100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Do You Have The Right To Believe - part 2 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Abstinence keeps one from being stoned...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Human" is a secular term. Psalm 82:6 6I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. Cowboy...Jesus said "Ye Are Gods" to keep from getting stone but anyway you were suppose to supply a passage where it states that God is referred to or defined as a human and/or a person if you can't...then you do not have a right to believe in the Trinity Notice what verse was posted. This was from back in Psalms, was not from the time Jesus took on the form of a servant to dwell among us. So how would it have been to keep from being stoned? Cowboy..."Ye Are God" ...refers to those that place theirselves into the role of God .....like Judges that sit on the bench and pass sentence.... but either way "ye Are God" is not a passage that claims that God the creator is a person |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Human" is a secular term. Psalm 82:6 6I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. Cowboy...Jesus said "Ye Are Gods" to keep from getting stone but anyway you were suppose to supply a passage where it states that God is referred to or defined as a human and/or a person if you can't...then you do not have a right to believe in the Trinity Notice what verse was posted. This was from back in Psalms, was not from the time Jesus took on the form of a servant to dwell among us. So how would it have been to keep from being stoned? Cowboy..."Ye Are God" ...refers to those that place theirselves into the role of God .....like Judges that sit on the bench and pass sentence.... but either way "ye Are God" is not a passage that claims that God the creator is a person lol, "person" is a SECULAR term. It is a word to separate us from God, it is used to please those whom do not believe in God. And I know where you're going with this and "person" and "persons" is two totally different things. A person is an exact type of being a persons is a descriptive word. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Human" is a secular term. Psalm 82:6 6I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. Cowboy...Jesus said "Ye Are Gods" to keep from getting stone but anyway you were suppose to supply a passage where it states that God is referred to or defined as a human and/or a person if you can't...then you do not have a right to believe in the Trinity Notice what verse was posted. This was from back in Psalms, was not from the time Jesus took on the form of a servant to dwell among us. So how would it have been to keep from being stoned? Cowboy..."Ye Are God" ...refers to those that place theirselves into the role of God .....like Judges that sit on the bench and pass sentence.... but either way "ye Are God" is not a passage that claims that God the creator is a person Cowboy..."Ye Are God" ...refers to those that place theirselves into the role of God And no, not true. This verse specifically is referring to the general population. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And I know where you're going with this and "person" and "persons" is two totally different things. A person is an exact type of being a persons is a descriptive word. if you know where I'm going with this person(s) ....then explain the Trinity without referring to God as a person(s)or reducing God to a person |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cowboy, just call "person" a "manifestation"... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And I know where you're going with this and "person" and "persons" is two totally different things. A person is an exact type of being a persons is a descriptive word. if you know where I'm going with this person(s) ....then explain the Trinity without referring to God as a person(s)or reducing God to a person Again "person" and "persons" is two totally different things. Nobody referred to God in anyway as a "person". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And I know where you're going with this and "person" and "persons" is two totally different things. A person is an exact type of being a persons is a descriptive word. if you know where I'm going with this person(s) ....then explain the Trinity without referring to God as a person(s)or reducing God to a person Again "person" and "persons" is two totally different things. Nobody referred to God in anyway as a "person". apparently you can't explain the Trinity without reducing God to either or reducing God literally which is why you do not have a right to believe in The Trinity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AB <--- That's the equation, A*B doesn't"equal" AB; all you did was state the same math problem in two forms.. if you paid attention...AdventureBegins stated that A multiplied by B equal 1 ...not AB it's a frightening thought knowing that you help your son with his homework ..and that's why he's an A student.. He also gave values to A and B. But even so A multiplied B does NOT equal AB. AB is the equation. A*B A x B AB Three forms, same equation. ..illiterate and can't do math? Interesting... