Topic: ex-boyfriend puts up abortion billboard | |
---|---|
So… a man/woman can post on a billboard… -------------------------------------------- My ex is a (profession) Who lives in (city) He/she has (color) hair and (color) eyes He/she will claim to be mad about you and make promises, but don’t be fooled… He/she is actually gay/a lesbian who pretends to be straight And tweets nude photos and cheats with the nanny/maid -------------------------------------------- … or some other vile composition of words that describe your grievance with the person and provides clues to some people (at least possibly those that know you or the person you’re speaking of) about the identity of the person without directly naming them… … and this is perfectly ok because of your right to free speech? I don’t care if he puts up anything for or against abortion/death penalties/end of the world stuff, but putting personal references to another person is taking it a step too far. My ex is unemployeed, lives in Toledo Ohio, has black hair and brown eyes. I guess you know her name now, right? Since there are only about 100,000 people in Toledo who match that description, it's easy for you to figure out, huh? Leftists are so adorable with their pathetic attempts at logic and reason and then insisting that Freedom of Speech is the most important amendment, while trying to take away the people's rights to speak their minds. |
|
|
|
So… a man/woman can post on a billboard… -------------------------------------------- My ex is a (profession) Who lives in (city) He/she has (color) hair and (color) eyes He/she will claim to be mad about you and make promises, but don’t be fooled… He/she is actually gay/a lesbian who pretends to be straight And tweets nude photos and cheats with the nanny/maid -------------------------------------------- … or some other vile composition of words that describe your grievance with the person and provides clues to some people (at least possibly those that know you or the person you’re speaking of) about the identity of the person without directly naming them… … and this is perfectly ok because of your right to free speech? I don’t care if he puts up anything for or against abortion/death penalties/end of the world stuff, but putting personal references to another person is taking it a step too far. is your imagination running wild? where does it say any of that on the billboard? did you even read the article? |
|
|
|
So… a man/woman can post on a billboard… -------------------------------------------- My ex is a (profession) Who lives in (city) He/she has (color) hair and (color) eyes He/she will claim to be mad about you and make promises, but don’t be fooled… He/she is actually gay/a lesbian who pretends to be straight And tweets nude photos and cheats with the nanny/maid -------------------------------------------- … or some other vile composition of words that describe your grievance with the person and provides clues to some people (at least possibly those that know you or the person you’re speaking of) about the identity of the person without directly naming them… … and this is perfectly ok because of your right to free speech? I don’t care if he puts up anything for or against abortion/death penalties/end of the world stuff, but putting personal references to another person is taking it a step too far. is your imagination running wild? where does it say any of that on the billboard? did you even read the article? Yeah, the whole post was a strawman fallacy, but I decided it would be more fun to raise the roof and show how ridiculous her arguments were. |
|
|
|
He sounds like a stand up guy.
