2 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14
Topic: is sex really necessary in a relationship?
rindamin666's photo
Thu 04/04/13 06:05 AM
The SEX is necesary if the other person is not handicap, ha ha.

no photo
Thu 04/04/13 06:16 AM


Before i say anything,what kind/type/form of sex are we talking about???




Melmacian maybe? :tongue:


uuummm,
I didnt think they''do those things too''?!!

*confused*

Dodo_David's photo
Thu 04/04/13 06:19 AM



Before i say anything,what kind/type/form of sex are we talking about???




Melmacian maybe? :tongue:


uuummm,
I didnt think they''do those things too''?!!

*confused*

Newbiechick, marry me, and you'll learn what a Melmacian does in the bedroom. bigsmile

no photo
Thu 04/04/13 06:33 AM




Before i say anything,what kind/type/form of sex are we talking about???




Melmacian maybe? :tongue:


uuummm,
I didnt think they''do those things too''?!!

*confused*

Newbiechick, marry me, and you'll learn what a Melmacian does in the bedroom. bigsmile


Ha ha ha haaaaa
You might end up chasing me around the house........you catch me,you teach me! :banana: :banana:

TawtStrat's photo
Thu 04/04/13 06:56 AM
What the heck is "a dating relationship"? Oh, don't bother. This is just you trying to denegrate extra marrital relationships yet again.

It's just a piece of paper.

no photo
Thu 04/04/13 07:07 AM

To OP

the human being is a very primitive animal, by the sexual act expresses dominance and possession, the sexually stronger dominates the relationship, in the end we were all created as beings in the animal world

Dodo_David's photo
Thu 04/04/13 07:14 AM

What the heck is "a dating relationship"? Oh, don't bother. This is just you trying to denegrate extra marrital relationships yet again.

It's just a piece of paper.


huh I simply answered the question asked by the author of the OP.

When my late wife and I were dating (prior to our wedding), she and I didn't have to have sexual intercourse in order for the two of us to have a meaningful romance. We were able to give each other plenty of physical affection without going "all the way".

Now, if another person believes that sexual intercourse is necessary in a dating relationship, then so be it. That person's belief isn't going to affect me.

pyxxie13's photo
Thu 04/04/13 07:29 AM
Is that a serious question? scared

TxsGal3333's photo
Thu 04/04/13 07:36 AM
Humm....I guess it is to each their own.... To me if there is no sex to bond that relationship it is and will remain just a friendship.... slaphead

So no I'm not going to just date someone and sex never be involved.noway

Now if you were already sexually with them for a period of time and something happen to them where sex was taken out of the picture. That would be a totally different situation. For I would never leave my partner once we had that bond due to they could not have sex anymore because of a medical problem...whoa

Jesser1's photo
Thu 04/04/13 07:46 AM
I am guessing that person is a bit jaded? ?

prashant01's photo
Thu 04/04/13 07:51 AM

Humm....I guess it is to each their own.... To me if there is no sex to bond that relationship it is and will remain just a friendship.... slaphead

So no I'm not going to just date someone and sex never be involved.noway

Now if you were already sexually with them for a period of time and something happen to them where sex was taken out of the picture. That would be a totally different situation. For I would never leave my partner once we had that bond due to they could not have sex anymore because of a medical problem...whoa


Hey,

That's absolutely Okay for me....so when are we meeting?happy

Jesser1's photo
Thu 04/04/13 07:51 AM
A dating relationship is one that is more than friendship...that looks forward to an intimacy that includes a sexual relationship

msharmony's photo
Thu 04/04/13 08:09 AM

Sexual intercourse is not necessary in a dating relationship.

It is expected in a marital relationship unless one marriage partner is too disabled for it.




I agree

I believe physical interaction can range from hugs, kisses, fondling, etc and a list of things that dont involve sexual penetration

love and compatibility and friendship are NECESSARY, but I think people can have successful happy relationships abstaining from actual sexual penetration ( of the natural, babymaking variety)



prashant01's photo
Thu 04/04/13 08:13 AM
I could not take this question in any other way than "Is it necessary to have sex in a relationship in which sex is but obvious....!"

If it is but obvious,then why would any one avoid it?

Why would they come closer to each other in such sexually obvious relationship if they aren't sexually attracted to each other?

Isn't it just a fantasy to expect such complicated relationship within sexually & mentally compliant persons?

no photo
Thu 04/04/13 08:23 AM
Yes, sex would be necessary in a relationship for me. Otherwise, it would be like hanging out with a friend. I am not interested in a sexless romantic relationship.

Jesser1's photo
Thu 04/04/13 08:30 AM
I agree sing..I would be frustrated beyond belief

TawtStrat's photo
Thu 04/04/13 08:53 AM
So, basically some people choose to abstain from sex for whatever reason but there is certainly a diference between a commited relationship and just dating somebody. It's the piece of paper that isn't really necessary but some people require it.

Goofball73's photo
Thu 04/04/13 08:53 AM

Love must come first over lust.


Let's do some clarifying here. This statement, while true, is too broad to simply answer this question. Sure love must come first for a relationship to sustain itself. You can notice a person on their looks, or their intelligence, or their acts of kindness or on just about anything. Something will make a person sexy to you (and this differs from person to person). That attraction will lead to those feelings of wanting to make love to that person, or just humping the heck out of them. laugh You can love them all you want but at some point the sexual attraction will lead to....sex. The fact that you love this person will make the sexual experience all the more meaningful.

However.....bad sex or even no sex can and normally does ruin a relationship. We had some dud on here who posted a topic about cheating. He cheated on his wife(which he claimed that he loved more than anything) and stated that his wife could not satisfy him sexually. Not having sex with the woman he loved tempted him to cheat (and he fell prey to that temptation). I am not saying this happens to every couple, but it is a common thing nowadays. Sex IS NOT the most important part of a relationship. However, it damn sure is important to help sustain it.

I was in a relationship that was based solely on the great sex she and I had. At first I thought we were in love but it turned out to be a sexual thing between us. Don't get me wrong. Falling in love with a woman and then also lusting for her is a great combo and one I feel is very healthy. Lust will only get you so far. Anyways, love and sex are important.

mightymoe's photo
Thu 04/04/13 09:13 AM
i feel that sex may or may not be important... it's not that important to me, because i can control myself and my feelings... someone that has a need to be accepted/wanted to make themselves feel better will want sex more... like goof was saying about the guy who loves his wife but has to have sex with someone else... thats just a lack of self control, nothing more...

no photo
Thu 04/04/13 09:19 AM

i feel that sex may or may not be important... it's not that important to me, because i can control myself and my feelings... someone that has a need to be accepted/wanted to make themselves feel better will want sex more... like goof was saying about the guy who loves his wife but has to have sex with someone else... thats just a lack of self control, nothing more...


Since when does wanting sex or feeling it's important mean the person cannot control themselves or their feelings?

2 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14