Topic: Foreign Policy Experts Agree With Ron Paul | |
---|---|
But first he has to show he has nothing to hide, show us his faith so then we can return that faith. A colleague of mine has written a very lengthy FAQ on this issue if you're seriously interested in this. Abstract: For 3 decades, several newsletters ran under Paul's name containing fairly conventionalright-wing commentary for the time. Paul personally distanced himself from production and variousghostwriters came and went. For a brief period, lasting from about 1990-94, a relatively small numberof newsletters were released sporadically which contained racially hateful and “homophobic” remarks.This occurred during a time when Paul had relinquished responsibility for the newsletters ‟operation,retired from Congress and an exhausting Presidential campaign, and consigned himself to working full-time as a medical doctor and public speaker, in addition to raising five children. A few objectionable issues managed to leak out under his nose, quite understandably. Paul did not then and does not now possess superhuman powers. The racist comments fly in the face of everything Paul has ever written and said, as many people who know him personally have attested, and he was angry when he learned of them. He didn't issue a full denial in 1996 when it was first brought up only on the (in retrospectquite bad) advice of his campaign staff. He has in the recent past addressed the issue several times publicly, explicitly denying authorship, and there is every reason to believe it and move on. The rest (22 pages with numerous footnotes) is here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/76280303/PaulNewslettersFaq-Tunk I don't want to read someone's piece. I want to go straight to the source, see the evidence for myself without interpretations or opinions. I was a history major. This is what I am trained to do. Only after I examine the original sources can I place subsequent material in their proper perspective. As of yet, I am still searching for source material because there is too much subsequent material for me to draw a fully objective conclusion. That's why I entered the Ron Paul threads - so I might be referred to the source material. In that light, only the footnotes of the quoted piece may be of use to me. This better be good because trying to find anything these days with all the propaganda circulating is a downright chore. Keep us posted on your findings for I am sure they will be favorable to the good Dr should you succeed. I for one, as you, don't believe "the lesser of evils" is by any means an exceptable choice. The man has defended an unchanged message for 30 years in the face of GREAT adversity, deserving of the title "Dr No" in congress for voting his beliefs in defense of the citizenry over gov't. This is admirable! He has obviously also incurred the wrath of the power mongers (bankers and power elite) who have ridden a gravy train on the backs of the people for a good many decades.....another good sign of his genuine desire to serve the peoples interests! I hope you find what you seek, and should you not, I believe your search will bring you closer to trust and belief in what has been this good mans platform and example. Freedom for all....is not a bias statement Life and liberty..... one size fits all! Happiness....how's that working with what MSM has sold us so far as "the peoples choice". We may disagree on some if not many issues, but I also believe that knowledge is power....NOT money... and campaign donors speak a lot in that regard.... follow the money! Good luck! |
|
|