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And I know where you're going with this and "person" and "persons" is two totally different things. A person is an exact type of being a persons is a descriptive word. if you know where I'm going with this person(s) ....then explain the Trinity without referring to God as a person(s)or reducing God to a person Again "person" and "persons" is two totally different things. Nobody referred to God in anyway as a "person". apparently you can't explain the Trinity without reducing God to either or reducing God literally which is why you do not have a right to believe in The Trinity I don't believe in the trinity, I believe in God. Using the trinity is the simplest way to explain this God. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore you are using an old 'drink buying' trick based upon that false asumption that I do not understand algreba. (proving that 1 = 2 by dividing by zero and hoping the drunk fool doesn't notice). If you assign a value to the formula. it equals not AB but 1. (should the assigned value be 1) Placing A next to B does not solve the equation it merely rewrites it to a diferent syntax. (unless my math skills are rusty 2 variables placed side by side is also a form of multiplication shorthand) A * B = AB. If A = 1 and B = 1 then AB = 1: Pun intended. you gave "A" the value of God multiplied by "B" which you gave the value of Jesus and then claim it came to one that's Christian ideology not Math in Math it would have been "GJ" not 1 That sir... Is not math rather is it algreba (a math based language of science). Algrebraic sentences say nothing without assigning a value to the variables and SOLVING the equation. A(god) and B(jesus) and C(holy spirit). A is a single entity (value 1) B is a single entity (value 1) C is a single entity (value 1) if x is mankind... Solve for x. ABC = x. 1 * 1 * 1 = 1: We are all in Gods Glory. (Funches 1 is not a lowly 'diminished' number... It is the Greatest Number... There can be only one else nothing exist). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AB <--- That's the equation, A*B doesn't"equal" AB; all you did was state the same math problem in two forms.. if you paid attention...AdventureBegins stated that A multiplied by B equal 1 ...not AB it's a frightening thought knowing that you help your son with his homework ..and that's why he's an A student.. He also gave values to A and B. But even so A multiplied B does NOT equal AB. AB is the equation. A*B A x B AB Three forms, same equation. ..illiterate and can't do math? Interesting... Sin_and_Sorrow ...once again....no one is disputing the equation of how AB is being presented.....so go back and read what is actually going on.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And I know where you're going with this and "person" and "persons" is two totally different things. A person is an exact type of being a persons is a descriptive word. if you know where I'm going with this person(s) ....then explain the Trinity without referring to God as a person(s)or reducing God to a person Again "person" and "persons" is two totally different things. Nobody referred to God in anyway as a "person". apparently you can't explain the Trinity without reducing God to either or reducing God literally which is why you do not have a right to believe in The Trinity I don't believe in the trinity, I believe in God. Using the trinity is the simplest way to explain this God. apparently you can't explain God without reducing him to something lesser than a God....perhaps you should refrain from using The Trinity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore you are using an old 'drink buying' trick based upon that false asumption that I do not understand algreba. (proving that 1 = 2 by dividing by zero and hoping the drunk fool doesn't notice). If you assign a value to the formula. it equals not AB but 1. (should the assigned value be 1) Placing A next to B does not solve the equation it merely rewrites it to a diferent syntax. (unless my math skills are rusty 2 variables placed side by side is also a form of multiplication shorthand) A * B = AB. If A = 1 and B = 1 then AB = 1: Pun intended. you gave "A" the value of God multiplied by "B" which you gave the value of Jesus and then claim it came to one that's Christian ideology not Math in Math it would have been "GJ" not 1 That sir... Is not math rather is it algreba (a math based language of science). Algrebraic sentences say nothing without assigning a value to the variables and SOLVING the equation. A(god) and B(jesus) and C(holy spirit). A is a single entity (value 1) B is a single entity (value 1) C is a single entity (value 1) if x is mankind... Solve for x. ABC = x. 1 * 1 * 1 = 1: We are all in Gods Glory. (Funches 1 is not a lowly 'diminished' number... It is the Greatest Number... There can be only one else nothing exist). what you are trying to use is a digital form of boolean algebra ...but you didn't represent each with their true value but a value pertaining to your belief..... God is omniscient and Jesus and the holy spirit wasn't which means they do not have the same value as God but yet you gave each the same value...and this is why it's Christian ideology that you are promoting and not Math |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AB <--- That's the equation, A*B doesn't"equal" AB; all you did was state the same math problem in two forms.. if you paid attention...AdventureBegins stated that A multiplied by B equal 1 ...not AB it's a frightening thought knowing that you help your son with his homework ..and that's why he's an A student.. He also gave values to A and B. But even so A multiplied B does NOT equal AB. AB is the equation. A*B A x B AB Three forms, same equation. ..illiterate and can't do math? Interesting... Sin_and_Sorrow ...once again....no one is disputing the equation of how AB is being presented.....so go back and read what is actually going on.. I don't need to. You stated, "not possible/delusional". I'm reiterating, you are wrong. Plain and simple. