Topic: Polyamory
gfh60's photo
Mon 09/24/12 12:18 AM
Any polyamorous, gal's here? :banana:

no photo
Sun 07/05/15 05:27 PM
Polygamy is viable, when both partners agree to have more than one spouse. The world of multiple spouses, does not exclude women. Muslims, Mormons and other male-dominated religions, are in for a rude awakening. Watch-out Christians, the trend may be coming your way!

no photo
Sun 07/05/15 05:33 PM
Quote -

Watch-out Christians, the trend may be coming your way.
--------------------------------------------------------
Not for true Jews or Juedo Christians it won't :angel:

SitkaRains's photo
Sun 07/05/15 05:37 PM
Watch-out Christians, the trend may be coming your way!

all rightie then.. I will keep the light onslaphead

2OLD2MESSAROUND's photo
Sun 07/05/15 05:51 PM
Edited by 2OLD2MESSAROUND on Sun 07/05/15 06:12 PM
vejjcar posted >>>
Watch-out Christians, the trend may be coming your way!

SitkaRains stated >>>
all rightie then.. I will keep the light onslaphead


I've got my security light on; back door & front door --- they might be drawn towards the 'LIGHT' but the 'ZAP' will be their DOOM!!! Bwaahahahaaaaaa

BTW - to the club Vejjcar...we be a rowdy bunch of wise acres around here - and it does get worse way later in the day!


no photo
Sun 07/05/15 05:53 PM

vejjcar posted >>>
Watch-out Christians, the trend may be coming your way!

SitkaRains stated >>>
all rightie then.. I will keep the light onslaphead


I've got my security light on; back door & front door --- they might be drawn towards the 'LIGHT' but the 'ZAP' will be their DOOM!!! Bwaahahahaaaaaa

BTW - to the club Vejjcar...we be a rowdy bunch of wise acres around here - and it does get worse way later in the day!




rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl

ZAP !

TMommy's photo
Wed 07/08/15 05:29 PM
Edited by TMommy on Wed 07/08/15 05:30 PM
oh ya like I would really wanna try to juggle more than one man...sheeshhuh ya know what polyamorous used to be called back in the day? a two timing azzholebigsmile

Dodo_David's photo
Wed 07/08/15 06:11 PM
Edited by Dodo_David on Wed 07/08/15 06:12 PM

oh ya like I would really wanna try to juggle more than one man...sheeshhuh ya know what polyamorous used to be called back in the day? a two timing azzholebigsmile


They are still called that. :tongue:

By the way, is there a particular reason why someone revived a thread that has been dead for more than 2 years?

no photo
Wed 07/08/15 06:48 PM
By the way, is there a particular reason why someone revived a thread that has been dead for more than 2 years?
------------------------------------------------------
Because Gay Marriage was made legal & immediately after The Supreme Court decision, TWO states filed to legalized Polygamy.

I thought this post was obvious.....

vejjcar quoted

Polygamy is viable, when both partners agree to have more than one spouse. The world of multiple spouses, does not exclude women. Muslims, Mormons and other male-dominated religions, are in for a rude awakening. Watch-out Christians, the trend may be coming your way!

no photo
Wed 07/08/15 07:06 PM
http://www.westernjournalism.com/today-in-history-polygamy-in-america/

July 6,2015, this day in History...
July 6,1854

Today In History: Polygamy In America

The chief plank of the Republican Party was "to prohibit...those twin relics of barbarism: POLYGAMY AND SLAVERY."

William Federer
July 6, 2015 at 7:07am

A decade prior to the Civil War there were two major political parties in the United States: Democrats, who favored freedom of choice to own slaves; and Whigs, who tried to be a big tent party to stem the loss of members to the Know-Nothing Party.

In Ripon, Wis., anti-slavery activists met for the first time on February 28, 1854, then held their first state convention in Jackson, Mich., JULY 6, 1854.


This new political party took a stand on social issues concerning the value of human life; namely, they were against slavery.

Also, in response to a movement in Utah to redefine marriage, this new party stood for marriage being between one man and one woman.

They named their party “Republican.”


The chief plank of the Republican Party was “to prohibit…those twin relics of barbarism: POLYGAMY AND SLAVERY.”

