100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Get Destroyed | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? You also complain about insults and then you insult. I do have an open mind as I am an engineer and thus a scientist. I haven't found any proof in any Conspiracy theroy for 9-11. Now for those that say the government may have known and done nothing there is no science to disprove that so I can't say its impossible. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Kleisto
on
Mon 08/01/11 01:09 AM
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is absolutely no credible evidence that the 911 attacks were
anything but an Al-Qaida mission. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. why should anyone listen to what you have to say? you have already dismissed everything, without looking at any evidence, then you want to call others names because they do the same to you. your right, there is no evidence that you could post that would change anyones mind, because after 10 years, we have seen all the evidence you could possibly produce. there is NO evidence that remotely says there was any type of conspiracy. Do you think after another 10 years there might be some evidence? lol, good luck with your conspiracys, because they will never go anywhere. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will simply say one thing......follow the money. That is all. that's all you'll say? c'mon man. enlighten us. tell us all about your concerted efforts to, 'follow the money' and what you've learned. or, like me, did you simply hear the term, 'follow the money' before and unlike me you actually bought into the bs? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will simply say one thing......follow the money. That is all. that's all you'll say? c'mon man. enlighten us. tell us all about your concerted efforts to, 'follow the money' and what you've learned. or, like me, did you simply hear the term, 'follow the money' before and unlike me you actually bought into the bs? I'm not sure if you're taking me seriously or not by that statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Kleisto
on
Mon 08/01/11 05:19 AM
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. why should anyone listen to what you have to say? you have already dismissed everything, without looking at any evidence, then you want to call others names because they do the same to you. your right, there is no evidence that you could post that would change anyones mind, because after 10 years, we have seen all the evidence you could possibly produce. there is NO evidence that remotely says there was any type of conspiracy. Do you think after another 10 years there might be some evidence? lol, good luck with your conspiracys, because they will never go anywhere. So says the closed mind.......but whatever if you wanna stay deluded that's your choice. I've had about enough of this quite frankly, the stupid is just too much to take. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. why should anyone listen to what you have to say? you have already dismissed everything, without looking at any evidence, then you want to call others names because they do the same to you. your right, there is no evidence that you could post that would change anyones mind, because after 10 years, we have seen all the evidence you could possibly produce. there is NO evidence that remotely says there was any type of conspiracy. Do you think after another 10 years there might be some evidence? lol, good luck with your conspiracys, because they will never go anywhere. So says the closed mind.......but whatever if you wanna stay deluded that's your choice. I've had about enough of this quite frankly, the stupid is just too much to take. more insults? can't get your way so you have to insult people? remember the pot kettle thing?... hahaha, you lost the argument before it even started.. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. why should anyone listen to what you have to say? you have already dismissed everything, without looking at any evidence, then you want to call others names because they do the same to you. your right, there is no evidence that you could post that would change anyones mind, because after 10 years, we have seen all the evidence you could possibly produce. there is NO evidence that remotely says there was any type of conspiracy. Do you think after another 10 years there might be some evidence? lol, good luck with your conspiracys, because they will never go anywhere. So says the closed mind.......but whatever if you wanna stay deluded that's your choice. I've had about enough of this quite frankly, the stupid is just too much to take. how open minded are you about it not being a conspiracy and it was terrorists and bin Laden? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. You have NO pearls to cast before the swine! the fact is that Pearl Harbor was also considered a Conspiracy by President Roosevelt in the way he handled the Japanese Ambassador delivering the news Japan Declared war on us. That I can suspect but again there is no real tangible proof. the thing is he was a Democratic president who was quoted as saying we needed something like a war to end our economic stalemate. We could beat that point into the ground but the fact remains that had we not have stopped the Axis we would be speaking either Japanese or German today. Now back to the here and now. The WTC was the central point of world business. Why in the hell would the powers that be intentionally destroy their own infrastructure to propagate a war? Why would they risk killing off their own personal especially considering that many people who worked there were handling global business? This reminds me of this incredibly stupid black guy on a construction job I was on who announced he was going to make worker's comp money the easy way and took an air nailer and shot a 16D in his own foot nailing it to the floor. Not only did he grievously injure himself he also wound up in jail and facing criminal fraud charges. I am sorry but the powers that be would not choose such a sensitive target to enrage us. The fact here is that the WTC and Pentagon are both world recognized symbols of America and likewise are targets by hostile powers. Also Islam has a habit of destroying important land marks and installing mosques over other religious holy sites. Another fact is that no one thought anything like this was possible. Well, the powers that be were proved WRONG! Yes there is a conspiracy going on and it is nothing like you or I would expect I think. Frankly you say follow the money trail. Well it all points right to the World Bank. So I bet you are going to demand I elaborate for you. Don't ask me to waste my time. If you can't figure that one out for yourself you are indeed wasting all our time and also are not as smart as you think you are. The conspiracy is that we are all being dragged into a constitutional-less world government under the hypocrites of the United Nations. New World Order is a Corporate Monarchy or is that too hard for you conspiracy nuts to wrap your minds around? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will simply say one thing......follow the money. That is all. that's all you'll say? c'mon man. enlighten us. tell us all about your concerted efforts to, 'follow the money' and what you've learned. or, like me, did you simply hear the term, 'follow the money' before and unlike me you actually bought into the bs? I'm not sure if you're taking me seriously or not by that statement. i'll consider whether or not i'm taking you seriously after i've heard your accounting of your experience to, 'follow the money.' you did follow the money right? how else could you suggest that we all do so if you've not tracked it from it's source to end user? i'm always interested in hearing about actual research data put forth by people like you. what i'm not the least interested in and never take seriously are folks who repeat the same old political and media sound bites such as, 'follow the money.' you either followed the money or you simply repeated what others keep saying who've never followed the money either. but here's your chance to provide me a reason to take you seriously, so have at it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. why should anyone listen to what you have to say? you have already dismissed everything, without looking at any evidence, then you want to call others names because they do the same to you. your right, there is no evidence that you could post that would change anyones mind, because after 10 years, we have seen all the evidence you could possibly produce. there is NO evidence that remotely says there was any type of conspiracy. Do you think after another 10 years there might be some evidence? lol, good luck with your conspiracys, because they will never go anywhere. So says the closed mind.......but whatever if you wanna stay deluded that's your choice. I've had about enough of this quite frankly, the stupid is just too much to take. more insults? can't get your way so you have to insult people? remember the pot kettle thing?... hahaha, you lost the argument before it even started..
dang, now ya done scairt him off afor i got the take on that danged money trail he follered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will simply say one thing......follow the money. That is all. that's all you'll say? c'mon man. enlighten us. tell us all about your concerted efforts to, 'follow the money' and what you've learned. or, like me, did you simply hear the term, 'follow the money' before and unlike me you actually bought into the bs? I'm not sure if you're taking me seriously or not by that statement. i'll consider whether or not i'm taking you seriously after i've heard your accounting of your experience to, 'follow the money.' you did follow the money right? how else could you suggest that we all do so if you've not tracked it from it's source to end user? i'm always interested in hearing about actual research data put forth by people like you. what i'm not the least interested in and never take seriously are folks who repeat the same old political and media sound bites such as, 'follow the money.' you either followed the money or you simply repeated what others keep saying who've never followed the money either. but here's your chance to provide me a reason to take you seriously, so have at it. All I meant by that was, you have to consider who owns and controls the media, that is to say, the elite, your Rockefellers, your Murdochs, your Rothchilds, etc etc. They who run the media also control its' content, as well as well as what ISN'T content. So when I say follow the money, what I am telling you is they who hold it have the power as well, and you can be certain they will use that power to suit their agenda, which is NOT the agenda of the American people at large and never really has been. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. why should anyone listen to what you have to say? you have already dismissed everything, without looking at any evidence, then you want to call others names because they do the same to you. your right, there is no evidence that you could post that would change anyones mind, because after 10 years, we have seen all the evidence you could possibly produce. there is NO evidence that remotely says there was any type of conspiracy. Do you think after another 10 years there might be some evidence? lol, good luck with your conspiracys, because they will never go anywhere. So says the closed mind.......but whatever if you wanna stay deluded that's your choice. I've had about enough of this quite frankly, the stupid is just too much to take. how open minded are you about it not being a conspiracy and it was terrorists and bin Laden? If you could actually prove me wrong I'd be open, but you can't, because you are wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. why should anyone listen to what you have to say? you have already dismissed everything, without looking at any evidence, then you want to call others names because they do the same to you. your right, there is no evidence that you could post that would change anyones mind, because after 10 years, we have seen all the evidence you could possibly produce. there is NO evidence that remotely says there was any type of conspiracy. Do you think after another 10 years there might be some evidence? lol, good luck with your conspiracys, because they will never go anywhere. So says the closed mind.......but whatever if you wanna stay deluded that's your choice. I've had about enough of this quite frankly, the stupid is just too much to take. more insults? can't get your way so you have to insult people? remember the pot kettle thing?... hahaha, you lost the argument before it even started..