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't need to. You stated, "not possible/delusional". I'm reiterating, you are wrong. Plain and simple. well as I said....if you believe you declaring that something is wrong magically means you are not wrong is why I stated that it's a frightening thought knowing that you help you son with his homework but Father the teacher said this is wrong and here's proof that it is wrong but son I said that it's right therefore your teacher and the proof is wrong if your son gets "A"s with you helping him...it's probably in being "Absent" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well as I said....if you believe you declaring that something is wrong magically means you are not wrong is why I stated that it's a frightening thought knowing that you help you son with his homework but Father the teacher said this is wrong and here's proof that it is wrong but son I said that it's right therefore your teacher and the proof is wrong if your son gets "A"s with you helping him...it's probably in being "Absent" You don't have "proof", because your "proof" proves I am in fact right. And if he was getting C's and D's in math prior to my help, and now is getting A's. This proves your a moron who loves making things personal. You are only "assuming" without fact or proof. I have both of what you lack. Therefore, I am right. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well as I said....if you believe you declaring that something is wrong magically means you are not wrong is why I stated that it's a frightening thought knowing that you help you son with his homework but Father the teacher said this is wrong and here's proof that it is wrong but son I said that it's right therefore your teacher and the proof is wrong if your son gets "A"s with you helping him...it's probably in being "Absent" You don't have "proof", because your "proof" proves I am in fact right. And if he was getting C's and D's in math prior to my help, and now is getting A's. This proves your a moron who loves making things personal. You are only "assuming" without fact or proof. I have both of what you lack. Therefore, I am right. if he is getting "A"s which I doubt...it would be due to his Mother and her new BoyFriend not you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore you are using an old 'drink buying' trick based upon that false asumption that I do not understand algreba. (proving that 1 = 2 by dividing by zero and hoping the drunk fool doesn't notice). If you assign a value to the formula. it equals not AB but 1. (should the assigned value be 1) Placing A next to B does not solve the equation it merely rewrites it to a diferent syntax. (unless my math skills are rusty 2 variables placed side by side is also a form of multiplication shorthand) A * B = AB. If A = 1 and B = 1 then AB = 1: Pun intended. you gave "A" the value of God multiplied by "B" which you gave the value of Jesus and then claim it came to one that's Christian ideology not Math in Math it would have been "GJ" not 1 That sir... Is not math rather is it algreba (a math based language of science). Algrebraic sentences say nothing without assigning a value to the variables and SOLVING the equation. A(god) and B(jesus) and C(holy spirit). A is a single entity (value 1) B is a single entity (value 1) C is a single entity (value 1) if x is mankind... Solve for x. ABC = x. 1 * 1 * 1 = 1: We are all in Gods Glory. (Funches 1 is not a lowly 'diminished' number... It is the Greatest Number... There can be only one else nothing exist). what you are trying to use is a digital form of boolean algebra ...but you didn't represent each with their true value but a value pertaining to your belief..... God is omniscient and Jesus and the holy spirit wasn't which means they do not have the same value as God but yet you gave each the same value...and this is why it's Christian ideology that you are promoting and not Math funches 'value pertaining to your belief'... (you believe so you see not the value and place instead a value pertainint to belief as you see it - division by zero). Omniscient is attributed to God but is balanced by the Unknowable Attribute and so results in zero balance. One remains the number of God. One is the image we are made in. One is the spirit that links us to Glory. One is the future of Mankind. One remains the greatest number. (from it all other numbers come). 'Omniscient' only |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sorry i'm not into the muschristew thingy....*giggles*
|
|
|
|
|
