100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: hatred for republicans =) | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
actually, if more people VOTED for those independents , they would have a better chance I think we do get, in large part, what we ask for We didnt ask for the Coward in Chief Obama. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
simple as this being he got into it and made money a lot of money on it was still making money obviously won't get out of it becaause of the money they still make simple psychology my friend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seakolony i completely agree with your last statement due to political pressure as well as our family pressure and our own self doubt how many people actually vote for the real person they want in office and this includes the candidates that never even entered the pole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
politicians dont "create" a nation, they merely represent it...I would suggest that the problem isnt really the elected officials but has more to do with the people who cast the votes in the first place. Really? Why docha just tell us who to vote for since you are the authority on US politics.....maybe you should try chosing between the lesser of two evils over the best man for the job bcs apparently the best man for the job doesn't seem to be throwing his/her hat in the ring? And since Independents do not get a vote in the primaries and the only way to vote in primaries is to register as a Rep or Dem......in your wisened look from outside in give us your very politcally "accurate" view......but personally I just think you make remarks of which you know nothing about....the bill on captiol hill is a source of problematic pork bellying for financial gains.....so even the stuff we want piggy backs the stuff we don't and they call it politics..... Im no authority...but I do know that more people voted for American Idol (and were much more informed about who and why they voted ) than the last presidential election...I think that says plenty about your system...lesser of two evils you say...? try lesser of 700 evils (thats about how many political parties there are in my country)...people just throw up their hands and say "thats how the system works"..and its true, because "we" allow it to happen... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
politicians dont "create" a nation, they merely represent it...I would suggest that the problem isnt really the elected officials but has more to do with the people who cast the votes in the first place. Really? Why docha just tell us who to vote for since you are the authority on US politics.....maybe you should try chosing between the lesser of two evils over the best man for the job bcs apparently the best man for the job doesn't seem to be throwing his/her hat in the ring? And since Independents do not get a vote in the primaries and the only way to vote in primaries is to register as a Rep or Dem......in your wisened look from outside in give us your very politcally "accurate" view......but personally I just think you make remarks of which you know nothing about....the bill on captiol hill is a source of problematic pork bellying for financial gains.....so even the stuff we want piggy backs the stuff we don't and they call it politics..... Im no authority...but I do know that more people voted for American Idol (and were much more informed about who and why they voted ) than the last presidential election...I think that says plenty about your system...lesser of two evils you say...? try lesser of 700 evils (thats about how many political parties there are in my country)...people just throw up their hands and say "thats how the system works"..and its true, because "we" allow it to happen... Be grateful you have 700 to chose and research rather than two..........would be better if all candidates went to national vote instead of one figurehead per party at least we might get a true opinion in the end......don't you think two is limited....znd who says the people eliminated in primaries might not make by the time everything is said and done if it was one national vote of all candidates putting their hat in the ring.....I personally would prefer it....but that is me.....I think it would show more what the country really wants in the end instead of placing all the eggs in one basket.....doncha think |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well maybe if we televised the presidency as from a more advertising level in stead of such secret buisness as usual more people would react to it more instead of how well someone can sing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actually, if more people VOTED for those independents , they would have a better chance I think we do get, in large part, what we ask for We didnt ask for the Coward in Chief Obama. Oh yea we did! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
politicians dont "create" a nation, they merely represent it...I would suggest that the problem isnt really the elected officials but has more to do with the people who cast the votes in the first place. Really? Why docha just tell us who to vote for since you are the authority on US politics.....maybe you should try chosing between the lesser of two evils over the best man for the job bcs apparently the best man for the job doesn't seem to be throwing his/her hat in the ring? And since Independents do not get a vote in the primaries and the only way to vote in primaries is to register as a Rep or Dem......in your wisened look from outside in give us your very politcally "accurate" view......but personally I just think you make remarks of which you know nothing about....the bill on captiol hill is a source of problematic pork bellying for financial gains.....so even the stuff we want piggy backs the stuff we don't and they call it politics..... Im no authority...but I do know that more people voted for American Idol (and were much more informed about who and why they voted ) than the last presidential election...I think that says plenty about your system...lesser of two evils you say...? try lesser of 700 evils (thats about how many political parties there are in my country)...people just throw up their hands and say "thats how the system works"..and its true, because "we" allow it to happen... Not voting means you don't care who is governing you. So don't ***** about what they do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actually, if more people VOTED for those independents , they would have a better chance I think we do get, in large part, what we ask for We didnt ask for the Coward in Chief Obama. Oh yea we did! No WE didn't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