http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474979418806 Abortion Billboard Man Greg Fultz's Violent Twitter History June 08, 2011 03:30 AM EDT 2 people recommend this | comments: 2 Greg Fultz, the New Mexico man who took out a billboard to shame his ex-girlfriend for allegedly having an abortion, has a violent, almost psychotic Twitter history. Fultz made news this week when he purchased a billboard in the town of Alamogordo in which he accused his ex-girlfriend of having "killed" his baby. She claims she had a miscarriage and has filed a civil suit to have the billboard taken down, and though a judge has recommended he remove it until a decision can be made, it remains up. Opinion has been divided over his actions. There are some who believe the billboard was in remarkably bad taste, and that Greg Fultz is essentially a jerk for advertising his ex's medical history in public. Others believe that it is within the rights of free speech for him to advertise it, and that it isn't defamatory because the woman is not named in the billboard (though apparently he used her initials on the sign). But new evidence in the form of Greg Fultz's Twitter statements shows that the man shouldn't be felt sorry for in the least. He's a disgusting, grade A jerk (among other adjectives which can't be printed here). He relishes in the embarrassment of his ex-girlfriend, is smug about the legal case against him, and exhibits a chilling enjoyment of graphic violence against women. Under the Twitter handle "prdpgn" he has issued the following statements: "What do you tell a woman with two black eyes? Nothing. She's already been told twice." "What does a battered woman do when she comes home from the hospital? The dishes, if she knows what's good for her." "What do you do if you see your ex running around in your front yard covered in blood and screaming for help? Stay calm, reload, & try again." "It's not that I regret meeting you, it's that I regret not running you over with my car before you walked out on me." Fultz demonstrates a love of violence against women that makes it all too clear that his billboard antics were meant with the deepest of malice. His ex was lucky to be rid of him, and frankly it's all the better that any potential child of his remains unborn. Who knows what other types of violence Greg Fultz is a fan of? |
|
|
|
Edited by
singmesweet
on
Wed 06/08/11 08:36 AM
|
|
http://abcnews.go.com/US/abortion-billboard-lands-mexico-man-court-girlfriend/story?id=13783668
A New Mexico man said today he will fight to keep up a controversial billboard that suggested his ex-girlfriend had an abortion. The billboard has a photo ofGreg Fultz holding the outline of a baby with a playground in the background. The large text beside the photo reads, "This Would Have Been a Picture Of My 2-Month Old Baby If The Mother Had Decided To NOT KILL Our Child!" The sign is on White Sands Boulevard, the main thoroughfare in Alamogordo, N.M., and has been up since mid-May. Fultz's ex-girlfriend Nani Lawrence took him to court with a petition for domestic violence and charges of harassment and invasion of privacy. Fultz, 35, claims that Lawrence was pregnant with his child during their six-month relationship last year. He admits that when the relationship ended, the baby was lost, but he does not know whether it was due to an abortion or a miscarriage. Fultz says that Lawrence would not tell him what happened. Fultz maintains that the billboard was part of a greater message and was not aimed at his ex-girlfriend. He does admit, however, that the idea was "inspired" by events in his own life. "My original intentions when I started this campaign were quite simple," Fultz said. "I just wanted to shed the light on pro-life issues and fathers' rights. I have had no closure over my own personal loss and that's where the billboard came into play." Last week, Otero County Domestic Violence Court hearing commissioner Darrell Brantley recommended an order of protection for Lawrence and that the billboard be removed by 8:14 a.m. on June 17 on the grounds of harassment. Judge James W. Counts is expected to approve these recommendations, but his office says they cannot comment on pending cases. Fultz's attorney Todd Holmes said the court commissioner has stated he will recommend jail time if Fultz does not remove the billboard by June 17. They are planning on objecting to the ruling. When asked if he is going to take down his sign, Fultz replied, "No. I will fight this until I have no other options. I'm standing up for what I believe in. I'm hoping it doesn't come to that, but I will do whatever I have to do to keep my legal message up there." Holmes argues that the lawsuit is a violation of his client's right to free speech. "Our solid position is that it's protected by the First Amendment," Holmes said. "A lot of offensive, distasteful speech seems like it might be harassment, but it's still protected." Holmes cites the recent Supreme Court decision in favor of the Westboro Baptist Church, notorious for its anti-gay rallies and protesting at military funerals. The court ruled that the activities are protected by the First Amendment's right to free speech. Lawrence could not be reached for comment, but her lawyer Ellen Jessen told the Alamogordo Daily News, "I think Fultz's right to free speech ends where Nani Lawrence's right to privacy begins. ... We have to balance one's right to free speech against one's right to free speech." The original billboard had two endorsements that have since been removed. The first was from N.A.N.I., an organization Fultz created for pro-life issues that stands for National Association for Needed Information. The acronym also happens to be his ex-girlfriend's first name. After a few weeks, Fultz removed N.A.N.I. due to the controversy distracting people from the intended message, he says. A pro-life organization called Right to Life New Mexico had also originally endorsed Fultz's billboard and given their permission for him to use their logo. However, they pulled their endorsement when they discovered that Fultz was unsure whether Lawrence had an abortion or miscarriage. The billboard cost $1,300, paid for by Fultz with the help of donations. Fultz says that the donations came from various individuals who heard about his plan, not from any businesses or other pro-life or organizations. The GEFNET endorsement on the billboard is from Fultz's own business. |
|
|
|
interesting info Emily.....
