Topic: For the ladies
Whispers4U's photo
Fri 03/28/14 11:17 PM
Opening doors, assistance with a chair in a restaurant, walking on the side closest to traffic. Are these etiquette's no longer accepted or needed?

blueyedgal4554's photo
Sat 03/29/14 08:12 PM
You have to ask that? Really? Chivalry never goes out of style, at least with our generation (and I hate to date myself, but it is what it is). A woman still likes to be treated like a lady.

no photo
Sat 03/29/14 08:33 PM

Opening doors, assistance with a chair in a restaurant, walking on the side closest to traffic. Are these etiquette's no longer accepted or needed?


accepted, needed, and appreciated!

pkh's photo
Sat 03/29/14 08:33 PM
Please whispers4u go on tell me more. No all kidding aside yes those qualities are accepted and very much appreciated

no photo
Sat 03/29/14 08:49 PM
Chivalry is one way to my heart...

ridewytepony's photo
Sat 03/29/14 09:02 PM
Edited by ridewytepony on Sat 03/29/14 09:04 PM

Opening doors, assistance with a chair in a restaurant, walking on the side closest to traffic. Are these etiquette's no longer accepted or needed?

I have tried to walk the woman on the inside and tell
them that means she's 'available' but they forget and don't care what side they walk on, so now I just slap a 'for sale by owner' sign on their back as we walk.whoa

Argo's photo
Sat 03/29/14 09:02 PM
whispers4U must not have.....felt accepted or needed....

bcos he's already de-activated his profile...whoa ...what a pity..

pkh's photo
Sat 03/29/14 09:08 PM

whispers4U must not have.....felt accepted or needed....
Lol to funny
bcos he's already de-activated his profile...whoa ...what a pity..

blueyedgal4554's photo
Sun 03/30/14 05:03 AM

I have tried to walk the woman on the inside and tell
them that means she's 'available' but they forget and don't care what side they walk on, so now I just slap a 'for sale by owner' sign on their back as we walk.whoa


Okay, this gentlemanly jester dates back to the horse and buggy day when men walked on the "outside" to protect the woman. As most individuals would not know the "taken, not taken" implication of this, I really wouldn't get that hung up on it.