100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: PA teacher compares Nazi Germany to US under President Obama | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Never read about this before now.
http://www.whale.to/b/eisenhower.html Truly Amazing Eisenhower's Holocaust - His Slaughter Of 1.7 Million Germans |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
s1owhand
on
Fri 08/03/12 06:50 AM
|
|
There is nothing about the United States that even remotely resembles Nazi Germany. See for yourself here - it is no joke. Warning graphic photos. http://youtu.be/gG2QaN_LUao http://www.qualityinformationpublishers.com/nazi-concentration-camp-pictures/ Read more here: http://www1.yadvashem.org/yv/en/holocaust/index.asp Really? "God , I hate the Germans," Eisenhower wrote to his wife, Mamie, in September, 1944. 
Sure. Saying one hates the German military for all their atrocities is comparable to exterminating systematically millions of people. LMAO
Please read about the millions of HUMAN BEINGS (Germans) that died under the leadership of Eisenhower in that death camp... It is a gigantic steaming pile of nonsense! There has never been any evidence of large scale US death camps. How do you expect they could have hidden millions of German civilians bodies? This is such garbage - all opinion with distortions of facts and unwarranted extrapolations and no evidence. So what else is new from the conspiracy theorist community...
Read about how the Eisenhower Death Camp Conspiracy Theory has been completely debunked here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other_Losses Other Losses is a 1989 book by Canadian writer James Bacque, in which Bacque alleges that U.S. General Dwight Eisenhower intentionally caused the deaths by starvation or exposure of around a million German prisoners of war held in Western internment camps briefly after the Second World War. Other Losses charges that hundreds of thousands of German prisoners that had fled the Eastern front were designated as "Disarmed Enemy Forces" in order to avoid recognition under the third Geneva Convention, for the purpose of carrying out their deaths through disease or slow starvation. Other Losses cites documents in the U.S. National Archives and interviews with people who stated they witnessed the events. The book claims that there was a "method of genocide" in the banning of Red Cross inspectors, the returning of food aid, the policy regarding shelter building, and soldier ration policy. The book has been extensively criticized by mainstream historians, with one stating that it "makes charges that are demonstrably absurd". Stephen Ambrose and seven other historians examined the book soon after its publication, and came to the conclusion that it was inaccurate and the product of conspiracy theory. After the publication of Bacque's book, a panel of eight historians gathered for a symposium in the Eisenhower Center for American Studies[38] at the University of New Orleans from December 7–8, 1990 to review Bacque's work.[39] The introduction to a book later published containing each panelists' papers noted that Bacque is a Canadian novelist with no previous historical research or writing experience.[40] The introduction concludes that "Other Losses is seriously — nay, spectacularly — flawed in its most fundamental aspects.".[39] The historians conclude that, among its many problems, Other Losses:[39] misuses documents misreads documents ignores contrary evidence employs a statistical methodology that is hopelessly compromised made no attempt to see the evidence he has gathered in relation to the broader situation made no attempt to perform any comparative context puts words into the mouths of the subjects of his oral history ignores a readily available and absolutely critical source that decisively dealt with his central accusation As a consequence of those and other shortcomings, the book "makes charges that are demonstrably absurd."[39] Panel member Stephen Ambrose later wrote in the New York Times: Mr. Bacque is wrong on every major charge and nearly all his minor ones. Eisenhower was not a Hitler, he did not run death camps, German prisoners did not die by the hundreds of thousands, there was a severe food shortage in 1945, there was nothing sinister or secret about the "disarmed enemy forces" designation or about the column "other losses." Mr. Bacque's "missing million" were old men and young boys in the Volkssturm (People's Militia) released without formal discharge and transfers of POWs to other allies control areas. Maj. Ruediger Overmans of the German Office of Military History in Freiburg who wrote the final volume of the official German history of the war estimated that the total death by all causes of German prisoners in American hands could not have been greater than 56,000 approximately 1% of the over 5,000,000 German POWs in Allied hands exclusive of the Soviets.
Who is the next mass murderer of the week? Mickey Mouse? Abraham Lincoln? Howdy Doody?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Optomistic69
on
Fri 08/03/12 07:08 AM
|
|
Millions of people have been murdered and all we hear is.....
