Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: I'm so tired
InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Fri 02/10/12 04:10 AM
We are a country that just loves paying for irresponsibility..

RKISIT Joined Tue 01/08/08 Posts: 16721	Fri 02/10/12 04:43 AM
All i can type about this is,the big insurance companies that sell medical insurance never needed a bail out.They have lobbyist working for them to make damn sure they never do either.

Peccy Joined Thu 06/28/07 Posts: 17181	Fri 02/10/12 08:13 AM
LOL....doesn't suck to be me....I have been in a monogamous relationship for the past four years. I concur with the OP because he's half right in my experience. True it takes two, but in a serious relationship it's the woman who has most of the control. I'm sorry if you have dated men who were forceful and irresponsible. I'm just basing my opinion on personal experience, after all, isn't that all we can do? Everything else is mostly just hearsay and second hand info.

Ladylid2012 Joined Sun 07/05/09 Posts: 42269	Fri 02/10/12 08:34 AM
The woman is the one pregnant not the man, therefore its all her fault! Quit trying to be a jerk!!!

Leigh2154 Joined Sun 10/02/11 Posts: 16479	Fri 02/10/12 08:42 AM
of the federal government telling us what we can and can't do, what we should eat and not eat, it's none of their business. If women want free contraception then they can keep their legs shut. Simple as that. Or....men can keep their zippers up and their wits about them....

Optomistic69 Joined Mon 10/10/11 Posts: 5173	Fri 02/10/12 08:44 AM
of the federal government telling us what we can and can't do, what we should eat and not eat, it's none of their business. If women want free contraception then they can keep their legs shut. Simple as that. You are having a laugh surely........Yes/No

boredinaz06 Joined Sun 10/15/06 Posts: 22764	Fri 02/10/12 08:56 AM
The woman is the one pregnant not the man, therefore its all her fault! Quit trying to be a jerk!!! I was born that way and got bigger

Bushidobillyclub Joined Fri 05/11/07 Posts: 5689	Fri 02/10/12 09:15 AM Edited by Bushidobillyclub on Fri 02/10/12 09:16 AM
Im cool as long as its>>

Chazster Joined Tue 08/28/07 Posts: 6206	Fri 02/10/12 09:19 AM
While men get their Viagra paid for by their insurance, women with a life threatening tubal pregnancy are not covered. That is discrimination pure and simple. Neither of those have to do with contraception or the law he is referring to. Though you previous post... if horny old guys are mad they can buy condoms lol.

boredinaz06 Joined Sun 10/15/06 Posts: 22764	Fri 02/10/12 09:25 AM
I think that if your a doctor or pharmacist and you refuse any sort of medical procedure or prescription because it goes against you religion the medical board should immediately and permanently revoke your license.

Lpdon Joined Thu 02/25/10 Posts: 18772	Fri 02/10/12 09:44 AM
If women want free contraception then they can keep their legs shut. Simple as that. A remark like the above strikes me as extremely disrespectful and sexist towards women. Women get raped by men who think they are entitled to do so. Pass a law that a woman can shoot any man who attempts to rape her or force himself on her then you will insure that a woman who "keeps her legs shut" will not need contraception. Actually a woman can defend herself with lethal force if she is in fear of mortal danger and a lot of rapes end up with the woman being killed so I think it would be justified.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 02/10/12 10:32 AM
I think that if your a doctor or pharmacist and you refuse any sort of medical procedure or prescription because it goes against you religion the medical board should immediately and permanently revoke your license. I agree.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 02/10/12 10:34 AM
We are a country that just loves paying for irresponsibility.. What is that supposed to mean? Insurance didn't hesitate to pay for Viagra to make your Dick hard. Most men don't even know what causes pregnancy.

Optomistic69 Joined Mon 10/10/11 Posts: 5173	Fri 02/10/12 10:37 AM
We are a country that just loves paying for irresponsibility.. What is that supposed to mean? Insurance didn't hesitate to pay for Viagra to make your Dick hard. Most men don't even know what causes pregnancy.