politicians dont "create" a nation, they merely represent it...I would suggest that the problem isnt really the elected officials but has more to do with the people who cast the votes in the first place. Really? Why docha just tell us who to vote for since you are the authority on US politics.....maybe you should try chosing between the lesser of two evils over the best man for the job bcs apparently the best man for the job doesn't seem to be throwing his/her hat in the ring? And since Independents do not get a vote in the primaries and the only way to vote in primaries is to register as a Rep or Dem......in your wisened look from outside in give us your very politcally "accurate" view......but personally I just think you make remarks of which you know nothing about....the bill on captiol hill is a source of problematic pork bellying for financial gains.....so even the stuff we want piggy backs the stuff we don't and they call it politics..... Im no authority...but I do know that more people voted for American Idol (and were much more informed about who and why they voted ) than the last presidential election...I think that says plenty about your system...lesser of two evils you say...? try lesser of 700 evils (thats about how many political parties there are in my country)...people just throw up their hands and say "thats how the system works"..and its true, because "we" allow it to happen... actually, american idol counts votes, not voters, and each voter can vote up to seven or even ten times depending upon how they vote,,,, elections only allow us all one vote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well maybe if we televised the presidency as from a more advertising level in stead of such secret buisness as usual more people would react to it more instead of how well someone can sing they do advertise, they tell you why NOT to vote for someone else, instead of why we should vote for them(in most cases) one thing I liked about OBamas campaign was how rare it was to see such negative campaign ads approved by him |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well maybe if we televised the presidency as from a more advertising level in stead of such secret buisness as usual more people would react to it more instead of how well someone can sing they do advertise, they tell you why NOT to vote for someone else, instead of why we should vote for them(in most cases) one thing I liked about OBamas campaign was how rare it was to see such negative campaign ads approved by him Almost every ad Obama ran was negative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
singmesweet
on
Wed 09/29/10 09:33 AM
|
|
for those of you that doubt my sources http://prorev.com/bush2.htm go to that site it will show you the family tree starting with the weapons that his family started making back in the 1700s so as far as my sources and having a dung myth apparently you are mislead my friend that isn't really proof... it's another bush bashing website... why isn't any of the information in Wikipedia? when i looked, all wiki said is that they were in the banking business, and Rockefeller was not mentioned...I'll look again, just to make sure... Wiki isn't the most reliable source, either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well maybe if we televised the presidency as from a more advertising level in stead of such secret buisness as usual more people would react to it more instead of how well someone can sing Did you miss all the ads in the past? They were all over the TV. However, if more of the ads were geared toward why they would be a good choice, rather than why we shouldn't vote for someone else, it would be better. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Wed 09/29/10 09:50 AM
|
|
well maybe if we televised the presidency as from a more advertising level in stead of such secret buisness as usual more people would react to it more instead of how well someone can sing Did you miss all the ads in the past? They were all over the TV. However, if more of the ads were geared toward why they would be a good choice, rather than why we shouldn't vote for someone else, it would be better. 
I always wondered why those tactics work in elections. I mean if you go out somewhere and a guy comes up to you and starts talking about how terrible your ex was or how you shouldnt go out with some other guy who is present,,,,wouldnt you RUN the other way?...lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well maybe if we televised the presidency as from a more advertising level in stead of such secret buisness as usual more people would react to it more instead of how well someone can sing they do advertise, they tell you why NOT to vote for someone else, instead of why we should vote for them(in most cases) one thing I liked about OBamas campaign was how rare it was to see such negative campaign ads approved by him im not just talking about televising the election im talking about having cameras set up in the white house televising exactly what the president is doing this way people would make sure he as doing his job if celebrities can make entire tv shows about their life why can't the government do it considering they are running our lives we should have the right to see what they are doing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well maybe if we televised the presidency as from a more advertising level in stead of such secret buisness as usual more people would react to it more instead of how well someone can sing they do advertise, they tell you why NOT to vote for someone else, instead of why we should vote for them(in most cases) one thing I liked about OBamas campaign was how rare it was to see such negative campaign ads approved by him im not just talking about televising the election im talking about having cameras set up in the white house televising exactly what the president is doing this way people would make sure he as doing his job if celebrities can make entire tv shows about their life why can't the government do it considering they are running our lives we should have the right to see what they are doing I dont think everything the president does or that the government does should be broadcast to the world, some things should remain confidential and once there are cameras that confidentiality goes out the window |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well maybe if we televised the presidency as from a more advertising level in stead of such secret buisness as usual more people would react to it more instead of how well someone can sing they do advertise, they tell you why NOT to vote for someone else, instead of why we should vote for them(in most cases) one thing I liked about OBamas campaign was how rare it was to see such negative campaign ads approved by him im not just talking about televising the election im talking about having cameras set up in the white house televising exactly what the president is doing this way people would make sure he as doing his job if celebrities can make entire tv shows about their life why can't the government do it considering they are running our lives we should have the right to see what they are doing I'm guessing you don't understand the concept of National Security. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I miss the Bush twins!  
drunk as a skunk. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I miss the Bush twins!
drunk as a skunk.
Like you've never been drunk and or done something stupid? 
|
|
|
|
|
