1 3 Next
Topic: Welcoming for a War Criminal in Canada
no photo
Fri 10/23/09 03:17 PM


I must disagree with the statement that Junior Bush was elected twice by the American people. Any objective individual will agree that he did not win in 2000. Therefore, Junior was the only president to be re-elected without being elected.

History will not be kind to him and his henchmen. And will also not be kind to the American people for re-electing him in 2004 after experiencing his tyranny for 4 years.

War criminal? You bet.



Do you consider Truman a war criminal? Should he have been tried for dropping the atomic bombs on Japan?


Truman ended a war. Bush started one.

InvictusV's photo
Fri 10/23/09 03:28 PM
That isn't what I asked.

Obama could end both wars by dropping the bomb, would that make him a war criminal?

no photo
Fri 10/23/09 04:13 PM
I guess I should clarify my comment "true, many Canadians aren't the smartest...."
I am Canadian - I was being sarcastic.






I know Canadians are not the smartest people in the world so maybe someone should tell them that Bush is no longer in power and no longer runs the war.If they want to protest the war they should be protesting a man called Barrak obama who is the countries new president.Then again I guess you could keep doing what liberals do best...cry,complain,and blame someone else for your problems.


True, many Canadians aren't the smartest people in the world...but then again - who elected him twice?
I suspect that it's that kind of bigoted statement that causes the worldwide general dislike of America and in many cases Americans but then again, what do I know...I'm just a dumb Canadian.


I was just a dumb a$$, inexcusable remark, period. But I am considering the source. :wink:

heavenlyboy34's photo
Fri 10/23/09 04:20 PM

"Many morons pay big money to hear a terrorist talks about democracy, freedom, justice, property.......rofl rofl !!!."


I felt the same way when University of KY invited former pm Olmert to talk about Peace while he's responsible for the death of hundreds of innocent palestinians


I agree.

no photo
Fri 10/23/09 04:22 PM
That's a good question, Invictus. Definitely makes you think.

In this case, I'm not sure that the bomb would end the war. Our enemy is not a clearly defined geographic state, which could be brought to its knees by the bomb, but a tactic - terrorism - most visibly and organizationally represented by Al Qaeda. How do you nuke Al Qaeda?

But not to dodge your question. I can't conceive of a circumstance where dropping the bomb would be justifiable. So yes, dropping the bomb on Afghanistan or Iraq would be a war crime, because it would not end the war and potentially save lives.

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 10/23/09 04:34 PM

That isn't what I asked.

Obama could end both wars by dropping the bomb, would that make him a war criminal?
huh Drop the bomb on who? huh We arnt fighting a nation-state.:smile: And I am pretty sure the rest of the world would be extremely upset with the U.S. for doing so.:smile: Potentially fatally upset:smile:

RoamingOrator's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:29 PM

That's a good question, Invictus. Definitely makes you think.

In this case, I'm not sure that the bomb would end the war. Our enemy is not a clearly defined geographic state, which could be brought to its knees by the bomb, but a tactic - terrorism - most visibly and organizationally represented by Al Qaeda. How do you nuke Al Qaeda?

But not to dodge your question. I can't conceive of a circumstance where dropping the bomb would be justifiable. So yes, dropping the bomb on Afghanistan or Iraq would be a war crime, because it would not end the war and potentially save lives.


No, it wouldn't be a war crime. In order for there to be a war crime we must be at war with the nation. I saw Bush Jr. say into the camera on the deck of an aircraft carrier in like 2004, and I quote "The war is over. Mission accomplished."

If Obama dropped a bomb now, it would just be mass murder.

Dragoness's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:35 PM


That's a good question, Invictus. Definitely makes you think.

In this case, I'm not sure that the bomb would end the war. Our enemy is not a clearly defined geographic state, which could be brought to its knees by the bomb, but a tactic - terrorism - most visibly and organizationally represented by Al Qaeda. How do you nuke Al Qaeda?

But not to dodge your question. I can't conceive of a circumstance where dropping the bomb would be justifiable. So yes, dropping the bomb on Afghanistan or Iraq would be a war crime, because it would not end the war and potentially save lives.


No, it wouldn't be a war crime. In order for there to be a war crime we must be at war with the nation. I saw Bush Jr. say into the camera on the deck of an aircraft carrier in like 2004, and I quote "The war is over. Mission accomplished."

If Obama dropped a bomb now, it would just be mass murder.


What is the difference between a "military action" and a war?

Because we have never declared war on Iraq nor Afghanistan.

tohyup's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:47 PM

That isn't what I asked.

Obama could end both wars by dropping the bomb, would that make him a war criminal?

You mean dropping the bomb on your empty head ?. Yikes !!!.
Obama wouldn't do that.......laugh laugh .
May your hemorrhoids itch until you get some common sense.....
.....rofl rofl .

1 3 Next