100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Do You Have The Right To Believe | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Sin_and_Sorrow
on
Tue 02/28/12 12:13 PM
|
|
It's called making a mistake, but I forgot someone as perfect and great as you doesn't make mistakes. it's called intentionally lying...if not...then explain where in the Noah's Ark story could you have mis-interpet that God placed all the human babies on the Ark I wasn't thinking clearly that day. I apologized for it and was corrected and didn't continue arguing or anything. I LEARNED. And besides that I was not INTENTIONALLY lying, it is what I thought and again was not thinking clearly that day. then explain how someone that reads the bible but yet do not have the need to go to church get the concept that all the babies were on Noah's Ark ... Again after again after again. I was not thinking clearly that day and made a mistake. Now please quit the badgering. just showing why you need to go to church "Church" is irrelevant. "Church" does not make a "Christian". Exactly. I guess Jesus teaching in a temple is irrelvant also ....dude you just keep hanging yourself Jesus didn't just teach in a temple though... so what's your point? my point is if church was irrelvant then Jesus teaching at the temple was a waste of time...don't you agree? No. It was a place to gather, with a shelter, to do such, nothing more. Wouldn't have made a difference if it had be done at a Denny's, now would it? No. Reworded. :D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's called making a mistake, but I forgot someone as perfect and great as you doesn't make mistakes. it's called intentionally lying...if not...then explain where in the Noah's Ark story could you have mis-interpet that God placed all the human babies on the Ark I wasn't thinking clearly that day. I apologized for it and was corrected and didn't continue arguing or anything. I LEARNED. And besides that I was not INTENTIONALLY lying, it is what I thought and again was not thinking clearly that day. then explain how someone that reads the bible but yet do not have the need to go to church get the concept that all the babies were on Noah's Ark ... Again after again after again. I was not thinking clearly that day and made a mistake. Now please quit the badgering. just showing why you need to go to church "Church" is irrelevant. "Church" does not make a "Christian". Exactly. I guess Jesus teaching in a temple is irrelvant also ....dude you just keep hanging yourself Jesus didn't just teach in a temple though... so what's your point? my point is if church was irrelvant then Jesus teaching at the temple was a waste of time...don't you agree? The location of Jesus' teachings is irrelevant. then why did he have a conniption fit and destroy other people property if where he taught is irrelevant What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's called making a mistake, but I forgot someone as perfect and great as you doesn't make mistakes. it's called intentionally lying...if not...then explain where in the Noah's Ark story could you have mis-interpet that God placed all the human babies on the Ark I wasn't thinking clearly that day. I apologized for it and was corrected and didn't continue arguing or anything. I LEARNED. And besides that I was not INTENTIONALLY lying, it is what I thought and again was not thinking clearly that day. then explain how someone that reads the bible but yet do not have the need to go to church get the concept that all the babies were on Noah's Ark ... Again after again after again. I was not thinking clearly that day and made a mistake. Now please quit the badgering. just showing why you need to go to church "Church" is irrelevant. "Church" does not make a "Christian". Exactly. I guess Jesus teaching in a temple is irrelvant also ....dude you just keep hanging yourself Jesus didn't just teach in a temple though... so what's your point? my point is if church was irrelvant then Jesus teaching at the temple was a waste of time...don't you agree? The location of Jesus' teachings is irrelevant. then why did he have a conniption fit and destroy other people property if where he taught is irrelevant ..even that question is irrelevant to the previous one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
CowboyGH
on
Tue 02/28/12 12:12 PM
|
|
It's called making a mistake, but I forgot someone as perfect and great as you doesn't make mistakes. it's called intentionally lying...if not...then explain where in the Noah's Ark story could you have mis-interpet that God placed all the human babies on the Ark I wasn't thinking clearly that day. I apologized for it and was corrected and didn't continue arguing or anything. I LEARNED. And besides that I was not INTENTIONALLY lying, it is what I thought and again was not thinking clearly that day. then explain how someone that reads the bible but yet do not have the need to go to church get the concept that all the babies were on Noah's Ark ... Again after again after again. I was not thinking clearly that day and made a mistake. Now please quit the badgering. just showing why you need to go to church "Church" is irrelevant. "Church" does not make a "Christian". Exactly. I guess Jesus teaching in a temple is irrelvant also ....dude you just keep hanging yourself Jesus didn't just teach in a temple though... so what's your point? my point is if church was irrelvant then Jesus teaching at the temple was a waste of time...don't you agree? No. It was a place to gather, with a shelter, to do such, nothing more. Wouldn't have made a difference if it had done it at a Denny's, would it? No. Exactly. That's all the purpose of a "church" or a "temple". A place for people to go for worship and be out of the enviroment eg., rain, snow, to hot, to cold, ect. But one does not HAVE to go to one for worship. Just allows for congregation out of the elements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
funches
on
Tue 02/28/12 12:18 PM
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church.
Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. no I didn't ask you that...I asked was his Father's house the temple where he taught at "totally" irrevelant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. no I didn't ask you that...I asked was his Father's house the temple where he taught at "totally" irrevelant No, the only thing irrelevant is the LOCATION one is taught about God and or is giving the knowledge of God. It doesn't matter if Jesus was teaching in a temple or in the back ally. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sin_and_Sorrow
on
Tue 02/28/12 12:30 PM
|
|
so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? Technically. The entire PLANET is GOD'S house. That said. Yes, the Temple itself, was irrelevant. T'was the message itself, that was of the import. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. no I didn't ask you that...I asked was his Father's house the temple where he taught at "totally" irrevelant No, the only thing irrelevant is the LOCATION one is taught about God and or is giving the knowledge of God. It doesn't matter if Jesus was teaching in a temple or in the back ally. did Jesus destroy anyone's property in that back alley or anyplace other than the temple? .... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. no I didn't ask you that...I asked was his Father's house the temple where he taught at "totally" irrevelant No, the only thing irrelevant is the LOCATION one is taught about God and or is giving the knowledge of God. It doesn't matter if Jesus was teaching in a temple or in the back ally. did Jesus destroy anyone's property in that back alley or anyplace other than the temple? .... For one EVERYTHING belongs to God, belongs to Jesus. Secondly, no Jesus destroyed nothing. Only turned over a couple tables where they were doing something other then worshipping God. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. no I didn't ask you that...I asked was his Father's house the temple where he taught at "totally" irrevelant No, the only thing irrelevant is the LOCATION one is taught about God and or is giving the knowledge of God. It doesn't matter if Jesus was teaching in a temple or in the back ally. did Jesus destroy anyone's property in that back alley or anyplace other than the temple? .... For one EVERYTHING belongs to God, belongs to Jesus. Secondly, no Jesus destroyed nothing. Only turned over a couple tables where they were doing something other then worshipping God. so Jesus has the right to go into people homes and turn over their tables if he is there teaching and they are doing something other than worshipping God |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. no I didn't ask you that...I asked was his Father's house the temple where he taught at "totally" irrevelant No, the only thing irrelevant is the LOCATION one is taught about God and or is giving the knowledge of God. It doesn't matter if Jesus was teaching in a temple or in the back ally. did Jesus destroy anyone's property in that back alley or anyplace other than the temple? .... For one EVERYTHING belongs to God, belongs to Jesus. Secondly, no Jesus destroyed nothing. Only turned over a couple tables where they were doing something other then worshipping God. so Jesus has the right to go into people homes and turn over their tables if he is there teaching and they are doing something other than worshipping God umm no. Lol you really go out in left field with a lot of your posts. Jesus wasn't in someone else's house. He was in his father's house and people were doing things they were not to be doing in God's house eg., the church. Other people's home are not specifically for worshipping. There is no bartering in God's house, thus Jesus kicked them out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. no I didn't ask you that...I asked was his Father's house the temple where he taught at "totally" irrevelant No, the only thing irrelevant is the LOCATION one is taught about God and or is giving the knowledge of God. It doesn't matter if Jesus was teaching in a temple or in the back ally. did Jesus destroy anyone's property in that back alley or anyplace other than the temple? .... For one EVERYTHING belongs to God, belongs to Jesus. Secondly, no Jesus destroyed nothing. Only turned over a couple tables where they were doing something other then worshipping God. so Jesus has the right to go into people homes and turn over their tables if he is there teaching and they are doing something other than worshipping God umm no. Lol you really go out in left field with a lot of your posts. Jesus wasn't in someone else's house. He was in his father's house and people were doing things they were not to be doing in God's house eg., the church. Other people's home are not specifically for worshipping. There is no bartering in God's house, thus Jesus kicked them out. so Jesus can only turn over tables in his father's house but not anyone else house? