No, I heard on the news today he is giving him an honorable discharge.

Great! He now seeks to make honorable service to your country as notable as he made the Nobel Peace Prize!

But why not? He also wants to give illegal alien lawbreakers free citizenship and welfare along with our jobs!

Anything for a vote...... even if it is illegal as well! He's lost most of his legal support!

I have a question here. If Barack Obama released terorists to bring home a deserter it sounds like he is in league with enemies of the state? Am I missing something here?

I would think that ANY violation of Federal Law would be a "great enough offense"

Since when did that ever become acceptable?

The truth of the matter is that a POTUS doesn't need to break the law to be impeached. His actions can be called into question and impeachment implemented on a simple belief his policies can cause harm to the general public he represents. It DOES NOT need to be criminal!

EPIC - Trey Gowdy gets a standing ovation on House Floor - 'We Make Law!'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzZT9gW5gp8

Oh yeah? What is your news source?

Just because I am the one who mentions the elephant in the room doesn't mean it isn't there.

This president's race has been the reason there is no reason to the crap that flies around about him.

There is no legitimacy to impeachment. Just like no one here impeached Bush over the same exact actions.

Just because you imagine an elephant in the room doesn't mean that it is really there.

Shoot I wish it was my imagination....it is so damn ugly....

"Ugly" is how some people describes President Obama's policies and decisions.

Yes, people have legitimate gripes about his policies and decisions.

She is actually looking at the Jacka$$,not the Elephant!

Malarkey,otherwise they would have,since they controlled House and Senate!
Think a bit!
So apparently those action weren't the same,no matter how much you wish it!

Liberals!

They don't seem to understand that it's not the number of EOs and signing statements, it's the context of them!

Wow, blue team against red team,and why> Just what is the real issue? Blue pissed off because red let some people go and there was no one crying and now blue released some and all the red idiots are up in arms.

How about both red and blue stop being ignorant of the real issue, why are there these huge bunch of guys being held in a place that is part of another nation we are no way friendly with that have never been tried, had their day in court.

Why is it that approximately half, supposedly more than half now the five are gone, have been cleared to released to some nations that are now not in the good graces of the idiots in Washington so they have to remain in captivity like animals.

Where is the outcry for the rule of law? Why haven't these guys been tried? Why did some of those released have to claim guilt to being some odd function for Osama, like his chef, his cook, his driver, his doorman and other strange and benign oddities?

This is but a prime example of the depth to which the ignorant masses of this country has sunk.

But if you want to play the blame game, then blame Bush for the men he imprisoned there without benefit of law, not for the number released, the same for Odumbo.

And as for the other matters Odumbo has pulled, what the heck, you get what you elect. He has spent his entire term in office acting like the monkeys down at the zoo, defecating and then throwing in the faces of the gawkers, the ignorant masses that proudly proclaim he represents them, and he truly does.

Rude, extremely rude would be more like it, that would be me. But name calling, that would be a misconstruction of the issue.

As little tikes most of society has always been told not to say the truth out loud, to sugar coat the truth so that others would not be embarrassed by their own little fallacies and idiosyncrasies.

Well, I'm not built that way, I have no problem at all in being extremely rude and bring to light anything in the darkness. If one chooses to remain ignorant by refusing the knowledge that is readily available, then let's call a spade a spade, it called ignorance. It's not myself calling one ignorant, it just naming that which another chooses to be.

And just to make sure it's all understood, an idiot is one that by choice has deemed the action of refusing knowledge that is known, ignorance, which leaves them ignorant of that knowledge.

So this really has nothing to do with me at all except for not being politically polite and not mention that which another chooses to do but wishes that another won't mention, sorry, but I'm going to mention it.

"One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious. The latter procedure, however, is disagreeable and therefore, not popular." - Carl Jung

By whom? What is the great plan, Jeb Bush to the rescue? A Tea Party House? A red team Senate? Just how and where is this to take place?

In other words, just who is that big THEY?

You can't be serious. What was that series of nasty remarks make by yourself lately?