Topic: Politicians | |
---|---|
Politicians and diapers should be changed often... for the same reason.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
chris_pc
on
Wed 07/14/10 05:01 PM
|
|
There are few men and women of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle.
|
|
|
|
There are few men and women of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. due to the combination of mans nature , and the nature of capitalism(where profit is the bottom line), there are few 'principled' people in any position of power 'principled' people are seen as weak leaders (ie, Jimmy Carter) |
|
|
|
There are few men and women of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. due to the combination of mans nature , and the nature of capitalism(where profit is the bottom line), there are few 'principled' people in any position of power 'principled' people are seen as weak leaders (ie, Jimmy Carter) HA! Ha! Hahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa ... JIMmeh! Cahtah ... ? Oh holy crappp ... 'incompetent Socialist' ... He tried to blame HIS failure as a 'leader' on the entire NATION - remember the 'malaise' speech? Remember 21% INFLATION ... ? Remember the Embassy takeover? Remember the failed rescue attempt? Remember the hostages being released when REAGAN was sworn in? Oh yeah ... JIMmeh! ... it is to laff ... |
|
|
|
...proving my point
|
|
|
|
i always thought a term limit on the senate would be a good idea....
|
|
|
|
i always thought a term limit on the senate would be a good idea.... Term limits wouldn't be necessary if more people would actually pay attention to what the hell goes on in Washington and got off their lazy ***** and voted the bums out. The model the founders created was perfect, they just didn't anticipate that a vast majority of people would care more about their lawn than their friggin government. |
|
|
|
There are few men and women of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. due to the combination of mans nature , and the nature of capitalism(where profit is the bottom line), there are few 'principled' people in any position of power 'principled' people are seen as weak leaders (ie, Jimmy Carter) The problem with Jimmy Carter was that he actually wanted to do some good but never had the support of his own party let alone the opposition. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely and positions of power attract the corruptible. |
|
|
|
...proving my point ... and mine. |
|
|
|
There are few men and women of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. due to the combination of mans nature , and the nature of capitalism(where profit is the bottom line), there are few 'principled' people in any position of power 'principled' people are seen as weak leaders (ie, Jimmy Carter) The problem with Jimmy Carter was that he actually wanted to do some good but never had the support of his own party let alone the opposition. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely and positions of power attract the corruptible. I agree, our system is set up that even the best intentions require COOPERATION from others,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
chris_pc
on
Wed 07/14/10 07:12 PM
|
|
There are few men and women of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. due to the combination of mans nature , and the nature of capitalism(where profit is the bottom line), there are few 'principled' people in any position of power 'principled' people are seen as weak leaders (ie, Jimmy Carter) The problem with Jimmy Carter was that he actually wanted to do some good but never had the support of his own party let alone the opposition. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely and positions of power attract the corruptible. I agree, our system is set up that even the best intentions require COOPERATION from others,,, Cooperation...now is that really too much to ask? I live in Canada and although our governments differ on some things, they share too many similarities. Partisan politics is killing us. More governing and less campaigning would be a good start. BTW, I like the way you think. |
|
|
|
There are few men and women of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. due to the combination of mans nature , and the nature of capitalism(where profit is the bottom line), there are few 'principled' people in any position of power 'principled' people are seen as weak leaders (ie, Jimmy Carter) The problem with Jimmy Carter was that he actually wanted to do some good but never had the support of his own party let alone the opposition. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely and positions of power attract the corruptible. I agree, our system is set up that even the best intentions require COOPERATION from others,,, Cooperation...now is that really too much to ask? I live in Canada and although our governments differ on some things, they share too many similarities. Partisan politics is killing us. More governing and less campaigning would be a good start. BTW, I like the way you think. thank you(been away for a couple days,,lol) |
|
|