golly, wonder why it was only a 6 month relationship. She was probably frightened her baby would have psycho genes... I don't understand how anyone could make make such 'jokes' about abuse, he must really hate his mother. |
|
|
|
Hypocrisy is saying that a woman has a right to do what she wants to her body and then insists that also means she can kill her unborn children. Cross your legs and stop putting out if you don't want kids, okay? Ummm, no. Hypocrisy is saying that a woman has the right to do what she wants with and to her body, but NOT to the point of terminating a pregnancy. |
|
|
|
My ex is unemployeed, lives in Toledo Ohio, has black hair and brown eyes. I guess you know her name now, right? Since there are only about 100,000 people in Toledo who match that description, it's easy for you to figure out, huh? So, have you dated 100,000 people? Because if you put up a sign with your picture and the description, even without naming that person, it would technically narrow it down to a FAR fewer amount of women fitting that description who actually dated you. |
|
|
|
http://abcnews.go.com/US/abortion-billboard-lands-mexico-man-court-girlfriend/story?id=13783668 A New Mexico man said today he will fight to keep up a controversial billboard that suggested his ex-girlfriend had an abortion. The billboard has a photo ofGreg Fultz holding the outline of a baby with a playground in the background. The large text beside the photo reads, "This Would Have Been a Picture Of My 2-Month Old Baby If The Mother Had Decided To NOT KILL Our Child!" The sign is on White Sands Boulevard, the main thoroughfare in Alamogordo, N.M., and has been up since mid-May. Fultz's ex-girlfriend Nani Lawrence took him to court with a petition for domestic violence and charges of harassment and invasion of privacy. Fultz, 35, claims that Lawrence was pregnant with his child during their six-month relationship last year. He admits that when the relationship ended, the baby was lost, but he does not know whether it was due to an abortion or a miscarriage. Fultz says that Lawrence would not tell him what happened. Fultz maintains that the billboard was part of a greater message and was not aimed at his ex-girlfriend. He does admit, however, that the idea was "inspired" by events in his own life. "My original intentions when I started this campaign were quite simple," Fultz said. "I just wanted to shed the light on pro-life issues and fathers' rights. I have had no closure over my own personal loss and that's where the billboard came into play." Last week, Otero County Domestic Violence Court hearing commissioner Darrell Brantley recommended an order of protection for Lawrence and that the billboard be removed by 8:14 a.m. on June 17 on the grounds of harassment. Judge James W. Counts is expected to approve these recommendations, but his office says they cannot comment on pending cases. Fultz's attorney Todd Holmes said the court commissioner has stated he will recommend jail time if Fultz does not remove the billboard by June 17. They are planning on objecting to the ruling. When asked if he is going to take down his sign, Fultz replied, "No. I will fight this until I have no other options. I'm standing up for what I believe in. I'm hoping it doesn't come to that, but I will do whatever I have to do to keep my legal message up there." Holmes argues that the lawsuit is a violation of his client's right to free speech. "Our solid position is that it's protected by the First Amendment," Holmes said. "A lot of offensive, distasteful speech seems like it might be harassment, but it's still protected." Holmes cites the recent Supreme Court decision in favor of the Westboro Baptist Church, notorious for its anti-gay rallies and protesting at military funerals. The court ruled that the activities are protected by the First Amendment's right to free speech. Lawrence could not be reached for comment, but her lawyer Ellen Jessen told the Alamogordo Daily News, "I think Fultz's right to free speech ends where Nani Lawrence's right to privacy begins. ... We have to balance one's right to free speech against one's right to free speech." The original billboard had two endorsements that have since been removed. The first was from N.A.N.I., an organization Fultz created for pro-life issues that stands for National Association for Needed Information. The acronym also happens to be his ex-girlfriend's first name. After a few weeks, Fultz removed N.A.N.I. due to the controversy distracting people from the intended message, he says. A pro-life organization called Right to Life New Mexico had also originally endorsed Fultz's billboard and given their permission for him to use their logo. However, they pulled their endorsement when they discovered that Fultz was unsure whether Lawrence had an abortion or miscarriage. The billboard cost $1,300, paid for by Fultz with the help of donations. Fultz says that the donations came from various individuals who heard about his plan, not from any businesses or other pro-life or organizations. The GEFNET endorsement on the billboard is from Fultz's own business. Real nice guy, and now admits he doesn't know if she did have a miscarriage or not. |
|
|
|
This is terrible. He had no problem with her, when he was cumming all up inside her.....who cares what she did with his baby, out of sight and out of mind, she couldve never bothered telling him she was pregnant anyways. There are just as many men willing to trap a woman with child as vice versa, and these are controlling men who take without asking...
