Topic: Virtual Age | |
---|---|
well, my 'virtual age' was a year OLDER than my actual age.. what crap! LOL
|
|
|
|
well, my 'virtual age' was a year OLDER than my actual age.. what crap! LOL But you earn high points for honesty. |
|
|
|
well, my 'virtual age' was a year OLDER than my actual age.. what crap! LOL But you earn high points for honesty. yeah, must be the crazy wild life of a single mom of two, all that unhealthy eat, sleep and work that I do that's doin' me in.. lol |
|
|
|
well, my 'virtual age' was a year OLDER than my actual age.. what crap! LOL But you earn high points for honesty. yeah, must be the crazy wild life of a single mom of two, all that unhealthy eat, sleep and work that I do that's doin' me in.. lol The really cool thing is that you can wait for years to get things on track. I know, from experience. I'm supposed to live to 86, and the life that I used to live is just washed away. BTW, I work odd hours, high stress job, smoke, drive a lot, etc. In the final calculation, the personal happiness, low personal stress, and things that you control make the difference. You have a whole other life, ahead of you. |
|
|
|
Real Age: 31
Virtual Age: 13.3 Avg: Life expectancy:74 My Life expectancy: 91.7 Approx. another 22200 more days for me to live |
|
|
|
The results of the Virtual Age test should probably be adjusted upwards, by about 8%, for western civilized regions. I reviewed the founding methods for the Virtual Age formulas and discovered that the target population was restricted to Serbia. In that demographic and census pool there were almost no samples for the age range 60-70, and the factors for that age range were smoothed over. Another factor is the cut-off age of 100, because the authors determined that as the arbitrary end of life expectancy for the target group. Medical/healthcare and lifestyle circumstances in western regions are quite advanced, compared to the target group, and thus I chose to extend my Virtual Age output upwards by 8%. (In my case, the adjustment moves my life expectancy to 92.8 years, up from 85.9 years.) The results are based upon probability derived from formulas that incorporate factors as evident in the test choices. Probability is highly undependable for accuracy of individual results, but is used by insurers to measure risk according to predictable averages. |
|
|