Topic: Obama: 'I didn't set a red line' on Syria | |
---|---|
OKAY I'M READY FOR HIM NOW. BRING HIM ON! HE NEEDS TO BE PUNISHED. Oh yea! Baby |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red line, huh? What, they adding food color to the cocaine lines? |
|
|
|
You know it's bad when Russia's Putin calls Obama on his lies but the American people blindly stand behind him. There is something that nags me regarding Putin's confidence that Syria did not use any gas. There are hundreds of Russian technicians there and have been for a long time that service many of the weapon systems; rockets, jet fighters. etc. including radar controlled systems. I wonder IF they also include any part of the chemical weapons or their delivery systems; if so, they would have undoubtedly informed Moscow of their use. More troubling is with their presence there and what might be the results if any are killed in an attack; be it a dozen or a few dozen. Good Americans cried for blood when US 'advisers' were killed in attacks in Vietnam despite President Kennedy saying that it was a civil war and ultimately they would have to win or loose it. America would do nothing more than send them weapons and advisers and technical staff for the weapons and training on their armed forces. When he was killed, the Pentagram all the 'Intelligence' Agencies convinced old LBJ to let them put "boots on the ground" and 'clean that mess up'...right. They sure did. Everyone in Europe knows that there is a defense agreement between Syria and Russia...use what intelligence one may have and think what that means. Could Russian troops go to help Syria just as US troops went into Vietnam to help defend "national security"? Is it any wonder why so many are scrambling to stay away from not only agreeing with a strike against Syria but of possible direct confrontation with Russian troops acting as allies, just as US troops have done several times. America holds no monopoly on defense agreements or sending troops to defend a country being attacked from outside. As the old Chinese saying about living in "interesting times" goes...seems things could get very interesting indeed. Russian Spetnaz troops could be there in mere hours...Any Russian naval forces that might be in the Black Sea could sail into the Mediterranean also, after all, their sailors haven't visited the many ports there in years...perhaps a good time for a late summer cruise... (Oh the things we speculate on...) |
|
|
|
You know it's bad when Russia's Putin calls Obama on his lies but the American people blindly stand behind him. There is something that nags me regarding Putin's confidence that Syria did not use any gas. There are hundreds of Russian technicians there and have been for a long time that service many of the weapon systems; rockets, jet fighters. etc. including radar controlled systems. I wonder IF they also include any part of the chemical weapons or their delivery systems; if so, they would have undoubtedly informed Moscow of their use. More troubling is with their presence there and what might be the results if any are killed in an attack; be it a dozen or a few dozen. Good Americans cried for blood when US 'advisers' were killed in attacks in Vietnam despite President Kennedy saying that it was a civil war and ultimately they would have to win or loose it. America would do nothing more than send them weapons and advisers and technical staff for the weapons and training on their armed forces. When he was killed, the Pentagram all the 'Intelligence' Agencies convinced old LBJ to let them put "boots on the ground" and 'clean that mess up'...right. They sure did. Everyone in Europe knows that there is a defense agreement between Syria and Russia...use what intelligence one may have and think what that means. Could Russian troops go to help Syria just as US troops went into Vietnam to help defend "national security"? Is it any wonder why so many are scrambling to stay away from not only agreeing with a strike against Syria but of possible direct confrontation with Russian troops acting as allies, just as US troops have done several times. America holds no monopoly on defense agreements or sending troops to defend a country being attacked from outside. As the old Chinese saying about living in "interesting times" goes...seems things could get very interesting indeed. Russian Spetnaz troops could be there in mere hours...Any Russian naval forces that might be in the Black Sea could sail into the Mediterranean also, after all, their sailors haven't visited the many ports there in years...perhaps a good time for a late summer cruise... (Oh the things we speculate on...) It makes one wonder what Obama would do if the Russians took a stand to support Syria. |
|
|
|
I JUST WANT TO START THE PUNISHMENT.
|
|
|
|
It makes one wonder what Obama would do if the Russians took a stand to support Syria. The Russians are already backing off I think. Instead of repeating their threat of dire consequences, they are now suggesting that the evidence against Assad be examined more carefully. Maybe they do know something... Here is a good question: WHERE DID THE GAS COME FROM... Russia? Israel? America? CIA? I don't think Assad and his thugs are smart enough to make it. |
|
|
|
It makes one wonder what Obama would do if the Russians took a stand to support Syria. The Russians are already backing off I think. Instead of repeating their threat of dire consequences, they are now suggesting that the evidence against Assad be examined more carefully. Maybe they do know something... Here is a good question: WHERE DID THE GAS COME FROM... Russia? Israel? America? CIA? I don't think Assad and his thugs are smart enough to make it. Making it is easy if you have the raw materials. "Revealed: UK Government let British company export nerve gas chemicals to Syria " http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/revealed-uk-government-let-british-company-export-nerve-gas-chemicals-to-syria-8793642.html |
|
|
|
It makes one wonder what Obama would do if the Russians took a stand to support Syria. The Russians are already backing off I think. Instead of repeating their threat of dire consequences, they are now suggesting that the evidence against Assad be examined more carefully. Maybe they do know something... Here is a good question: WHERE DID THE GAS COME FROM... Russia? Israel? America? CIA? I don't think Assad and his thugs are smart enough to make it. Making it is easy if you have the raw materials. "Revealed: UK Government let British company export nerve gas chemicals to Syria " http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/revealed-uk-government-let-british-company-export-nerve-gas-chemicals-to-syria-8793642.html |
|
|
|
It makes one wonder what Obama would do if the Russians took a stand to support Syria. US better get it together because divided, they may fall. |
|
|
|
It makes one wonder what Obama would do if the Russians took a stand to support Syria. The Russians are already backing off I think. Instead of repeating their threat of dire consequences, they are now suggesting that the evidence against Assad be examined more carefully. Maybe they do know something... Here is a good question: WHERE DID THE GAS COME FROM... Russia? Israel? America? CIA? I don't think Assad and his thugs are smart enough to make it. Making it is easy if you have the raw materials. "Revealed: UK Government let British company export nerve gas chemicals to Syria " http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/revealed-uk-government-let-british-company-export-nerve-gas-chemicals-to-syria-8793642.html It came from Saddam Hussain. It was shipped to Syria from Iraq before we invaded iraq. |
|
|