It's clear by those tweets, he mas major issues.... Freedom of speech is fine, but I hope he did not name names or post faces, I dont know if he did or not. |
|
|
|
Don't date any pro-choice women. Great advice. I would never have thought of just not dating insecticidal women. Thanks a bunch! |
|
|
|
Alternativa, that apparently is exactly okay. Keep it vague enough and you can tell the world everything. Nice huh? Of course, this really shouldn't be a surprise considering people maliciously upload sex photos of each other when they break-up. Spider, now you know something you need to discuss with any future potential girlfriends. Don't date any pro-choice women. Simple. Then, instead, you can gripe about any kids you get stuck paying for after the relationship ends. :-) Sorry, but no one is going to tell me what I can and cannot do with my body. I don't tell a man what he can do, and I deserve the same respect. You do realize that the reason poor folks are more likely to have abortions is because they aren't able to get birth control and protection to PREVENT pregnancies before they happen, right? The hypocrisy of this amazes me. I'd rather pay child support than have the murder of my child on my conscience. Obviously you love money more than human life, typical leftist. Condoms are free at many of the free clinics around the country. They are free in some schools. They are free from Planned Parenthood. Get a new script, this one is really old. Hypocrisy is saying that a woman has a right to do what she wants to her body and then insists that also means she can kill her unborn children. Cross your legs and stop putting out if you don't want kids, okay? Wear a condom or stop putting out, so you don't have to deal with this kind of situation in the future? |
|
|
|
If I was playing the License Plate Game, I would guess his Tweet Name was------PROUD PAGAN ??? PRDPGN???
|
|
|
|
Don't date any pro-choice women. Great advice. I would never have thought of just not dating insecticidal women. Thanks a bunch! Grrrr...That's supposed to say "infanticidal" |
|
|
|
So… a man/woman can post on a billboard… -------------------------------------------- My ex is a (profession) Who lives in (city) He/she has (color) hair and (color) eyes He/she will claim to be mad about you and make promises, but don’t be fooled… He/she is actually gay/a lesbian who pretends to be straight And tweets nude photos and cheats with the nanny/maid -------------------------------------------- … or some other vile composition of words that describe your grievance with the person and provides clues to some people (at least possibly those that know you or the person you’re speaking of) about the identity of the person without directly naming them… … and this is perfectly ok because of your right to free speech? I don’t care if he puts up anything for or against abortion/death penalties/end of the world stuff, but putting personal references to another person is taking it a step too far. except there is no actual reference to 'my ex',, that is something we have assumed the post refers to 'the mother',, which could be any woman that shared a bed with him 11 months ago |
|
|
|
http://abcnews.go.com/US/abortion-billboard-lands-mexico-man-court-girlfriend/story?id=13783668 A New Mexico man said today he will fight to keep up a controversial billboard that suggested his ex-girlfriend had an abortion. The billboard has a photo ofGreg Fultz holding the outline of a baby with a playground in the background. The large text beside the photo reads, "This Would Have Been a Picture Of My 2-Month Old Baby If The Mother Had Decided To NOT KILL Our Child!" The sign is on White Sands Boulevard, the main thoroughfare in Alamogordo, N.M., and has been up since mid-May. Fultz's ex-girlfriend Nani Lawrence took him to court with a petition for domestic violence and charges of harassment and invasion of privacy. Fultz, 35, claims that Lawrence was pregnant with his child during their six-month relationship last year. He admits that when the relationship ended, the baby was lost, but he does not know whether it was due to an abortion or a miscarriage. Fultz says that Lawrence would not tell him what happened. Fultz maintains that the billboard