Topic: President's Aunt's Statements Ignite Debate | |
---|---|
It ain't none of your dimes anyway. Neither one of you pay any income taxes, you both get rebates. did your meds just kick in or something? how do you know what i pay or don't pay? |
|
|
|
Are you kidding me? Do you want to see my paystub? I pay plenty every week. I don't get any refund. What country are you from? Do you just believe what you read or hear in the news? I pay in plenty to social security, income tax, property tax, sales tax, gas tax, utilities tax. You MUST be joking.
|
|
|
|
eSP?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eSP? i was lost on that one... do you not pay taxes either d? |
|
|
|
Hell Yeah I pay taxes...Everytime I buy anything with cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you not have a deduction for social security on your paystub? Do you not get a letter in the mail every couple years showing your earnings, and what you would receive if retired or disabled? Do you get that back at the end of the year? Do you feel that money should go to someone who has not earned it?
|
|
|
|
Do you not have a deduction for social security on your paystub? Do you not get a letter in the mail every couple years showing your earnings, and what you would receive if retired or disabled? Do you get that back at the end of the year? Do you feel that money should go to someone who has not earned it? yes, yes, no, no, by the way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The question I have and maybe this should be brought up to the legislature. If a person has over ran their visa or green card and are no longer legally here and they apply for the benefits that they are eligible for, shouldn't we make them go through the processing for legal status or mail their money to them in another country? Because we currently do give them their due on their way out if they want it. Actually there ara a lot stipulations. We RARELY give a lump sum and only when certain conditions are met or if circumstances support an exceptions case - which are legally described, either through the "Totalization Agreement" we have with a country, or based on some other existing legality. Legislation WAS presented at the end of 2009 (I think) to review the ENTIRE law surrounding "Totalization Agreements". I think that came up becase of the "totalization agreement' Bush signed with Mexico WITHOUT Congressional oversight or even a presentation of the documents. It did not make to the floor in this past session. This issue means 'fortunately' that the agreement with Mexico is NOT effective and for obvious reasons it could a devastating prospect. Hence the concern about how effective 'Totalization Agreements' really are. Just wanted to let you know that these issues ARE a current legislative concern. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Redykeulous
on
Thu 09/23/10 08:35 PM
|
|
"If I come as an immigrant, you have the obligation to make me a citizen," If you come legally. She did come legally. I am stating that the benefits she received are legally hers by our laws. She overstayed her visa, she is not here legallt, and has not been for at least six years. The benefits are not hers, she is not here legally. If she worked for the required period of time even IF illegally, and if SSI was deducted from her pay during that period (40 quarters, or 10 years, at a specified mimimum earnings) - the law IS that she be given SSI benefits, either upon retirement or in case of disability. HOWEVER, unless a totalization agreement exists between her home country and the U.S., she does not have to be paid if she does not stay here OR under some other pre-defined set of circumstances. But don't worry, she'll stay, becasue she has been granted asylum. The legalities in this case are so complex that even to debat it (as a specific case) is rediculous. BUT - as Dragoness has commented, it's not the CASE that holds her interest as much as it is the law and how it currently functions. |
|
|
|
what job did she have? Exactly. People want to defend the thousands of people receiving social security that have never paid in. Then they wonder why social security is broke. She paid in nothing, just as countless others, but we are to believe they are somehow entitled? Hope they feel that way when they pay in all their life, but receive nothing, because it is all gone. You know, all this piss'n and moan'n about who is getting SSI yet we let the government get away with a trillion dollars stolen from the bucket we all paid into. And GUESS WHERE ALL THE DOCUMENTS WERE that had been requested in support of where all that money went???? WELL - they had recenently been transferred to the newly remodeled area of the Pentagon - JUST BEFORE it got totally demolished by a non-existent air plane on 9/11. AMAZINGLY the government, who created LAWS that financial institutions HAVE to follow about backing up financial record systems OFF-SITE, had no secondary records, and no off-site storage. So the QUESTION of what happened to all that money will never be answered. I guess instead of making the government accountable, the next best thing is to complain about WHO is getting a $700 a month distribution. REALLY, does anyone here think that $700 a month will support them in 20 years? Well, it better, cos ya can't count on much of an increase, not when more than half the population is on it and only about half of the other percent are paying into it. |
|
|
|
IF is a big word isn't it? IF they worked, IF they paid in. How many illegals are paying taxes? The fact remains that these programs, social security, welfare, unemployment, were set up as a safety net for workers, not a way of life. Where does the funding come from if not the taxpaying citizens? Where does the funding come from when someone receives benefits, but never paid in? You can't write a check with no income, but the government does it all the time. When did people start thinking that only the rich pay taxes?
