Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: Reasonable or unreasonable ruling?
alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Fri 02/28/14 02:50 PM
I 'said' nothing here about entitlements,, try to stay focused on the topic at hand,,, declaring a breech of contract isn't the question, the question is what should (reasonably) CONSTITUTE a breech of contract,, Entitlements, your normal discourse on why somebody should have something, relevant to the conclusion of why you would have a problem with a constitutionally sound law and not an unconstitutionally invalid law, entitlements. And as to what would reasonably constitute a breech of contract, a breech, violation of the terms, non-performance. All the same. Now if we go back to entitlements, then you would have a problem understanding reasonably.

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Fri 02/28/14 02:54 PM
communists and cubans? what has that to do with the inexperience of youth or the daughter? You wouldn't understand. Sorry wrong tense.

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Fri 02/28/14 02:57 PM
lol yeah, ok

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Fri 02/28/14 02:58 PM
Call it the biggest Facebook mistake ever. A daughter’s snarky status update has cost her father the $80,000 settlement he won in an age-discrimination lawsuit. According to the Miami Herald, Patrick Snay, 69, was the headmaster at Gulliver Preparatory School in Miami for several years, but in 2010, the school didn’t renew his contract. Snay sued his former employer for age discrimination and won a settlement of $80,000 in November 2011. The agreement contained a standard confidentiality clause, prohibiting Snay or the school from talking about the case. However, Snay’s daughter, Dana, now at Boston College and a part-time Starbucks barista, couldn’t resist bragging about the case on Facebook. “Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver,” she wrote. “Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT.” More on Yahoo Shine: Teen Hit With $6,000 Bill After Using Facebook During NYC Vacation Dana has 1,200 Facebook friends, many of whom are current and former Gulliver students, and news of the post made its way back to the school’s lawyers, who appealed the verdict. The Third District Court of Appeal tossed out the $80,000 settlement earlier this week. “Snay violated the agreement by doing exactly what he had promised not to do,” Judge Linda Ann Wells wrote. “His daughter then did precisely what the confidentiality agreement was designed to prevent.” More on Yahoo: More Than 3 Million Teens Flee Facebook According to depositions obtained by the Miami Herald, Snay argued that he needed to share the news with his daughter because she suffered “psychological scars” from her time at the school and besides, she knew her parents were in mediation. “We knew what the restrictions were, yet we needed to tell her something,” he said. Snay is now headmaster at Riviera Preparatory Academy in Coral Gables. He is allowed to file a motion for rehearing and also appeal to the Florida Supreme Court. However, the odds of Snay's winning his money back are slim, according to attorney Bradley Shear. “It depends on the terms of the confidentiality contract; each one is different, but the damage is likely done,” Shear tells Yahoo Shine. “Some confidentiality agreements stipulate that the client cannot tell people who are not involved in the case: others prohibit anyone from knowing. Facebook is a public forum, even if her profile is set to private, and that’s where the mistake was made.” Had Snay’s daughter been discreet, the court would not have discovered the family had violated Snay's contract. “The bottom line is, when involved in legal proceedings, don’t disclose anything on social media,” says Shear. “It’s not worth it.” Oh, and that European vacation? Probably not happening now. http://sundial.csun.edu/2013/02/colorblind-ideology-a-new-form-of-racism/ although I don't think the daughter was wise in her choice, I do think it was her choice as she signed no agreement and the father cant control what she shares with whom and being in the same home and aware of the lawsuit , it would be unreasonable to expect him to be able to keep it from her,,, what for did you sneak that Link about Racism into your post,which has no bearing on it or the Article you posted? It's in the troll handbook on How to shuck-n-jive, aka, divert attention.

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Fri 02/28/14 03:02 PM
does parents marital status omit one from the law school process? or just another irrelevant contribution,,,? Yeah, most lawyers can be said to be missing fathers so they instead join that little private union as a substitute and then swear they will be officers of the court and promise to be fair. To bad they never say to whom they are going to be fair.

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Fri 02/28/14 03:05 PM
lol yeah, ok Wow, would that be you looking to hook up? Nice pic.

