2 Next
Topic: RP Victims of Sexual Harassment Should Quit
Dragoness's photo
Tue 01/03/12 05:30 PM

Ron Paul on Sunday defended controversial comments he made about AIDS patients in a 1987 book, while also disputing indications from recent polls that his support is slipping in Iowa

The Texas congressman wrote in his book, "Freedom Under Siege," that people with sexually transmitted diseases like AIDS bear some responsibility for their condition and should not burden others with the cost of their care.

"The individual suffering from AIDS certainly is a victim -- frequently a victim of his own lifestyle -- but this same individual victimizes innocent citizens by forcing them to pay for his care," he wrote.


Asked about the comments on "Fox News Sunday," Paul said: "I don't know how you can change science." Sexually transmitted diseases are "caused by sexual activity," he said, and "in a free society people do dumb things, but it isn't to be placed as a burden on other people, innocent people."

"Why should they have to pay for the consequences?" he said.

Paul called that idea a "socialistic attitude" and said insurance companies should determine coverage. "The market should handle this," he said.

The congressman said the law certainly shouldn't deny AIDS patients coverage, but suggested they should be subject to the same considerations insurance companies make for other groups -- like smokers.

"You don't have a right to demand that somebody else take care of you because of your habits," Paul said.

Paul also defended a passage from the same book that suggested victims of sexual harassment should quit.

"They have the right to work there or not work there," he said, adding that federal law does not need to cover sexual harassment as violence in the workplace is already prohibited.

The latest Des Moines Register poll shows Paul in second place in Iowa, trailing Mitt Romney by just 2 points. However, the final two days of polling in the four-day poll show Paul slipping into third place and Rick Santorum moving up into second.

Paul's hands-off approach to foreign policy, as well as controversial writings, such as in his 1987 book and other newsletters which he has since distanced himself from, have drawn criticism in recent weeks.

But Paul said "our numbers aren't going to go down," claiming his supporters are more loyal than the supporters of his competitors.

"They don't desert," he said. "They're not going to leave us, as they have with the other ones ... so I think our numbers will continue to grow, even in these last couple days."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/01/paul-defends-book-passage-on-aids-patients-says-iowa-support-strong/#ixzz1iF990gbl

surprised I suppose he didn't write this book either?rofl


Paul is a dipshyte so what he says really is dismissible as mullarky most of the time.

His desires for anarchy in this country will not happen. He has shown his *** as a racists and a sexist amongst other things

As to aids, they do not know where it started from, in other words they have no clue how it became "humanized" and even though pigs and birds give us the flu every year without any sex involved I guess in order to make it the "evil disease they want to make it, they would have to make it a sexually deviant transmission. But in truth if you care for the truth, it doesn't have to involve sex at all.

heavenlyboy34's photo
Tue 01/03/12 05:48 PM


Ron Paul on Sunday defended controversial comments he made about AIDS patients in a 1987 book, while also disputing indications from recent polls that his support is slipping in Iowa

The Texas congressman wrote in his book, "Freedom Under Siege," that people with sexually transmitted diseases like AIDS bear some responsibility for their condition and should not burden others with the cost of their care.

"The individual suffering from AIDS certainly is a victim -- frequently a victim of his own lifestyle -- but this same individual victimizes innocent citizens by forcing them to pay for his care," he wrote.


Asked about the comments on "Fox News Sunday," Paul said: "I don't know how you can change science." Sexually transmitted diseases are "caused by sexual activity," he said, and "in a free society people do dumb things, but it isn't to be placed as a burden on other people, innocent people."

"Why should they have to pay for the consequences?" he said.

Paul called that idea a "socialistic attitude" and said insurance companies should determine coverage. "The market should handle this," he said.

The congressman said the law certainly shouldn't deny AIDS patients coverage, but suggested they should be subject to the same considerations insurance companies make for other groups -- like smokers.

"You don't have a right to demand that somebody else take care of you because of your habits," Paul said.

Paul also defended a passage from the same book that suggested victims of sexual harassment should quit.

"They have the right to work there or not work there," he said, adding that federal law does not need to cover sexual harassment as violence in the workplace is already prohibited.

The latest Des Moines Register poll shows Paul in second place in Iowa, trailing Mitt Romney by just 2 points. However, the final two days of polling in the four-day poll show Paul slipping into third place and Rick Santorum moving up into second.

Paul's hands-off approach to foreign policy, as well as controversial writings, such as in his 1987 book and other newsletters which he has since distanced himself from, have drawn criticism in recent weeks.

But Paul said "our numbers aren't going to go down," claiming his supporters are more loyal than the supporters of his competitors.

"They don't desert," he said. "They're not going to leave us, as they have with the other ones ... so I think our numbers will continue to grow, even in these last couple days."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/01/paul-defends-book-passage-on-aids-patients-says-iowa-support-strong/#ixzz1iF990gbl

surprised I suppose he didn't write this book either?rofl


Paul is a dipshyte so what he says really is dismissible as mullarky most of the time.

His desires for anarchy in this country will not happen. He has shown his *** as a racists and a sexist amongst other things

As to aids, they do not know where it started from, in other words they have no clue how it became "humanized" and even though pigs and birds give us the flu every year without any sex involved I guess in order to make it the "evil disease they want to make it, they would have to make it a sexually deviant transmission. But in truth if you care for the truth, it doesn't have to involve sex at all.

whoa You know very well that RP is not an anarchist. He is a constitutionalist. Calling someone a "dipshyte" isn't a substitute for an argument. It's just a lame insult.

If you'd actually read the article, you'd know that all he said was "The individual suffering from AIDS certainly is a victim -- frequently a victim of his own lifestyle -- but this same individual victimizes innocent citizens by forcing them to pay for his care,"

This is perfectly rational and factually true. The incidences of AIDS victims who acquired the disease from means other than sex is statistically insignificant.

His point is that insurance companies should set the rates rather than some "insurance czar". This is how healthcare works in the real world. You can't get some major disease and expect an insurance company to give you the rate a well person would get. The insurance company would go broke doing that.

Think through this next time. I know you're smarter than this. Your emotions got the better of you.

2 Next