively leaving the non-Euclidean Genius's with no math for their fantasies. yeah,right! Smarter than the average Bear,hmm? I suppose all the great Minds throughout History were just little Pikers then?

Philosopher8659 Joined Tue 10/28/14 Posts: 37	Fri 10/31/14 05:23 PM
I don't think so, but view my work, it is all posted for free on the Internet Archive.

Pinkbunny43 Joined Sun 05/12/13 Posts: 26547	Fri 10/31/14 05:26 PM