Topic: Why I believe In God. | |
---|---|
Christian scholars maybe. Not any credible archeologist or cultural or physical anthropologists. Again, you dont know what your talking about. Theologians liberal or conservative weigh all the evidence. Do you want me to qoute historians who's specialty is during this time. Theologians are not objective. That is ignorance. Would a historian be better? Read my 4 facts. Look everyone up. |
|
|
|
theology - the rational and systematic study of religion and its influences and of the nature of religious truth Two words that don't go together. . . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Nubby
on
Sun 01/25/09 06:14 PM
|
|
I am done with this thread. Sorry three facts.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Krimsa
on
Sun 01/25/09 06:17 PM
|
|
Which fact did you abandon? Oh nevermind it always was 3 facts. Im changing the title to "3 Unfounded Assertions." Thats a much more accurate description.
|
|
|
|
I am done with this thread. Sorry three facts. |
|
|
|
I am done with this thread. Sorry three facts. I don't know why religious people always get real offended and/or defensive real quick. I mean, atheist/agonistic folk are in the minority, right? We're the ones putting up with religious soliciters on Sundays and are forced to live by their rules... (i.e. illegalizing abortion, no same-sex marriages, ...) Oh well, I'm a happy atheist. Happy Happy Joy Joy! |
|
|
|
Edited by
MorningSong
on
Wed 01/28/09 03:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am done with this thread. Sorry three facts. I don't know why religious people always get real offended and/or defensive real quick. I mean, atheist/agonistic folk are in the minority, right? We're the ones putting up with religious soliciters on Sundays and are forced to live by their rules... (i.e. illegalizing abortion, no same-sex marriages, ...) Oh well, I'm a happy atheist. Happy Happy Joy Joy! You will notice that this has become a problem in the General Religion forum. We merely question, ask for appropriate discussion and or debate and this is met with claims of "bashing" and "attack." I really think the people making these unfounded accusations need to take a moment to look up the definitions of the words "bashing" and "attack." If you feel this to be the case, then report it to admin. |
|
|
|
Edited by
davidben1
on
Wed 01/28/09 02:08 PM
|
|
what of the "solvers forum", where all words are "spoken freely", as this would indeed draw away all the "perseucter's" to a persecuter heaven, and leave all the persecuted to perscute each other in all the other forums???
it seems a solvers forum would serve many purpose's unto solving in ways as described??? proposed before all just in case the mods agreed and all powers would honor such a request??? is it thought that MINGLE2 would expose itself to liability in doing this??? what other concern or reason would there be to not grant such a request? the sign of the door would clearly state one is leaving the "defined spirituality code of censored speech"??? of course AS ALWAYS, any speech that is deemed a CRIMMINAL OFFENSE, is ALWAYS IN ALL PLACES subject to these crimminal laws of FINE OR IMPRISONMENT OF SELF??? so the only difference of the "solvers forum", is one thing, no spiritual code of speech??? how would or could this be a bad??? |
|
|
|
so start a topic david and make it what ever you like. problem solved
|
|
|
|
so start a topic david and make it what ever you like. problem solved why would i ask for what i may already do??? i ask of other things more than just a thread??? why do you send flowers with your vinegar??? |
|
|
|
why do you send flowers with your vinegar???
|
|
|
|
(Nubby:)
I am done with this thread. Sorry three facts. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Bushidobillyclub
on
Wed 01/28/09 09:32 PM
|
|
I am an atheist asshole. I am a gay agnostic (?) asshole. Now... which one do we all have in common.. lmao ok couldn't help myself.... Good video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zX_qRIPuLb4 I don't really disagree with this, in this context if you want to say I have a positive disbelief in god, sure, makes no difference. I HAVE weighed the evidence, and DO understand the apologetic arguments and have deemed them unworthy of intellectual respect. I positively rank active theistic belief in god (ie receiving messages and protections from a magical sky daddy) as being on par with pink invisible flying unicorns. I would positively enjoy a real debate on any of the science most especially physics based apologetic arguments. |
|
|