Topic: Artificial structures on an asteroid? | |
---|---|
I do not see any reason to believe it is artificial. You were talking about the Jesus image that immediately preceded your comment.... right? ![]() |
|
|
|
that's nothin' ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() But i seen better, still.... ![]() I wonder if the photo is real or photoshopped? ![]() |
|
|
|
That looks just like George Harrison.
|
|
|
|
I wonder if the photo is real or photoshopped? ![]() I was assuming it was photoshopped. |
|
|
|
Edited by
metalwing
on
Tue 11/01/11 10:46 AM
|
|
|
|
I wonder if the photo is real or photoshopped? ![]() I was assuming it was photoshopped. I could easily carve a face in a piece of toast. It does not have to be photo shopped. Maybe I could sell it on Ebay for lots of money. |
|
|
|
That's the basic bread and butter in A.E.'s theory of Relativity. It all started with observing that waves move at an equal speed in a given liquid medium, no matter what impacts it at what speed and from what direction. I'm not sure if you are joking or not. They don't actually do that. ![]() gives the celerity of a wave from a force such as wind where c = phase speed; λ = wavelength; d = water depth; g = acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface. Impact waves are different and are governed initially by F=MA. A large impact can create wave celerity of hundreds of miles per hour. The waves would be of various wavelengths and frenquencies with corresponding different celerity. It is my belief and understanding that AE understood wave theory pretty well. Nice equations. Read what I wrote. Waves move at equal speed. This could be many types of waves, and with acceleration or deceleration. If you hit water with two rocks, of unequal masses and with a constant velocity, or of equal masses but different velocities, the waves will be different at speed. But a wave segment from one rock will travel the same speed as the wave segment from the same rock which is not the same segment as the one first considered. (In the same impact.) So the waves will be CIRCULAR. If the waves were of different speeds, thent he wave pattern could be anything. BUT I admit, I made a mistake. The mistake was of improperly paraphrasing an observation AE did. He saw fishing birds, of the diving kind, snatch fish from a lake. He noticed that no matter how fast the birds flew, slowly or speedily, when their wingtips hit the water, the resulting wave formation was circular always, and APPEARED (I don't know how AE said it) to be moving from the centre at a constant speed, each wave, no matter how large and speedy the bird wing tips were that would cause them were. |
|
|
|
Edited by
wux
on
Tue 11/01/11 04:09 PM
|
|
Above: I was not joking. I was just plain wrong. I got in over my head (in the waves). I ventured onto uncharted territories, and I dared unknown waters. I went where many men went before. (The sea. More particularly, the Yellow Sea.)
But most imporantly, I was wrong. I admit. (Is there a "Brown Sea"?) I wonder if the photo is real or photoshopped? ![]() I was assuming it was photoshopped. Why would anyone shop for such a photo? It's available on the Internet for free. |
|
|