Not true. If God wills it to be done, it will be done. God didn't have sex with Marry or anything of such. Again, all God has to do is will it to be, and it will.

and this is why your God is not perfect...because he is incapable of creating someone of Flesh and Blood that doesn't need to eat food ...

and that is why you are God's boy toy..because he do not have to ask you to be his baby mama ...all he has to do is "Will it"

God using his will to get your pregnant is the way that God have sex...this is the way he pass his Genes and open your Jeans

Every time I come to this thread my "brain" keeps saying think spirituality, then think evolution and its significance to spiritual development....Why?...Adaptability to change......

As humans, we are the most adaptable organism on the planet....Keeping this in mind, compare the rate of human adaptability to the rate of all other living organisms that evolve genetically....The difference will astound you...What takes humans 1,000's of years to adapt to, takes all other living organisms hundreds of millions of years!...This opens the door to the question, why?.... When I contemplate that, I always come back to one thing, spirituality...Humans are spiritual....It's what sets us apart and can only be attributed to a higher power....
For me, this does not mean the scriptures rule, it only means that my individual spirituality (it's level of adaption and it's particular ability to adapt) is what dictates how I, as one individual, choose to live my life.....

yep,break his own laws?

is sex everything you think about? Sure seems that way.

evolution evolves the subconscious...
spirituality/religion stagnates the consciousness

And how does it stagnate the consciousness?

how do you think you got here....do you believe that you magically pop out of nothingness and the stork dropped you down your parent's chimney

no matter which way you chose to spawn your little demons, it's going to take some form of sex to accomplish it

I think you make an excellent scenario for the survival of the fittest point.

Writing in his diary during the Beagle voyage (specifically on January 19, 1836), a young Mr. Darwin records his experiences with a rather odd Australian animal;

In the dusk of the evening I took a stroll along a chain of ponds, which in this dry country represent the course of a river, & had the good fortune to see several of the famous Platypus or Ornithorhyncus paradoxicus. They were diving & playing about the surface of the water; but showed very little of their bodies were visible, so that they only appeared like might easily have been mistaken for many water Rats rats. Mr Browne shot one; certainly it is a most extraordinary animal; the mounted stuffed specimens do not convey a proper idea give at all a good idea of the recent appearance of the head & beak; the latter becoming hard & very contracted & hardened. --
Earlier in the evening A little time before this, I had been lying on a sunny bank & was reflecting on the strange character of the Animals of this country as compared to the rest of the World. An Disbeliever unbeliever in everything beyond his own reason, might exclaim "Surely two distinct Creators must have been [at] work; their object however has been the same & certainly the end in each case the end is complete". -- Whilst thus thinking, I observed the conical pitfall of a Lion-Ant: -- A fly fell in & immediately disappeared; then came a large but unwary Ant; his struggles to escape being very violent, the little jets of sand described by Kirby were promptly directed against him. The pitfall was not above half the size of the one described by Kirby. His fate however was better than that of the poor fly's:- Without a doubt this predacious Larva belongs to the same genus, but to a different species from the Europaean one. -- Now what would the Disbeliever say to this? Would any two workmen ever hit on so beautiful, so simple & yet so artificial a contrivance? It cannot be thought so. -- The one hand has surely worked throughout the universe. A Geologist perhaps would suggest, that the periods of Creation have been distinct & remote the one from the other; that the Creator rested in his labor.

to go against the Church...is to go against God

Incorrect.

To go against the word of God is to against God. A church, as in a building, is man made.

Yeah, my parents had to have had sex to born me, this much is true. But my parents are not God, so the two have absolutely nothing to do with one another.

then why are you a sinner

Because I am imperfect and listen to the wants of the flesh from time to time.

Then the wants of the spirit overcome the wants of the flesh and I repent and ask for forgiveness.

God fertilized an egg just like your parents did ...

Where does it state that God "fertilized" Marry's egg? Where does it state that God placed a penis inside of Marry to empregnate her? It doesn't. It states that she had not known a man eg., she was a virgin and Jesus was born of virgin Marry. Therefore if she was a virgin, no sex happened.

Isaiah 7:14
14Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

and that is why you will always be a sinner and why such beliefs stagnates your consciousness

Again, how does it stagnate my consciousness? Do you know what the word "repent" means? It means to stop doing, or to sustain from doing as such. Which would be not stagnate, for stagnate things don't change, grow, or anything but stay the same.

Jesus was supposed to come from the "seed" of Abraham ...a fertilized seed needs a catalyst generally referred to as the sperm