Topic: If Rome
Peccy's photo
Wed 01/28/09 03:27 AM
wasn't built in a day, then how long did it take to build?

no photo
Wed 01/28/09 03:30 AM
175 years, 3 months, 2 days, 16 hours, 44 minutes and 28 seconds. drinker

no photo
Wed 01/28/09 03:34 AM
shades The city or the empire? shades

no photo
Wed 01/28/09 03:36 AM
The empire took 224 years, 7 months, 66 days, 36 minutes and 54 seconds longer than the city. ohwell

no photo
Wed 01/28/09 03:37 AM

no photo
Wed 01/28/09 04:07 AM
laugh laugh

PATSFAN's photo
Wed 01/28/09 04:08 AM
It's too bad they didn't have pre-fabs back thenlaugh

Peccy's photo
Wed 01/28/09 04:20 AM

It's too bad they didn't have pre-fabs back thenlaugh
that's how they built the pyramids though laugh laugh laugh

no photo
Wed 01/28/09 07:32 AM

wasn't built in a day, then how long did it take to build?


According to the Roman mythology, the founders of Rome were Romulus and Remus. So the city could just as easily have been named Reme.



no photo
Wed 01/28/09 07:33 AM
They're still building it...
i heard they just put in a drive thru pizza place across the way

scoundrel's photo
Wed 01/28/09 07:40 AM


wasn't built in a day, then how long did it take to build?


According to the Roman mythology, the founders of Rome were Romulus and Remus. So the city could just as easily have been named Reme.





That just sounds nasty.slaphead laugh

no photo
Wed 01/28/09 08:32 AM
Are we talking Italy or Georgia...if the latter, I'd say pretty cotton-pickin' fast...