Its a conspiracy Theory Where do I buy my tin foil hat |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Fri 08/03/12 07:17 AM
|
|
Never read about this before now. http://www.whale.to/b/eisenhower.html Truly Amazing Eisenhower's Holocaust - His Slaughter Of 1.7 Million Germans Didn't happen! Now you could hold a Seance,and ask Uncle Joe how many POWs he's slaughtered in Siberia and elsewhere! But that thing about Eisenhower is pure slander! It was Hitler's Total War that killed those Germans! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Really? "God , I hate the Germans," Eisenhower wrote to his wife, Mamie, in September, 1944. Earlier, in front of the British ambassador to Washington, he had said that all the 3,500 or so officers of the German General Staff should be "exterminated." http://www.whale.to/b/bacque1.html Mass starvation of Germans http://www.whale.to/b/starvation_of_germans.html 
Ron Paul mentions America's "secret prisons" and torture in front Congress and speaks out about America's obsession with Iran. So who do you think these secret prisons are for??? Some of them already have people in them. They are "classified." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw5tk9BRQ0Q&feature=plcp To starve the Heck out the Germans!? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call it callousness, call it reprisal, call it a policy of hostile neglect: a million Germans taken prisoner by Eisenhower's armies died in captivity after the surrender.
One million fighting men allowed to die. Remember a soldier does what he is told to do. They were only doing their job. Selective victimhood is sectarian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call it callousness, call it reprisal, call it a policy of hostile neglect: a million Germans taken prisoner by Eisenhower's armies died in captivity after the surrender. One million fighting men allowed to die. Remember a soldier does what he is told to do. They were only doing their job. Selective victimhood is sectarian I see assertions Galore,but very little evidence! Besides,none of the Germans I met after the War told any Stories like that! Bring some Objective Evidence,or I would have to think whatever I want to think about this! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is nothing about the United States that even remotely resembles Nazi Germany. See for yourself here - it is no joke. Warning graphic photos. http://youtu.be/gG2QaN_LUao http://www.qualityinformationpublishers.com/nazi-concentration-camp-pictures/ Read more here: http://www1.yadvashem.org/yv/en/holocaust/index.asp Really? "God , I hate the Germans," Eisenhower wrote to his wife, Mamie, in September, 1944.
Sure. Saying one hates the German military for all their atrocities is comparable to exterminating systematically millions of people. LMAO
Please read about the millions of HUMAN BEINGS (Germans) that died under the leadership of Eisenhower in that death camp... It is a gigantic steaming pile of nonsense! There has never been any evidence of large scale US death camps. How do you expect they could have hidden millions of German civilians bodies? This is such garbage - all opinion with distortions of facts and unwarranted extrapolations and no evidence. So what else is new from the conspiracy theorist community...
Read about how the Eisenhower Death Camp Conspiracy Theory has been completely debunked here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other_Losses Other Losses is a 1989 book by Canadian writer James Bacque, in which Bacque alleges that U.S. General Dwight Eisenhower intentionally caused the deaths by starvation or exposure of around a million German prisoners of war held in Western internment camps briefly after the Second World War. Other Losses charges that hundreds of thousands of German prisoners that had fled the Eastern front were designated as "Disarmed Enemy Forces" in order to avoid recognition under the third Geneva Convention, for the purpose of carrying out their deaths through disease or slow starvation. Other Losses cites documents in the U.S. National Archives and interviews with people who stated they witnessed the events. The book claims that there was a "method of genocide" in the banning of Red Cross inspectors, the returning of food aid, the policy regarding shelter building, and soldier ration policy. The book has been extensively criticized by mainstream historians, with one stating that it "makes charges that are demonstrably absurd". Stephen Ambrose and seven other historians examined the book soon after its publication, and came to the conclusion that it was inaccurate and the product of conspiracy theory. After the publication of Bacque's book, a panel of eight historians gathered for a symposium in the Eisenhower Center for American Studies[38] at the University of New Orleans from December 7–8, 1990 to review Bacque's work.[39] The introduction to a book later published containing each panelists' papers noted that Bacque is a Canadian novelist with no previous historical research or writing experience.[40] The introduction concludes that "Other Losses is seriously — nay, spectacularly — flawed in its most fundamental aspects.".[39] The historians conclude that, among its many problems, Other Losses:[39] misuses documents misreads documents ignores contrary evidence employs a statistical methodology that is hopelessly compromised made no attempt to see the evidence he has gathered in relation to the broader situation made no attempt to perform any comparative context puts words into the mouths of the subjects of his oral history ignores a readily available and absolutely critical source that decisively dealt with his central accusation As a consequence of those and other shortcomings, the book "makes charges that are demonstrably absurd."[39] Panel member Stephen Ambrose later wrote in the New York Times: Mr. Bacque is wrong on every major charge and nearly all his minor ones. Eisenhower was not a Hitler, he did not run death camps, German prisoners did not die by the hundreds of thousands, there was a severe food shortage in 1945, there was nothing sinister or secret about the "disarmed enemy forces" designation or about the column "other losses." Mr. Bacque's "missing million" were old men and young boys in the Volkssturm (People's Militia) released without formal discharge and transfers of POWs to other allies control areas. Maj. Ruediger Overmans of the German Office of Military History in Freiburg who wrote the final volume of the official German history of the war estimated that the total death by all causes of German prisoners in American hands could not have been greater than 56,000 approximately 1% of the over 5,000,000 German POWs in Allied hands exclusive of the Soviets.