was part of a greater message and was not aimed at his ex-girlfriend. He does admit, however, that the idea was "inspired" by events in his own life. "My original intentions when I started this campaign were quite simple," Fultz said. "I just wanted to shed the light on pro-life issues and fathers' rights. I have had no closure over my own personal loss and that's where the billboard came into play." Last week, Otero County Domestic Violence Court hearing commissioner Darrell Brantley recommended an order of protection for Lawrence and that the billboard be removed by 8:14 a.m. on June 17 on the grounds of harassment. Judge James W. Counts is expected to approve these recommendations, but his office says they cannot comment on pending cases. Fultz's attorney Todd Holmes said the court commissioner has stated he will recommend jail time if Fultz does not remove the billboard by June 17. They are planning on objecting to the ruling. When asked if he is going to take down his sign, Fultz replied, "No. I will fight this until I have no other options. I'm standing up for what I believe in. I'm hoping it doesn't come to that, but I will do whatever I have to do to keep my legal message up there." Holmes argues that the lawsuit is a violation of his client's right to free speech. "Our solid position is that it's protected by the First Amendment," Holmes said. "A lot of offensive, distasteful speech seems like it might be harassment, but it's still protected." Holmes cites the recent Supreme Court decision in favor of the Westboro Baptist Church, notorious for its anti-gay rallies and protesting at military funerals. The court ruled that the activities are protected by the First Amendment's right to free speech. Lawrence could not be reached for comment, but her lawyer Ellen Jessen told the Alamogordo Daily News, "I think Fultz's right to free speech ends where Nani Lawrence's right to privacy begins. ... We have to balance one's right to free speech against one's right to free speech." The original billboard had two endorsements that have since been removed. The first was from N.A.N.I., an organization Fultz created for pro-life issues that stands for National Association for Needed Information. The acronym also happens to be his ex-girlfriend's first name. After a few weeks, Fultz removed N.A.N.I. due to the controversy distracting people from the intended message, he says. A pro-life organization called Right to Life New Mexico had also originally endorsed Fultz's billboard and given their permission for him to use their logo. However, they pulled their endorsement when they discovered that Fultz was unsure whether Lawrence had an abortion or miscarriage. The billboard cost $1,300, paid for by Fultz with the help of donations. Fultz says that the donations came from various individuals who heard about his plan, not from any businesses or other pro-life or organizations. The GEFNET endorsement on the billboard is from Fultz's own business. he is a jerk, but being a jerk isnt illegal and its interesting, that he created an organization with her name as acronym and even more interesting that she comes forward to essentially, VERIFY that it was her and bring more attention to herself,,, |
|
|
|
So… a man/woman can post on a billboard… -------------------------------------------- My ex is a (profession) Who lives in (city) He/she has (color) hair and (color) eyes He/she will claim to be mad about you and make promises, but don’t be fooled… He/she is actually gay/a lesbian who pretends to be straight And tweets nude photos and cheats with the nanny/maid -------------------------------------------- … or some other vile composition of words that describe your grievance with the person and provides clues to some people (at least possibly those that know you or the person you’re speaking of) about the identity of the person without directly naming them… … and this is perfectly ok because of your right to free speech? I don’t care if he puts up anything for or against abortion/death penalties/end of the world stuff, but putting personal references to another person is taking it a step too far. Ya, what ever happened to just pouring Sugar into someones gas tank or rice in their radiator? |
|
|