|
|
|
|
what job did she have? Exactly. People want to defend the thousands of people receiving social security that have never paid in. Then they wonder why social security is broke. She paid in nothing, just as countless others, but we are to believe they are somehow entitled? Hope they feel that way when they pay in all their life, but receive nothing, because it is all gone. You know, all this piss'n and moan'n about who is getting SSI yet we let the government get away with a trillion dollars stolen from the bucket we all paid into. And GUESS WHERE ALL THE DOCUMENTS WERE that had been requested in support of where all that money went???? WELL - they had recenently been transferred to the newly remodeled area of the Pentagon - JUST BEFORE it got totally demolished by a non-existent air plane on 9/11. AMAZINGLY the government, who created LAWS that financial institutions HAVE to follow about backing up financial record systems OFF-SITE, had no secondary records, and no off-site storage. So the QUESTION of what happened to all that money will never be answered. I guess instead of making the government accountable, the next best thing is to complain about WHO is getting a $700 a month distribution. REALLY, does anyone here think that $700 a month will support them in 20 years? Well, it better, cos ya can't count on much of an increase, not when more than half the population is on it and only about half of the other percent are paying into it. It isn't the one getting it, it is the thousands upon thousands getting it that adds up. |
|
|
|
Illegals do so pay taxes, they pay a large amount of taxes on this list plus paying into social security and income tax if they are using a social security number.'
Accounts Receivable Tax Building Permit Tax Capital Gains Tax CDL License Tax Cigarette Tax Corporate Income Tax Court Fines (indirect taxes) Dog License Tax Federal Income Tax Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA) Fishing License Tax Food License Tax Fuel Permit Tax Gasoline Tax (42 cents per gallon) Hunting License Tax Inheritance Tax Interest Expense (tax on the money) Inventory Tax I RS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax) IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax) Liquor Tax Local Income Tax Luxury Taxes Marriage License Tax Medicare Tax Property Tax Real Estate Tax Recreational Vehicle Tax Road Toll Booth Taxes Road Usage Taxes (truckers) Sales Taxes School Tax Septic Permit Tax Service Charge Taxes Social Security Tax State Income Tax State Unemployment Tax (SUTA) Telephone Federal Excise Tax Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax Telephone State and Local Tax Telephone Usage Charge Tax Toll Bridge Taxes Toll Tunnel Taxes Trailer Registration Tax Utility Taxes Vehicle License Registration Tax Vehicle Sales Tax Watercraft Registration Tax Well Permit Tax Workers’ Compensation Tax |
|
|
|
The social security would be fine if the government would stop borrowing from it.
|
|
|
|
How many of those taxes fund social security disability payments? Once again with the IF.
"if they are using a social security number.' No fund can be fine when more withdraw from it than pay into it. |
|
|
|
http://www.ctj.org/html/ssfund.htm
Q: How is the Social Security system funded? A: The Social Security system is funded primarily by federal taxation of payrolls. All workers who are not self-employed currently pay 7.65 percent of their gross salary in Social Security taxes. The employer for these workers pays an additional 7.65 percent, for a total "payroll tax" of 15.3 percent of gross salary. In addition, self-employed workers are required to pay 15.3 percent of their self-employment income in payroll taxes, minus certain special deductions. The Social Security portion of this tax applies only to a limited amount of income; in 2005, this limit was $90,000. The limit is adjusted for inflation yearly, and the tax rate itself has been raised at irregular intervals over time. The combined tax rate has been 15.3 percent since 1990. Last Updated 1/2/2006 |
|
|