Topic: for the men only
Queene123's photo
Sun 10/11/09 04:16 PM

DTHRomeo's photo
Sun 10/11/09 04:17 PM
Damn! drool

MirrorMirror's photo
Sun 10/11/09 04:19 PM


drool

no photo
Sun 10/11/09 04:20 PM
Edited by heartSoul on Sun 10/11/09 04:21 PM
Now who is going to clean all this drool up, dabnabit?!?grumble

:laughing:

Ted14621's photo
Sun 10/11/09 04:21 PM



Can I get an orifice search with that as well?

no photo
Sun 10/11/09 04:28 PM
thinks queenie should clean up all the drool in here lol

PATSFAN's photo
Sun 10/11/09 04:29 PM
:angry: This is offensive:angry:

randyrobinett's photo
Sun 10/11/09 04:54 PM
guess you have to sift through this crap to find the real deal in hererant frustrated

newarkjw's photo
Sun 10/11/09 04:57 PM

:angry: This is offensive:angry:


I am appalled. I feel so cheap.......smokin

Queene123's photo
Sun 10/11/09 05:09 PM

:angry: This is offensive:angry:


if she was naked, then it would had been but its not

TxsSun's photo
Sun 10/11/09 05:11 PM
I was searched by woman once.....

Not a good thing noway

daniel48706's photo
Sun 10/11/09 05:18 PM


:angry: This is offensive:angry:


if she was naked, then it would had been but its not


Not true queene, whether or not the picture was clothed has nothing to do with whether or not it is offensive.

I understand why some men would be offended, but I also understand the joke behind the post. Me, myself, I am not interested in the suggestions that this post gives, but some men ARE into that kind of thing.

Imagine for a second, if someone had come in and claimed the only reason you dated someone was because he was rich (not saying you would do that, just saying think about it for a moment). I trust you would be at least a little bit offended, right? Well, the same is true for some men, when it is suggested that they are only interested in physical "beauty" and sex.

Again, I can understand the joke behind the post, and personally think people coming in and complaining of being offended is a tad over the line, after all there was nothing "pornographic" or "innapropriate" for a public forum; but that is just my opinion as well, and as we all know, like an a$$, we all have oneflowerforyou

TxsSun's photo
Sun 10/11/09 05:21 PM


:angry: This is offensive:angry:


if she was naked, then it would had been but its not



He was only kidding whoa

PATSFAN's photo
Sun 10/11/09 05:21 PM
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaharofl rofl

Jtevans's photo
Sun 10/11/09 05:35 PM
drool drool drool

Quietman_2009's photo
Sun 10/11/09 05:40 PM
Edited by Quietman_2009 on Sun 10/11/09 05:40 PM
the offensive part of it isnt the girl or the implied sex

but that some people think men are that shallow that you can dangle a sex picture in front of them and treat em like dogs salivating for a kibble treat