like posting a known doctored picture of a vice presidential candidate?

if something is posted to mislead,,,,,whatever it is,,,

http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/11/16/msnbc-apologizes-for-showing-fake-palin-photos/?cxntfid=blogs_jay_bookman_blog

it is sheer lunacy, and reverting to past tyrannical and dictaterous methods, and indeed primitive, to try to restrict content intake, to reduce violence.

did not john lennon's assassin define "catcher in the rye", with his own diluted mind, blaming it as the motivation for killing lennon, as did many many other's guilty of murder or the attempted murder of other leader's, whose voices within society they DID NOT LIKE?

so, these had a root first desire, so motivation, beleiving that it be good and well, and for the common good, to control all other perception's to think as themself?

are these not personalities that despise anything that question their logic or thought process or reasoning?

it seems this be paramount to recognize when rehabilitating the controlling personality that is prone to force and violence?

for the censorship offered in this thread, to be the answer to the plight and resolution of violence, than ALL READING MATERIAL, would have to be REMOVED from society?

hum...

sounds familiar to third world dictatorships?

the only way to reduce this trend of increased and heightened extremism within any "feeling" society, is to REDUCE THE SEVERITY OF SPEECH?

for the more it is deemed that words are RIGHTFULLY CONSIDERED AS OFFENSIVE, and EVIL, the more power has been given to words to create evil, or less than good action's within a populous?

who in their right mind would not recognize such tactic's as censorship as control freaks trying to control other's?

using fear and illusionary comparisons to envoke themself INTO POWER, being overlords over what all other SHOULD READ, AND WATCH, AND SEE, AND HEAR?

omg, how is that any solution except the very recipe that created the violence in the first place?

please, only the extremely narrow sighted, staring thru their own perception as KING OR QUEEEN, would even fall prey to such whim's as feelings within themself, and believe such practices should RULE THE WORLD?

what of all the violent video games?

what all the violent television show's?

what about all the movie's portraying real life events of lie's, and decpetion, and violence?

what of all the fairy tales depicting any manner of things?

alice in wonderland, gone?

the three little pigs, gone?

why the three little pigs could be contrued to be a "secret book", that tell of the corruption of the fat and greedy, whom built a empire on sand, lol...

many diluded proving their own perception as supreme, could teach the children such things, and raise hate filled anarchists?

of ocurse, all religious material's would have to be removed from planet earth, for certainnly it cannot be missed, that religion envoke many more to motivation, than doth the purported new's cast, as the religious belief first decide the outlook of the one watching the news, lol...

hum...

for it is only but to be able to apply a theory of solution, in total reality, and using all true logistic's of implementing, that easily show if such actually be solution?

is it not the "state of being", of any individual, that decide how oneself shall define what it see and hear's?

so then, this is what any human shall allow to decide what control it's own behaviour?

so there is no doubt, that what cries for censorship, does wish it's OWN PERCEPTION, AND AGENDA, TO RULE OVER ALL THE REST OF MANKIND?

and these purport they are lover's of freedom, and of democracy, and patriotic?

such is the exact opposite of any such thing called patriotic, or freedom, or equal rights for all.

even more, the president or governing body of any free nation, should never endorse such practice or tactic's, even if the "feelings" are so tempted to do so?

for it is the voice of ALL THE PEOPLE HEARD, that CONSTRUCT THE FOUNDATION OF ANYTHING CALLED FREEDOM?

the voice of the crier of censorship, if allowed to become accepted as good method, and worse if becoming passed into law, shall always doom any free society to dictatorship and oppression of all as one?

if these that wish for censorship, be given the opportunity to aquire it, then shall not such become validated, and so create into existence the use of force, to shut up another?

is that not what wee children in grade school were supposed to learn was not good?

such has always been the trend of primitive societies and primitive minds, in the attempts to control, citing and prommoting it as cures for violence?

we all know, that news be spoken by a voice, which come from a human, that has feelings, so believing that any human acts and speaks not thru their "feelings" is of absolutely no merit.

the thought process of the individual that hear data, decide what be gleaned from any data?

if society does not reverse the current trend of defining more and more as hate speech, then more and more violence shall become created.

I wish Orson Wells was still alive!

oh man..he was soooo coool..

captain hero decoder rings were pretty cool too,,,,

it is but trying to put a lid on people's minds, deeming what is acceptable and not acceptable to such an extreme degree, going far beyond the basic principle of law only being to not inflict bodily harm on any other, (that does not wish for it) that has deteriorated the creativity of humankind itself.