Previous 1 3
Topic: michael jackson and elvis presley
Melvin20020's photo
Tue 01/12/10 10:17 PM


michael jackson and elvis presley who is more talented?

RicanMamisita's photo
Tue 01/12/10 10:18 PM
Elvis.

DUH

Mayhem_J's photo
Tue 01/12/10 10:20 PM
Daft Punk

RicanMamisita's photo
Tue 01/12/10 10:28 PM
Hahaha.

Daft Punk

JasmineInglewood's photo
Tue 01/12/10 10:37 PM
Michael Jackson actually wrote his music...

Mayhem_J's photo
Tue 01/12/10 10:40 PM

Michael Jackson actually wrote his music...


And Michael didnt learn his moves from some handicapped kid named Forrest Gump

JasmineInglewood's photo
Tue 01/12/10 10:44 PM


Michael Jackson actually wrote his music...


And Michael didnt learn his moves from some handicapped kid named Forrest Gump


exactly. competition over.

Melvin20020's photo
Tue 01/12/10 10:47 PM


they are both excellent talented legends. However nobody can ever duplicate Michael Jackson's voice or moves. As Elizabeth Taylor said MJ no one will ever be MJ. And michael was world icon. michael jackson was great humanitarian

RicanMamisita's photo
Tue 01/12/10 10:48 PM
Freddie Mercury FTW

Mayhem_J's photo
Tue 01/12/10 10:50 PM

Freddie Mercury FTW


I second that!!

SitkaRains's photo
Tue 01/12/10 11:05 PM



michael jackson and elvis presley who is more talented?

On pure talent...Micheal Jackson.

On the type of person they were
hands down Elvis Presley

Jtevans's photo
Tue 01/12/10 11:07 PM
personally i think they both have more talent in death than they did in life......

msharmony's photo
Tue 01/12/10 11:12 PM
well michael could sing, dance, write, produce, but I think the only instrument he played was his voice

Elvis could sing and write and he played the guitar


I think MJ had MORE talents and a longer career in which to hone them,as well as more of a love for what he did. Who knows what Elvis might have been if he had started younger and had a harder work ethic(instead of the drugs and booze).

RicanMamisita's photo
Tue 01/12/10 11:17 PM
Edited by RicanMamisita on Tue 01/12/10 11:18 PM
Elvis had moves too.

plus he did movies.

What elvis would have been? LOL. Elvis is already somebody even with the drug/booze and early death.

You must know nothing of Elvis.


well michael could sing, dance, write, produce, but I think the only instrument he played was his voice

Elvis could sing and write and he played the guitar


I think MJ had MORE talents and a longer career in which to hone them,as well as more of a love for what he did. Who knows what Elvis might have been if he had started younger and had a harder work ethic(instead of the drugs and booze).

no photo
Tue 01/12/10 11:21 PM

well michael could sing, dance, write, produce, but I think the only instrument he played was his voice

Elvis could sing and write and he played the guitar


I think MJ had MORE talents and a longer career in which to hone them,as well as more of a love for what he did. Who knows what Elvis might have been if he had started younger and had a harder work ethic(instead of the drugs and booze).



Don't forget MJ had a bigger "young boy" fanbase also...

msharmony's photo
Tue 01/12/10 11:23 PM
I have seen Elvis in movies, and in televised concerts. Seems like his dance repertoire was pretty much one move,hip and leg gyrations (unless you count some of the stiff stuff that was choreographed into the movies). MJ was actually the innovator of so many dance moves and inspiration for many dancers which I doubt Elvis was.

Elvis was primarily a great singer/musician. I liked his songs, I just didnt see a diversity of talent in him as I did MJ. Not to say that he wasnt somebody with the booze, just speculating on how much MORE he could have been without it.



Elvis had moves too.

plus he did movies.

What elvis would have been? LOL. Elvis is already somebody even with the drug/booze and early death.

You must know nothing of Elvis.


well michael could sing, dance, write, produce, but I think the only instrument he played was his voice

Elvis could sing and write and he played the guitar


I think MJ had MORE talents and a longer career in which to hone them,as well as more of a love for what he did. Who knows what Elvis might have been if he had started younger and had a harder work ethic(instead of the drugs and booze).





msharmony's photo
Tue 01/12/10 11:24 PM


well michael could sing, dance, write, produce, but I think the only instrument he played was his voice

Elvis could sing and write and he played the guitar


I think MJ had MORE talents and a longer career in which to hone them,as well as more of a love for what he did. Who knows what Elvis might have been if he had started younger and had a harder work ethic(instead of the drugs and booze).



Don't forget MJ had a bigger "young boy" fanbase also...


Well , MJ started as a VERY young boy, what else could one expect....

RicanMamisita's photo
Tue 01/12/10 11:26 PM
just how MJ could have been much more without all the molestation accusations?

So...MJ was more of a dancer than Elvis, but that doesnt make him a better artist overall.

I have seen Elvis in movies, and in televised concerts. Seems like his dance repertoire was pretty much one move,hip and leg gyrations (unless you count some of the stiff stuff that was choreographed into the movies). MJ was actually the innovator of so many dance moves and inspiration for many dancers which I doubt Elvis was.

Elvis was primarily a great singer/musician. I liked his songs, I just didnt see a diversity of talent in him as I did MJ. Not to say that he wasnt somebody with the booze, just speculating on how much MORE he could have been without it.



Elvis had moves too.

plus he did movies.

What elvis would have been? LOL. Elvis is already somebody even with the drug/booze and early death.

You must know nothing of Elvis.


well michael could sing, dance, write, produce, but I think the only instrument he played was his voice

Elvis could sing and write and he played the guitar


I think MJ had MORE talents and a longer career in which to hone them,as well as more of a love for what he did. Who knows what Elvis might have been if he had started younger and had a harder work ethic(instead of the drugs and booze).






SitkaRains's photo
Tue 01/12/10 11:26 PM



well michael could sing, dance, write, produce, but I think the only instrument he played was his voice

Elvis could sing and write and he played the guitar


I think MJ had MORE talents and a longer career in which to hone them,as well as more of a love for what he did. Who knows what Elvis might have been if he had started younger and had a harder work ethic(instead of the drugs and booze).



Don't forget MJ had a bigger "young boy" fanbase also...


Well , MJ started as a VERY young boy, what else could one expect....

So did Elvis, MJ started young that is very true, he also believed he was so special that rules of morals didn't apply to him in many ways.
I actually think of MJ and feel pity, for such a talent that was warped and corrupted before he really had a chance.

JustAGuy2112's photo
Tue 01/12/10 11:27 PM
They were BOTH over rated.

Even more so now after their deaths.

Previous 1 3