Topic: Weapons | |
---|---|
Interesting but it is older than that. Tesla invented a 'free-energy'
device that pulls energy from the orbital electrical fields generated by the rotation of the earth. What would have happened to Westinghouse and General Electric if they had allowed that invention to be published? It would have made it possible for each houseold to generate their own energy without power lines or power companies. |
|
|
|
Yes Ive heard and read about Tesla. That is where Moray obtained his
ideas, but Moray's were far more harnassed and pratical. His sons are trying to rebuild his machine now! Tesla was a great man with many accomplishments like the AC motor, and is responsible for a lot of other things like wireless radio (his claim to fame), but the lightning weapon he was working on was uncontrollable! Moray could pull energy out of the pure air itself to run equipment.. |
|
|
|
Morning, Fanta,
Do you have a refernce to info on Moray? Cheers! Oceans |
|
|
|
just google him, Im sure it will show something...
|
|
|
|
back to topic....
i want as many and the biggest weapons i can find. and lots of ammo. dont forget the ammo. if the bad guy can have a weapon,,, and he can,,, i want a bigger weapon with more bullets and better killing power. sorryaboutit. |
|
|
|
-the experts agree Gun control works.
Stalin, Mau Tse Tung, Hitler, ect. -why would anyone but your enemy care if you were armed? -"for the first time we have full Gun control! the streets will be safer, our police more effective, and the world will follow our lead into the future." - Adolph Hitler 1335 |
|
|
|
Rambill, so you just upgrade your weapons until you have a nuclear bomb
or what? Problem is, that way we will never have peace, never. And in a few years time the earth is nonexistent. |
|
|
|
yup. upgrade all the time. you might be glad someones packin besides
the bad guy someday. i live in the real world. fact- Guns exist fact- the bad guys are packin fact- so am i |
|
|
|
Then, I'm sorry to say, you are not one bit better than them.
|
|
|
|
whatever, liberal. do you really want a government guarantee that the
good guys are disarmed? cmon. |
|
|
|
during the 60s riots, there was a town near detroit that did not want
thier town destroyed. They mounted a ma duece .50 cal machine gun on the roof of the courthouse. the riots were all around the town, but not in thier streets. hmmmm |
|
|
|
Isn't it funny then that in most Countries in the world it is not
allowed to carry arms, and we are all still alive? Violence attracts violence. It's as simple as that. |
|
|
|
theres a difference between living BY the gun and living WITH a gun. my
family has a history of gun ownership going back to before the civil war,,, more people have died in ted kennedys car than have been killed by my family. those countries that have banned guns... you might look at the crime statistics before and after. in every single case crime skyrocketed after guns were banned. Common sense tells us that criminals dont follow the law. when they know theres no way for the citizens to defend onesself, the crime rate will rise every single time. |
|
|
|
are you assuming that since i own guns that im violent? Only when
someones raping my daughter. IF trouble ever comes my way, i plan to fight back. i would be the wrong person to try to mug or rape my loved one. Does that make me bad because im able to fight back? |
|
|
|
No, I'm only saying that if you had a proper gunlaw, it would be harder
for the bad guys to get at guns. Why would they have none when every idiot can walk into a shop and buy a gun. I cannot and will not agree with a law that allows people to carry arms. That is where all the trouble starts. And yes, somebody who resolves to bear arms to me is violent, whether he uses them or not. Because arms are bought with the intent to use them. |
|
|
|
Invisible writes:
"And yes, somebody who resolves to bear arms to me is violent, whether he uses them or not. Because arms are bought with the intent to use them." I'm always struck by the answers one gets if one proposes the thought experiment of 'What if scientists and engineers were to invent an extremely effective and cheap non-lethal device to disarm/disable agressors? Would they be outlawed or would should they supplant fire arms as a means of self-defense.' You'll always here objections to those such as 'they might not work infallibly'. See, *I* think there's a Wild West mentality present that couldn't EVER accept the fact that no longer could a firearm owner reasonably give cause to dispense Frontier Justice. -Kerry O. |
|
|
|
PROPER GUN LAW?
there are already over 20,000 so called gun laws on the books. should we ban cars because someone used one for a drive by shooting? lets quit blaming tools for peoples actions. |
|
|
|
Zap walks in,shoulders his 92FS, and backs out slowly. Headin' for the
range to kill some paper. |
|
|
|
i blatently murdered some paper targets just today with nice tight
groups and im happy about it too. no remorse. |
|
|
|
http://www.brasscheck.com/antiguncrusade/modest.html
A dated piece but food for thought? |
|
|