What a huge dissappointment...Sandra was crowned the winner.

What did she do....nothing, basically....she didn't lead her team into winning a single challenge or ever win individual immunity. Heck, she couldn't even find an immunity idol on her own. And socially, she was BORING.

The whole intrigue of the game is to form alliances, use those alliances to survive, and then backstab an unsuspecting person. And in the end, the jury should not be bitter but say "hey, u got me good" and vote for the person that played the game the best.

The fans have spoken though (Sprint winner Russell) and declared a mistrial!!!

I could not stand Russell...he lied on the life of his kids to win a game...No I am glad he did not win..

It just doesn't make any sense though.....you have to betray and backstab people "NICELY" to win....who wants to watch that show....

Think about the game.....deceiving people is one of the main themes....without lying there is no deceit.

I hated what Russell did too sometimes....but that is the essence of the game. Pavarati and Russell were the biggest deceivers...the most hated...but they ended up in the final three because that's how to best play the game. Sandra only ended up in the final three because she was not a threat to anybody. And she only won because the jury was bitter that they were made to look like fools by Russell and Pavarati for trusting them....and the game is not about blind trust.