dang, now ya done scairt him off afor i got the take on that danged money trail he follered. lol, he'll be back...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. why should anyone listen to what you have to say? you have already dismissed everything, without looking at any evidence, then you want to call others names because they do the same to you. your right, there is no evidence that you could post that would change anyones mind, because after 10 years, we have seen all the evidence you could possibly produce. there is NO evidence that remotely says there was any type of conspiracy. Do you think after another 10 years there might be some evidence? lol, good luck with your conspiracys, because they will never go anywhere. So says the closed mind.......but whatever if you wanna stay deluded that's your choice. I've had about enough of this quite frankly, the stupid is just too much to take. more insults? can't get your way so you have to insult people? remember the pot kettle thing?... hahaha, you lost the argument before it even started..
If the shoe fits........ And I've lost nothing. But whatever dude. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stop the personal attacks. Debate the topic/post but do not attack the poster!!! If you can't debate this topic without the attacks, then simply avoid the topic.
Kim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. why should anyone listen to what you have to say? you have already dismissed everything, without looking at any evidence, then you want to call others names because they do the same to you. your right, there is no evidence that you could post that would change anyones mind, because after 10 years, we have seen all the evidence you could possibly produce. there is NO evidence that remotely says there was any type of conspiracy. Do you think after another 10 years there might be some evidence? lol, good luck with your conspiracys, because they will never go anywhere. So says the closed mind.......but whatever if you wanna stay deluded that's your choice. I've had about enough of this quite frankly, the stupid is just too much to take. more insults? can't get your way so you have to insult people? remember the pot kettle thing?... hahaha, you lost the argument before it even started..
If the shoe fits........ And I've lost nothing. But whatever dude. did i insult you in any way? if i did, i'm sorry, but i'm pretty sure i didn't call anyone any names... only thing i'm asking you is to at least entertain the thought that you could be wrong, i'm wrong about things all the time, all it means is that there is more than one way of looking at something... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. why should anyone listen to what you have to say? you have already dismissed everything, without looking at any evidence, then you want to call others names because they do the same to you. your right, there is no evidence that you could post that would change anyones mind, because after 10 years, we have seen all the evidence you could possibly produce. there is NO evidence that remotely says there was any type of conspiracy. Do you think after another 10 years there might be some evidence? lol, good luck with your conspiracys, because they will never go anywhere. So says the closed mind.......but whatever if you wanna stay deluded that's your choice. I've had about enough of this quite frankly, the stupid is just too much to take. more insults? can't get your way so you have to insult people? remember the pot kettle thing?... hahaha, you lost the argument before it even started..