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. no I didn't ask you that...I asked was his Father's house the temple where he taught at "totally" irrevelant No, the only thing irrelevant is the LOCATION one is taught about God and or is giving the knowledge of God. It doesn't matter if Jesus was teaching in a temple or in the back ally. did Jesus destroy anyone's property in that back alley or anyplace other than the temple? .... For one EVERYTHING belongs to God, belongs to Jesus. Secondly, no Jesus destroyed nothing. Only turned over a couple tables where they were doing something other then worshipping God. so Jesus has the right to go into people homes and turn over their tables if he is there teaching and they are doing something other than worshipping God umm no. Lol you really go out in left field with a lot of your posts. Jesus wasn't in someone else's house. He was in his father's house and people were doing things they were not to be doing in God's house eg., the church. Other people's home are not specifically for worshipping. There is no bartering in God's house, thus Jesus kicked them out. so Jesus can only turn over tables in his father's house but not anyone else house? Jesus can turn over tables anywhere he dang well pleases lol. But he didn't turn any tables over in anyone elses home, so that is irrelevant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. no I didn't ask you that...I asked was his Father's house the temple where he taught at "totally" irrevelant No, the only thing irrelevant is the LOCATION one is taught about God and or is giving the knowledge of God. It doesn't matter if Jesus was teaching in a temple or in the back ally. did Jesus destroy anyone's property in that back alley or anyplace other than the temple? .... For one EVERYTHING belongs to God, belongs to Jesus. Secondly, no Jesus destroyed nothing. Only turned over a couple tables where they were doing something other then worshipping God. so Jesus has the right to go into people homes and turn over their tables if he is there teaching and they are doing something other than worshipping God umm no. Lol you really go out in left field with a lot of your posts. Jesus wasn't in someone else's house. He was in his father's house and people were doing things they were not to be doing in God's house eg., the church. Other people's home are not specifically for worshipping. There is no bartering in God's house, thus Jesus kicked them out. so Jesus can only turn over tables in his father's house but not anyone else house? Jesus can turn over tables anywhere he dang well pleases lol. But he didn't turn any tables over in anyone elses home, so that is irrelevant. if you can't name anyplace else he turned over something...then don't claim that he had the right to do it because that would be breaking the law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. no I didn't ask you that...I asked was his Father's house the temple where he taught at "totally" irrevelant No, the only thing irrelevant is the LOCATION one is taught about God and or is giving the knowledge of God. It doesn't matter if Jesus was teaching in a temple or in the back ally. did Jesus destroy anyone's property in that back alley or anyplace other than the temple? .... For one EVERYTHING belongs to God, belongs to Jesus. Secondly, no Jesus destroyed nothing. Only turned over a couple tables where they were doing something other then worshipping God. so Jesus has the right to go into people homes and turn over their tables if he is there teaching and they are doing something other than worshipping God umm no. Lol you really go out in left field with a lot of your posts. Jesus wasn't in someone else's house. He was in his father's house and people were doing things they were not to be doing in God's house eg., the church. Other people's home are not specifically for worshipping. There is no bartering in God's house, thus Jesus kicked them out. so Jesus can only turn over tables in his father's house but not anyone else house? Jesus can turn over tables anywhere he dang well pleases lol. But he didn't turn any tables over in anyone elses home, so that is irrelevant. if you can't name anyplace else he turned over something...then don't claim that he had the right to do it because that would be breaking the law Jesus is under no laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? For one, EVERYTHING is God's. For another he through no conniption fit. The things he threw out of the church was not spose to be done in the church. Church is not a place for bartering, or anything other then learning about God and going for worship. oh ....so do you now agree that where Jesus was teaching is relevant?.. No it's not. Jesus taught in many places from the temple to fields. The location doesn't matter, only the message. so the temple being his Father's house was irrelevant? For receiving a message from God, yes it is irrelevant where it is received. no I didn't ask you that...I asked was his Father's house the temple where he taught at "totally" irrevelant No, the only thing irrelevant is the LOCATION one is taught about God and or is giving the knowledge of God. It doesn't matter if Jesus was teaching in a temple or in the back ally. did Jesus destroy anyone's property in that back alley or anyplace other than the temple? .... For one EVERYTHING belongs to God, belongs to Jesus. Secondly, no Jesus destroyed nothing. Only turned over a couple tables where they were doing something other then worshipping God. so Jesus has the right to go into people homes and turn over their tables if he is there teaching and they are doing something other than worshipping God umm no. Lol you really go out in left field with a lot of your posts. Jesus wasn't in someone else's house. He was in his father's house and people were doing things they were not to be doing in God's house eg., the church. Other people's home are not specifically for worshipping. There is no bartering in God's house, thus Jesus kicked them out. so Jesus can only turn over tables in his father's house but not anyone else house? Jesus can turn over tables anywhere he dang well pleases lol. But he didn't turn any tables over in anyone elses home, so that is irrelevant. if you can't name anyplace else he turned over something...then don't claim that he had the right to do it because that would be breaking the law Jesus is under no laws. believing that is what generally got people crucified in those biblical days |
|
|
|
|
