Topic: Michigan and Arizona Results | |
---|---|
US election 2012: GOPhunt for mystery 'third man' who could beat ...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-election/9102031/US-election-2012-GOP-hunt-for-mystery-third-man-who-could-beat-Obama.html |
|
|
|
who can beat obama in 2012? Santorum or Gingrich. |
|
|
|
Dems voting for Santorum to hurt Romney. CNN's Dana Bash reports on how some Democrats in Michigan are voting in the state's GOP primary.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&hl=en&client=mv-google&v=5JAZAfSxEek&fulldescription=1 |
|
|
|
270towin.com has a great interactive electoral map. And as we know, it's the electoral vote that counts. Ask Al Gore. I don't wanna ask that dirtbag anything. I wonder how his drug addict son is doing? The point is that you can win the popular vote yet lose the electoral vote and hence, not be elected. It happened to Gore in 2000, Grover Cleveland in 1888 and Samuel Tilden in 1876. Your opinion of Gore and his family is irrelevant to this discussion. |
|
|
|
270towin.com has a great interactive electoral map. And as we know, it's the electoral vote that counts. Ask Al Gore. I don't wanna ask that dirtbag anything. I wonder how his drug addict son is doing? The point is that you can win the popular vote yet lose the electoral vote and hence, not be elected. It happened to Gore in 2000, Grover Cleveland in 1888 and Samuel Tilden in 1876. Your opinion of Gore and his family is irrelevant to this discussion. No they are not. |
|
|
|
270towin.com has a great interactive electoral map. And as we know, it's the electoral vote that counts. Ask Al Gore. I don't wanna ask that dirtbag anything. I wonder how his drug addict son is doing? The point is that you can win the popular vote yet lose the electoral vote and hence, not be elected. It happened to Gore in 2000, Grover Cleveland in 1888 and Samuel Tilden in 1876. Your opinion of Gore and his family is irrelevant to this discussion. No they are not. |
|
|
|
9/11 clearly showed us we to belong there. That we need to take a proactive stance and not a reactive stance. You are absolutely right! We need to be PRO-ACTIVE against all those who pose a threat to us!! God Bless the Military Industrial Complex! Bomb Iran! Attack China Nuke Russia! Invade North Korea! Bomb Syria! Did I miss anybody? Did you ever wonder why the majority of American Military personnel support Ron Paul for President? |
|
|
|
Man who have no stance invites less trouble.
Yet from no stance to stance comes quickly when trouble shows. |
|
|
|
Man who have no stance invites less trouble. Yet from no stance to stance comes quickly when trouble shows. ?????? |
|
|
|
9/11 clearly showed us we to belong there. That we need to take a proactive stance and not a reactive stance. You are absolutely right! We need to be PRO-ACTIVE against all those who pose a threat to us!! God Bless the Military Industrial Complex! Bomb Iran! Attack China Nuke Russia! Invade North Korea! Bomb Syria! Did I miss anybody? Did you ever wonder why the majority of American Military personnel support Ron Paul for President? I never said Attack China or Russia. Honestly we don't even need to go after North Korea since they will finish getting rid of their Nuclear facilities for aid and food. If they let inspectors in thenon a regular basis then let them be. I also don't think bombing Syria is the right thing to do. I think military strikes to try and take out Assad and his regime to assist the protesters and innocent people getting slaughtered on an hourly basis. As far as Iran I think attacking their nuclear facilities, government and military bases and taking out the President and Supreme Leader and Guardian Council and helping the people of the country overthrow the evil leaders of that regime. I never said to carpet bomb these countries. |
|
|