100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: More Potential Terrorist Attacks, Obama Does Nothing | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
The only way to war with terror is to war with all nations. All nations have terrorists including us. Foiled terrorist attacks are a good sign. Complacency is what allowed 9/11. We go after ALL our domestic terrorists head on. Why do you think we took down weathermen underground or have a ton of criminal prosecutions against members of ALF and ELF? Or how about the needle that wen't into McVeigh's arm? We are at war with terror on many fronts and many agencies other then the military are dealing with it too. We need to fight it on ALL fronts where ever it is. If it's in places like Yemeni or Pakistani tribal regions we can't exactly send the FBI, NCIS, DSS or any other federal law enforcement agency in after them thats where the military comes in. Because there are terrorists in a country, doesn't make that country our enemy, nor take away that countries sovereignty. Because if it did, we should have our ***** kicked too. It makes us illegal tyrants to go around invading countries because we don't like a terrorist in their midst. No but when NATO and the UN declared 9/11 an act of war and Washington promised to go after ANY country aiding the terrorists behind it makes it legal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for every person whom cries murder be the answer to crime, doth not deserve life itself, nor to live in a civilized society.
some people watch too much tv, and have infused their brain as one with their television sets. these should be chained naked as a dog in town square, and fed dogfood and water for 30 days, to cure them of their insufferable self pride and god complex that scream for blood and vengence, and turn themself into the very thing they claim to despise. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kinda of hard for the President to deal with Islamic terrorism since he refuses to acknowledge it even exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
davidben1
on
Mon 11/01/10 11:03 PM
|
|
maybe he's wise enough not to listen to a bunch of blood thirsty zombies, whom demand blood until it come to their own.
those that demand blood are the largest cowards, and cry and beg like babies when it comes time to be waterboarded themself, or neck hacked off their body. it used to be we had armchair quaterbacks, who dictated themself as great in their own brains, having never played a NFL professional game of football, but now in even more advanced primitive society, we have armchair murders and war monger's, whom delight in their fantasy of themself as private investigators, and as presidents, and as war generals, commandeering their troops with swelling self greatness, to make ready for the killings. napolean doth wear high heels. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
maybe he's wise enough not to listen to a bunch of blood thirsty zombies, whom demand blood until it come to their own. those that demand blood are the largest cowards, and cry and beg like babies when it comes time to be waterboarded themself, or neck hacked off their body. it used to be we had armchair quaterbacks, who dictated themself as great in their own brains, having never played a NFL professional game of football, but now in even more advanced primitive society, we have armchair murders and war monger's, whom delight in their fantasy of themself as private investigators, and as presidents, and as war generals, commandeering their troops with swelling self greatness, to make ready for the killings. napolean doth wear high heels. you seem to have it all figured out... the torture, football, detectives... so your against all these things, but yet you want it done to your friends and neighbors, the people that would be on your side in a crisis or war... real smart... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
maybe he's wise enough not to listen to a bunch of blood thirsty zombies, whom demand blood until it come to their own. those that demand blood are the largest cowards, and cry and beg like babies when it comes time to be waterboarded themself, or neck hacked off their body. it used to be we had armchair quaterbacks, who dictated themself as great in their own brains, having never played a NFL professional game of football, but now in even more advanced primitive society, we have armchair murders and war monger's, whom delight in their fantasy of themself as private investigators, and as presidents, and as war generals, commandeering their troops with swelling self greatness, to make ready for the killings. napolean doth wear high heels. you seem to have it all figured out... the torture, football, detectives... so your against all these things, but yet you want it done to your friends and neighbors, the people that would be on your side in a crisis or war... real smart... indeed, i DON'T want it done to my friends and neighbors, which be precisly why i stand against it. it does not take killing or physical torture to tame the pride, and change the "want" of another, that make these committ the action's of violence that create unrest and unpeace for all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only way to war with terror is to war with all nations. All nations have terrorists including us. Foiled terrorist attacks are a good sign. Complacency is what allowed 9/11. We go after ALL our domestic terrorists head on. Why do you think we took down weathermen underground or have a ton of criminal prosecutions against members of ALF and ELF? Or how about the needle that wen't into McVeigh's arm? We are at war with terror on many fronts and many agencies other then the military are dealing with it too. We need to fight it on ALL fronts where ever it is. If it's in places like Yemeni or Pakistani tribal regions we can't exactly send the FBI, NCIS, DSS or any other federal law enforcement agency in after them thats where the military comes in. Because there are terrorists in a country, doesn't make that country our enemy, nor take away that countries sovereignty. Because if it did, we should have our ***** kicked too. It makes us illegal tyrants to go around invading countries because we don't like a terrorist in their midst. No but when NATO and the UN declared 9/11 an act of war and Washington promised to go after ANY country aiding the terrorists behind it makes it legal. Really... Does it hold up in another soverign nation? Suppose that Mexico got tired of the 'terrorists' that call themselves Drug Lords... Suppose further that because of being tired of these 'terrorists' they stated that they would persue them into any country on earth. Would you consider it legal if they invaded say... Texas, to 'chase' their 'enemy'. Washington did not promise anything. The President did. Congress was to busy slapping each other on the hindside or spitting in each others eyes to actually look up and see the danger for what it was. (just to refresh your memory - congress is part of WASHINGTON when one mentions it as a seat of government). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only way to war with terror is to war with all nations. All nations have terrorists including us. Foiled terrorist attacks are a good sign. Complacency is what allowed 9/11. We go after ALL our domestic terrorists head on. Why do you think we took down weathermen underground or have a ton of criminal prosecutions against members of ALF and ELF? Or how about the needle that wen't into McVeigh's arm? We are at war with terror on many fronts and many agencies other then the military are dealing with it too. We need to fight it on ALL fronts where ever it is. If it's in places like Yemeni or Pakistani tribal regions we can't exactly send the FBI, NCIS, DSS or any other federal law enforcement agency in after them thats where the military comes in. Because there are terrorists in a country, doesn't make that country our enemy, nor take away that countries sovereignty. Because if it did, we should have our ***** kicked too. It makes us illegal tyrants to go around invading countries because we don't like a terrorist in their midst. No but when NATO and the UN declared 9/11 an act of war and Washington promised to go after ANY country aiding the terrorists behind it makes it legal. Really... Does it hold up in another soverign nation? Suppose that Mexico got tired of the 'terrorists' that call themselves Drug Lords... Suppose further that because of being tired of these 'terrorists' they stated that they would persue them into any country on earth. Would you consider it legal if they invaded say... Texas, to 'chase' their 'enemy'. Washington did not promise anything. The President did. Congress was to busy slapping each other on the hindside or spitting in each others eyes to actually look up and see the danger for what it was. (just to refresh your memory - congress is part of WASHINGTON when one mentions it as a seat of government).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thes threads more and more make me a proponent of ending political 'parties',,, I sure would love for those in washington to just be working towards a common goal of a better america
instead of playing the us vs them game,,,,, I do tire of 'republicans' blaming 'dems' and 'dems' blaming 'republicans when in reality they all work and sign those papers TOGETHER,,,, |
|
|
|
|