dang, now ya done scairt him off afor i got the take on that danged money trail he follered. I find it funny how the saying "All roads lead to Rome" fits this argument. What ONE organization actually deals with Global Economy? Where does the money trail ultimately lead to? Who is threatening to remove our national credit rating if we don't raise our debt ceiling? The WORLD BANK IS THAT CONSPIRACY YOU THEORISTS NEVER SEEM TO LOOK AT! They are the one group who plays BOTH sides of all wars! It sickens me how many intellectuals and "enlightened" people cannot see this! They use money to lead nations (people) around buy their noses. Our government is being reduced to a facade to control local populations. Not govern and regulate and protect our national interests. If any one organization is responsible for the 911 attacks though it was ISLAM! Be it in part or in whole it was Islam's Holy war that brought this attack on. The strange thing is that they chose to attack out banking! So what is so strange about that? So if it was an American (Bush Family) conspiracy why would they attack the very people who handle their money and commerce? Again what would it serve them to cut off their own foot? 911 was a terror attack pulled off by Islamic Militants. Now if anything this whole "enemy of my enemy is our friend" thinking is BULLSHITTE. An ally you know will turn on you is no ally. We need to stop these alliances of convenience like Pakistan is with us! it is time these politicians had their careers ended with Term Limitations! But that is a tangent for another thread. 911 was not an American or Bush conspiracy! And like it was said before, follow the money trail. It led right to Al-Quieda and their supporters. if you want to blame anyone for this blame former president CLINTON! Why did that dumba$$ give the Taliban $24 million dollars? He wanted them to stop producing Opium! Did they stop? HELL NO! Clinton gave them an A$$LOAD of money! So who wants to go down the rabbit hole any deeper? Again and one more time, the whole conspiracy theory surrounding 911 is UTTER AND TOTAL BULLSHITTE! if anything I can point my finger at the Democratic Party to blame for leaving us open to that one! Why? They are under some impression money will solve all the world's woes! Sure there is plenty of blame for the failures of our government BUT BUT BUT inventing more blame is unjustifiable! So to all you conspiracy theorists... GET YOUR EYES CHECKED! YOUR MYOPIA IS SHOWING! There is a much larger picture to this you are not seeing. Shall I spell it out in more detail? Who is THE Illuminati? The World Bank! The Global Commodities Exchange. That is who! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean the kid, I mean other people in high places. Like I said, do your research, I'm not gonna do it for you. If you're interested enough you can look up these assassinations for yourself, regarding 9-11 and other things too. Note how earlier he told me to put facts blah blah blah but here he openly says he is not gonna provide us with anything and we have to find stuff ourselves. Yes because if you're too lazy to look up things for yourselves, you obviously don't care enough to bother reading it in the first place. Secondly, if you're gonna put down anything I say as wrong anyway then why SHOULD I give you any facts? Prove to me you have an open mind and then I might, but otherwise I will not cast my pearls before swine. So other people have to provide you with facts but you don't have to provide anything and they are lazy if they don't look it up? Why the double standard? I didn't say other people have to provide me with anything, and yes you are lazy if you don't look it up, because all you need to know is just a few mouse clicks away, and if you aren't willing to do that, you must not want the truth badly enough. Besides all that, I have yet to see a hint of an open mind from either one of you. If you proved to me you were genuinely interested and weren't gonna automatically refute anything I may say cause of your own bias, I may be willing to give you something. But otherwise why should I waste my time on the likes of you? I can better spend it on others who actually WANT the truth, instead of stay deluded. why should anyone listen to what you have to say? you have already dismissed everything, without looking at any evidence, then you want to call others names because they do the same to you. your right, there is no evidence that you could post that would change anyones mind, because after 10 years, we have seen all the evidence you could possibly produce. there is NO evidence that remotely says there was any type of conspiracy. Do you think after another 10 years there might be some evidence? lol, good luck with your conspiracys, because they will never go anywhere. So says the closed mind.......but whatever if you wanna stay deluded that's your choice. I've had about enough of this quite frankly, the stupid is just too much to take. how open minded are you about it not being a conspiracy and it was terrorists and bin Laden? If you could actually prove me wrong I'd be open, but you can't, because you are wrong. There is no proof it is a conspiracy. See just like I said conspiracy nuts feel they "know the truth". If you are certain you don't have an open mind. You claim I am wrong but I never made the same claim. I said there is no evidence to support your theory as far as science is concerned. You are the one trying to disprove the official story. The burden of proof is on the accuser. |
|
|
|
|
