Topic: Does It Matter To You? | |
---|---|
Edited by
Celticfc1888
on
Tue 10/13/09 02:46 PM
|
|
no ![]() |
|
|
|
Well, I dated a guy once who allegedly had a lot of money- by his own definition. He turned out to be a chap prick. So I'd rather just date the poor man, at least if he doesn't spend much it's because he doesn't have it, rather than being a cheapskate about it. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Well, I dated a guy once who allegedly had a lot of money- by his own definition. He turned out to be a chap prick. So I'd rather just date the poor man, at least if he doesn't spend much it's because he doesn't have it, rather than being a cheapskate about it. ![]() Sorry bout that And I agree The cheap ones are the worst!! ![]() |
|
|
|
at the end of the moneys only paper, theres far more important things in life. ![]() |
|
|
|
I do not mind since anyway the only treasure i want from her is not in her bank account. ![]() |
|
|
|
most of us would rather be happy and poor than rich and miserable
|
|
|
|
can i borrow a dub
![]() |
|
|
|
No, not really. Pearl Bailey once said, "I've been rich and I've been poor. Rich is better!" ![]() Oh great... ![]() Now you have me tap dancing around the house singing "Won't you come home Bill Bailey"... ![]() |
|
|
|
no ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Well, I dated a guy once who allegedly had a lot of money- by his own definition. He turned out to be a chap prick. So I'd rather just date the poor man, at least if he doesn't spend much it's because he doesn't have it, rather than being a cheapskate about it. ![]() Sorry bout that And I agree The cheap ones are the worst!! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
most of us would rather be happy and poor than rich and miserable ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() Yes. Sunny needs a Sugar Daddy... ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() Yes. Sunny needs a Sugar Daddy... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
no
|
|
|
|
She doesnt need to be a bum...but as long as she can support her self then its all gravy baby. I suppose this thinking makes sense but it kind of blows the women (and some men) who stay at home raiseing children careing for aged family members , contributeing to the community as volunteers, or who have disabilities that rule out working out of the water. I guess it depends a lot on how a person counts the contribution a partner makes in your life. If the only ability a man sees in me is to pay half the bills with the money I contribute I wouldn't want him if I had a million a day to chip into the pot. |
|
|
|
ive had money and ive been broke. ive never based my happiness on it
so it wouldnt matter |
|
|
|
Well, I dated a guy once who allegedly had a lot of money- by his own definition. He turned out to be a chap prick. So I'd rather just date the poor man, at least if he doesn't spend much it's because he doesn't have it, rather than being a cheapskate about it. ![]() Sorry bout that And I agree The cheap ones are the worst!! ![]() Yeah, he was a nutbag, too, but I can deal with crazy, it's cheapness I can't stand. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Mayhem_J
on
Tue 10/13/09 04:20 PM
|
|
She doesnt need to be a bum...but as long as she can support her self then its all gravy baby. I suppose this thinking makes sense but it kind of blows the women (and some men) who stay at home raiseing children careing for aged family members , contributeing to the community as volunteers, or who have disabilities that rule out working out of the water. I guess it depends a lot on how a person counts the contribution a partner makes in your life. If the only ability a man sees in me is to pay half the bills with the money I contribute I wouldn't want him if I had a million a day to chip into the pot. Well of course this is not the only factor...but I see it in a way that if something were to happen, and we ended up not staying together, then she could fend for herself. Or maybe something happens in this economy and I get fired. I would want a back up plan. Basicly I guess what I'm trying to say is a woman that could support herself if it were necessary. |
|
|
|
She doesnt need to be a bum...but as long as she can support her self then its all gravy baby. I suppose this thinking makes sense but it kind of blows the women (and some men) who stay at home raiseing children careing for aged family members , contributeing to the community as volunteers, or who have disabilities that rule out working out of the water. I guess it depends a lot on how a person counts the contribution a partner makes in your life. If the only ability a man sees in me is to pay half the bills with the money I contribute I wouldn't want him if I had a million a day to chip into the pot. Well of course this is not the only factor...but I see it in a way that if something were to happen, and we ended up not staying together, then she could fend for herself. Or maybe something happens in this economy and I get fired. I would want a back up plan. Basicly I guess what I'm trying to say is a woman that could support herself if it were necessary. <-- can support herself. ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|