Who is the next mass murderer of the week? Mickey Mouse? Abraham Lincoln? Howdy Doody?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is nothing about the United States that even remotely resembles Nazi Germany. See for yourself here - it is no joke. Warning graphic photos. http://youtu.be/gG2QaN_LUao http://www.qualityinformationpublishers.com/nazi-concentration-camp-pictures/ Read more here: http://www1.yadvashem.org/yv/en/holocaust/index.asp Really? "God , I hate the Germans," Eisenhower wrote to his wife, Mamie, in September, 1944.
Sure. Saying one hates the German military for all their atrocities is comparable to exterminating systematically millions of people. LMAO
Please read about the millions of HUMAN BEINGS (Germans) that died under the leadership of Eisenhower in that death camp... It is a gigantic steaming pile of nonsense! There has never been any evidence of large scale US death camps. How do you expect they could have hidden millions of German civilians bodies? This is such garbage - all opinion with distortions of facts and unwarranted extrapolations and no evidence. So what else is new from the conspiracy theorist community...
Read about how the Eisenhower Death Camp Conspiracy Theory has been completely debunked here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other_Losses Other Losses is a 1989 book by Canadian writer James Bacque, in which Bacque alleges that U.S. General Dwight Eisenhower intentionally caused the deaths by starvation or exposure of around a million German prisoners of war held in Western internment camps briefly after the Second World War. Other Losses charges that hundreds of thousands of German prisoners that had fled the Eastern front were designated as "Disarmed Enemy Forces" in order to avoid recognition under the third Geneva Convention, for the purpose of carrying out their deaths through disease or slow starvation. Other Losses cites documents in the U.S. National Archives and interviews with people who stated they witnessed the events. The book claims that there was a "method of genocide" in the banning of Red Cross inspectors, the returning of food aid, the policy regarding shelter building, and soldier ration policy. The book has been extensively criticized by mainstream historians, with one stating that it "makes charges that are demonstrably absurd". Stephen Ambrose and seven other historians examined the book soon after its publication, and came to the conclusion that it was inaccurate and the product of conspiracy theory. After the publication of Bacque's book, a panel of eight historians gathered for a symposium in the Eisenhower Center for American Studies[38] at the University of New Orleans from December 7–8, 1990 to review Bacque's work.[39] The introduction to a book later published containing each panelists' papers noted that Bacque is a Canadian novelist with no previous historical research or writing experience.[40] The introduction concludes that "Other Losses is seriously — nay, spectacularly — flawed in its most fundamental aspects.".[39] The historians conclude that, among its many problems, Other Losses:[39] misuses documents misreads documents ignores contrary evidence employs a statistical methodology that is hopelessly compromised made no attempt to see the evidence he has gathered in relation to the broader situation made no attempt to perform any comparative context puts words into the mouths of the subjects of his oral history ignores a readily available and absolutely critical source that decisively dealt with his central accusation As a consequence of those and other shortcomings, the book "makes charges that are demonstrably absurd."[39] Panel member Stephen Ambrose later wrote in the New York Times: Mr. Bacque is wrong on every major charge and nearly all his minor ones. Eisenhower was not a Hitler, he did not run death camps, German prisoners did not die by the hundreds of thousands, there was a severe food shortage in 1945, there was nothing sinister or secret about the "disarmed enemy forces" designation or about the column "other losses." Mr. Bacque's "missing million" were old men and young boys in the Volkssturm (People's Militia) released without formal discharge and transfers of POWs to other allies control areas. Maj. Ruediger Overmans of the German Office of Military History in Freiburg who wrote the final volume of the official German history of the war estimated that the total death by all causes of German prisoners in American hands could not have been greater than 56,000 approximately 1% of the over 5,000,000 German POWs in Allied hands exclusive of the Soviets.
Who is the next mass murderer of the week? Mickey Mouse? Abraham Lincoln? Howdy Doody?
Equally absurd! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facts are facts. History is history. You cannot disprove any of this as much as people want to rewrite history.
It is what it is. You can't change it. |
|
|
|
|