Those attempting to redefine marriage were denounced by Republican President Ulysses S. Grant, December 4, 1871:

In Utah there still remains a remnant of barbarism, repugnant to civilization, to decency, and to the laws of the United States…

Neither polygamy nor any other violation of existing statutes will be permitted…

They will not be permitted to violate the laws under the cloak of religion.
On December 7, 1875, President Grant stated:

In nearly every annual message… I have called attention to the…scandalous condition of affairs existing in the Territory of Utah, and have asked for definite legislation to correct it.

That polygamy should exist in a free, enlightened, and Christian country, without the power to punish so flagrant a crime against decency and morality, seems preposterous…

As an institution polygamy should be banished from the land…

I deem of vital importance to….drive out licensed immorality, such as polygamy and the importation of women for illegitimate purposes.
Republican President Rutherford B. Hayes stated, December 1, 1879, “Polygamy is condemned as a crime by the laws of all civilized communities throughout the world.”

President Hayes stated, December 6, 1880, “The SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE and the FAMILY relation are the cornerstone of our American society and civilization.”

Republican President Chester Arthur stated, December 6, 1881, “For many years the Executive…has urged the necessity of stringent legislation for the suppression of polygamy…this odious crime, so revolting to the moral and religious sense of Christendom.”

Supreme Court Chief Justice Morrison Waite, appointed by Republican Ulysses S. Grant, rendered the Murphy v. Ramsey, 1885, decision:

Every person who has a husband or wife living…and marries another…is guilty of polygamy, and shall be punished…

No legislation can be supposed more wholesome and necessary in the founding of a free, self-governing commonwealth…than that which seeks to establish it on the basis of the idea of THE FAMILY, as consisting in and springing from the union for life of ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN in the holy estate of matrimony; the sure foundation of all that is stable and noble in our civilization; the best guaranty of that reverent morality which is the source of all beneficent progress in social and political improvement.
The stand to preserve natural marriage as being between one man and one woman precludes Islam, which allows polygamy and child brides. The comprehensive annotated John Quincy Adams – A Bibliography, compiled by Lynn H. Parsons (Westport, CT, 1993, p. 41, entry #194, Essay on Turks, 1827) stated: “Mohammed poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy.”

St. Thomas Aquinas wrote in Summa contra Gentiles, 1258, “Mohammed…seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us…and he gave free reign to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men.”

Winston Churchill wrote in The River War, 1899, “The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.”

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Field, appointed by Republican President Abraham Lincoln, rendered the Davis v. Beason, 1890, decision:

Bigamy and polygamy are crimes by the laws of all civilized and Christian countries…

They…destroy the purity of the MARRIAGE relation…degrade woman and debase man…

There have been sects which denied…there should be any marriage tie, and advocated promiscuous intercourse of the sexes as prompted by the passions of its members…

Should a sect of either of these kinds ever find its way into this country, swift punishment would follow.
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Field concluded, “The constitutions of several States, in providing for religious freedom, have declared expressly that such freedom SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO EXCUSE ACTS OF LICENTIOUSNESS.”

Republican President Theodore Roosevelt stated to Congress, January 30, 1905, “The institution of MARRIAGE is, of course, at the very foundation of our social organization, and all influences that affect that institution are of vital concern to the people of the whole country.”
___
For an in-depth comparison of political parties, past & present, visit WND.

Brought to you by AmericanMinute.com

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

About the author: William Federer
Tags: American History

no photo
Thu 07/09/15 08:55 AM

Polygamy is viable, when both partners agree to have more than one spouse. The world of multiple spouses, does not exclude women. Muslims, Mormons and other male-dominated religions, are in for a rude awakening. Watch-out Christians, the trend may be coming your way!

With the Supreme court redefining marriage, Polygamy is actually right around the corner. It has been practiced out West for years. Now illegally. Personally even though I truly believe that marriage should be between one man and one woman, who am I to say that a man cannot have more than one wife, or a woman to have more than one husband (polyandry). In fact that may be an ideal relationship. Since American opportunity has been shipped overseas, it is actually hard to afford a wife. I guess that I could share one, sort of like bike sharing or car sharing. In a way though since Gay marriage is based on the 14th Amendment, I think that the US owes Utah an apology. Especially the Mormon religion an apology, that had to change its view on Polygamy to join the Union. Actually Polygamy is in the Old Testament. I think that King Solomon had 700 wives. Wow if I had that many wives I would be worn out.

no photo
Sat 08/01/15 10:10 AM
Everyone is missing the point. It means that it is ok for your wife to have other husbands and you now. Maybe if you are lucky you will get to watch.