Dragoness Joined Wed 10/17/07 Posts: 23320	Fri 02/10/12 10:42 AM
Again it would suck to be with a man who believes what the OP has spouted off. So I do feel sorry for those women. If a man doesn't want a child he best be doing something to stop it from happening.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 02/10/12 10:45 AM
If women want free contraception then they can keep their legs shut. Simple as that. A remark like the above strikes me as extremely disrespectful and sexist towards women. Women get raped by men who think they are entitled to do so. Pass a law that a woman can shoot any man who attempts to rape her or force himself on her then you will insure that a woman who "keeps her legs shut" will not need contraception. Actually a woman can defend herself with lethal force if she is in fear of mortal danger and a lot of rapes end up with the woman being killed so I think it would be justified. But if I shot a potential rapist, I have to prove his intent was to rape me. That is hard to do unless he had just broke into my house and had me cornered. If I shot him afterwards, they would call it revenge. Date rape? Don't even go there. Who brings a gun with them on a date? That could be called premeditation. But a man always has his weapon with him. I was on a first date with a guy in my youth and I was a virgin. He took me to a secluded spot and told me that if I did not have sex with him that I would have to walk back. I did not know where I was. I got out of the car and started walking with the intention to report him to the authorities. He followed me and begged me to get back into the car that he would take me home. He took me almost home and pulled the car over and tried it again. Can you believe that? I don't consider that to be rape, and I would not want to shoot a guy for that, but if I had a tazer I would have sure used it on him. I can't believe the nerve of some guys. (How dare anyone say that women should just keep her legs together. That is sexist and crude and an insult. It shows blatant disrespect for women.) I wish all women would do just that. Then men could just go screw each other. Show some respect.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 02/10/12 10:47 AM Edited by Jeanniebean on Fri 02/10/12 10:48 AM
While men get their Viagra paid for by their insurance, women with a life threatening tubal pregnancy are not covered. That is discrimination pure and simple. Neither of those have to do with contraception or the law he is referring to. Though you previous post... if horny old guys are mad they can buy condoms lol. TRUE BUT BOTH HAVE TO DO WITH WHAT INSURANCE COMPANIES DECIDE WHAT THEY WILL COVER AND WHAT THEY WILL NOT COVER. For some reason they don't want to cover pregnancy even life threatening pregnancy. Yet they will pay for a pill to make your penis hard. Which is what gets women pregnant. They will load the gun but they will not pay for the damage it causes. Its sexist discrimination.

Chazster Joined Tue 08/28/07 Posts: 6206	Fri 02/10/12 10:49 AM
While men get their Viagra paid for by their insurance, women with a life threatening tubal pregnancy are not covered. That is discrimination pure and simple. Neither of those have to do with contraception or the law he is referring to. Though you previous post... if horny old guys are mad they can buy condoms lol. TRUE BUT BOTH HAVE TO DO WITH WHAT INSURANCE COMPANIES DECIDE WHAT THEY WILL COVER AND WHAT THEY WILL NOT COVER. For some reason they don't want to cover pregnancy even life threatening pregnancy. Yet they will pay for a pill to make your penis hard. Which is what gets women pregnant. They will load the gun but they will not pay for the damage it causes. Its sexist discrimination. Not really. They pay for the pill. Its a cost thing. An abortion is way more expensive so they don't want to cover it. It has nothing to do with sexist. Don't they also cover gynecology?

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 02/10/12 10:57 AM Edited by Jeanniebean on Fri 02/10/12 10:58 AM
While men get their Viagra paid for by their insurance, women with a life threatening tubal pregnancy are not covered. That is discrimination pure and simple. Neither of those have to do with contraception or the law he is referring to. Though you previous post... if horny old guys are mad they can buy condoms lol. TRUE BUT BOTH HAVE TO DO WITH WHAT INSURANCE COMPANIES DECIDE WHAT THEY WILL COVER AND WHAT THEY WILL NOT COVER. For some reason they don't want to cover pregnancy even life threatening pregnancy. Yet they will pay for a pill to make your penis hard. Which is what gets women pregnant. They will load the gun but they will not pay for the damage it causes. Its sexist discrimination. Not really. They pay for the pill. Its a cost thing. An abortion is way more expensive so they don't want to cover it. It has nothing to do with sexist. Don't they also cover gynecology? Some of what insurance covers may have changed since I was in the child bearing age. Back then, they did not cover the pill, or abortion even if you had a tubal pregnancy that threatened your life. I had a friend that payed for insurance and when she got a tubal pregnancy and had to have surgery her insurance would not pay for it. It was life threatening! Shortly after that, Viagra came out and it was all over the news that insurance companies paid for that for men. That is not equal health care.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 02/10/12 11:02 AM Edited by Jeanniebean on Fri 02/10/12 11:03 AM
A woman's life is at stake with a tubal pregnancy and that is not covered by health insurance because it is "a pregnancy." But a man can't get a hard on.... and BOY IS THAT A MAJOR FEAKING CRISIS. Give me a break.