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Fri 02/28/14 03:10 PM
lol keep smoking,, I aint mad at ya,,

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Fri 02/28/14 03:23 PM
lol keep smoking,, I aint mad at ya,, Oh you really wouldn't want that, I get much more creative and exciting. You couldn't handle it. That's when I have to log into CL political or legal forums for the speed and diversity. No holds barred, knock them down, drag them out, raging debates. Excellent practice for the fast paced exchange of a court of law where you snooze you lose. Also helps thicken the armor. You couldn't handle that either. But I like it here, develops other skills.

Fracus16 Joined Tue 12/31/13 Posts: 104	Fri 02/28/14 04:02 PM
Hey everybody!!! First time in a year that it has rained on consecutive days in SoCal!!!! There is a God!!!! I am not a Laywer nor any other expert. What I do posses is a vast amount of experience in communication. In this day and age, is anything a secret? And our government is still trying to keep things hush hush. The only time government can hold secrets is when it has to do with the countries security. And that has now gone to the wayside because of the 9/11 cover up. The man is old. He worked. Give him his money. As for lawyers and legal terminology... Anyone on this planet can defend them self verbal if they take the emotion out of it and listen, really listen to the other person or side. Communication: Movement, objects, speech, and words We communicate through gross symbols. We call them objective. The only thing we cannot escape is our point of view. Let it RAIN BABY!!! RAIN!!!!

Sergei99 Joined Fri 02/28/14 Posts: 9	Sat 03/01/14 08:49 AM
This is a case where free speech was anything but free. The law is probably pretty clear on this, and if the daughter violated the confidentiality agreement that she had signed, then her dad does not have much of a case. There are some other factors as well, involving the social media piece. Was someone in the company monitoring this girl's Facebook page?

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Sat 03/01/14 09:13 AM
This is a case where free speech was anything but free. The law is probably pretty clear on this, and if the daughter violated the confidentiality agreement that she had signed, then her dad does not have much of a case. There are some other factors as well, involving the social media piece. Was someone in the company monitoring this girl's Facebook page? the daughter signed no agreement, the dad did but he is on the line for sharing with his daughter she went to the school he worked, probably teased about his firing, and it therefore got around school that he won the case by her posting to facebook,,

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Sat 03/01/14 09:52 AM
Hey everybody!!! First time in a year that it has rained on consecutive days in SoCal!!!! There is a God!!!! I am not a Laywer nor any other expert. What I do posses is a vast amount of experience in communication. In this day and age, is anything a secret? And our government is still trying to keep things hush hush. The only time government can hold secrets is when it has to do with the countries security. And that has now gone to the wayside because of the 9/11 cover up. The man is old. He worked. Give him his money. As for lawyers and legal terminology... Anyone on this planet can defend them self verbal if they take the emotion out of it and listen, really listen to the other person or side. Communication: Movement, objects, speech, and words We communicate through gross symbols. We call them objective. The only thing we cannot escape is our point of view. Let it RAIN BABY!!! RAIN!!!! Are you sure that isn't just Sacramento pissing on you?

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Sat 03/01/14 09:57 AM
This is a case where free speech was anything but free. The law is probably pretty clear on this, and if the daughter violated the confidentiality agreement that she had signed, then her dad does not have much of a case. There are some other factors as well, involving the social media piece. Was someone in the company monitoring this girl's Facebook page? Daughter not a party to the agreement and as such she never signed, the father did. But she did violate which means the father violated which is the breech. Makes contract null and void, but good news, he gets to keep the $10,000 in back wages.

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Sat 03/01/14 10:01 AM
This is a case where free speech was anything but free. The law is probably pretty clear on this, and if the daughter violated the confidentiality agreement that she had signed, then her dad does not have much of a case. There are some other factors as well, involving the social media piece. Was someone in the company monitoring this girl's Facebook page? the daughter signed no agreement, the dad did but he is on the line for sharing with his daughter she went to the school he worked, probably teased about his firing, and it therefore got around school that he won the case by her posting to facebook,, So now you are a law major or just practicing law without a license. Can you tell me where to find that opinion as in law you are allowed opinions so long as other before you have agreed and published their opinion in those thousands upon thousands of law books that fill floors and floors of shelves in a law library. And how often do you go to these law libraries?

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Sat 03/01/14 10:03 AM Edited by msharmony on Sat 03/01/14 10:04 AM
creepy much? is there a law license in your background affording you the right to YOUR opinion? are you published in law books? just curious why there is always such an interest in my pedigree, its truly stalker behavior,,

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Sat 03/01/14 10:24 AM Edited by alnewman on Sat 03/01/14 10:31 AM
creepy much? By your definition, an extreme amount, mucho, grande, vieles, beaucoup is there a law license in your background affording you the right to YOUR opinion? Free men don't need licenses and my opinions are backed by fact and in many cases, that fact is documented, especially legal opinions. are you published in law books? Thanks for admitting you have never referenced a law book in your life. But yes, I have been published. just curious why there is always such an interest in my pedigree, its truly stalker behavior,, And I have absolutely no doubt about your pedigree as you have made it extremely obvious that you have none. Not that I really care about your personal life, it seems uneventful, not worth wasting time on. However, your bs is of interest. I detest bs and will challenge it at every opportunity. Stalking, you are posting on a public forum claiming your bs, your idiocy and your prejudice and then proclaim some kind of immunity to being challenged. So if you don't like it, you have the right to remain silent, you have the right to keep your opinions private, and your have the right to educate or not educate yourself, so long as you do it without thinking someone else should pay for it. And yes, you did peek and yes I am a constitutional scholar and spend considerable time studying the constitution and law. I not only know where the law library is, but I am familiar with how to use it. What is really remarkable is Lexus Nexus and the computer age shepardizing. So fast, so thorough.

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Sat 03/01/14 10:31 AM Edited by msharmony on Sat 03/01/14 10:34 AM
I was checking your age nothing on a self proclaimed profile surprises me,, speaking of bs and CREEPY is the SPECIAL Attention I am given,,, where as no one else sharing an opinion is constantly asked about their pedigree as a response someone speaking about pets, wouldn't be asked if they were a vet someone speaking about the congress, wouldn't be asked if they were a senator or representative no one else in this thread sharing their opinion is asked or is it implied they are required to have 'expertise' to share their opinion I find THAT creepy

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Sat 03/01/14 10:49 AM
I was checking your age "Wisdom really does come with age: Older people's knowledge and experience means they make better decisions Old people's brains slow but experience and knowledge make up for it Older people show greater patience and better financial understanding They are also slightly less scared of losing money than young people" nothing on a self proclaimed profile surprises me,, speaking of bs True, you are a prime example but I could care less. I judge by actions as age has taught me, a persons actions don't lie about their true character. And when one feels they need to lie to themselves, how can they be any different to others.

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Sat 03/01/14 11:01 AM
lol I TOTALLY AGREE wisdom is EXPECTED to come with age,, that's why I Was curious about the age of someone who so often resorts to childlike personal insults and asides and I don't really care either, I also judge by actions ,,waiting for the thread to get back on topic,,, HINT: the topic isn't me,,lol

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Sat 03/01/14 11:17 AM
lol I TOTALLY AGREE wisdom is EXPECTED to come with age,, that's why I Was curious about the age of someone who so often resorts to childlike personal insults and asides and I don't really care either, I also judge by actions ,,waiting for the thread to get back on topic,,, HINT: the topic isn't me,,lol The thread is on topic... Reasonable or unreasonable ruling? And you opinion is unreasonable, has been reasonably challenged, and unreasonably sidetracked by childish insults without any rebuts of the challenge. So I would guess that as it is not rebutted, it is accepted, UCC 2-207. And using ignorance of a subject to be projected as the right to an opinion based on that ignorance is purely astounding. But to maintain a posture of insult when challenged as a legitimate rebuttal is beyond comprehension. So please, when entering a contest of wits, come armed.