Only 16% now believe official fable according to New York Times/CBS News poll

Truth Movement has the huge majority of opinion

How will the Bush Cabal react?

/ Prisonplanet.com | October 14 2006

A monumental new scientific opinion poll has emerged which declares that only 16% of people in America now believe the official government explanation of the September 11th 2001 terror attacks.

According to the new New York Times/CBS News poll, only 16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11 and the intelligence prior to the attacks:

"Do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?

Telling the truth 16%

Hiding something 53%

Mostly lying 28%

Not sure 3%"

The 84% figure mirrors other recent polls on the same issue. A Canadian Poll put the figure at 85%. A CNN poll had the figure at 89%. Over 80% supported the stance of Charlie Sheen when he went public with his opinions on 9/11 as an inside job.

A recent CNN poll found that the percentage of Americans who blame the Bush administration for the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington rose from almost a third to almost half over the past four years. This latest poll shows that that figure has again risen exponentially and now stands at well over three quarters of the population.

It took 35 plus years for the majority of Americans to wake up to the fact that the assassination of JFK was a government operation. It has only take five years for MORE Americans to wake up to the fact that 9/11 was an inside job on behalf of the Neoconservative crime syndicate within the US.

Reference to past polls show that in the last five years there has been an explosion in numbers of those who do not buy the official line.

In 2004 a Zogby Poll showed that just over half of New Yorkers believed there was a cover up.

In May of this year another Zogby poll indicated that around half of ALL Americans did not buy the official story.

The latest poll also shows a massive awakening has occurred recently given that previous estimates indicated that around 34% still believed the official story and around 30% were oblivious altogether.

Alex Jones declared that the Truth movement has cause to celebrate this evening as it is now beyond any doubt that the vast majority of Americans know that the official story of 19 Saudis with box cutters is ludicrous.

The diligence of those who have worked to educate the world on 9/11 truth from day one cannot be underestimated. We are now seeing the fruits of this hard and at times extremely trying labor hit home.

We would add that although this is a major victory for the truth movement it does not mean that the hard work can stop.

The next step is to use the majority opinion as leverage towards officially changing the record of what happened on 9/11, forcing the mainstream media into addressing the issue, not as a quirky news item, but as a serious re-defining of the state of the nation and the world today.

We have not taken the country back yet and the cabal that has taken control of the government continues to systematically use 9/11 and the war on terror as an excuse to destroy the Constitutional foundations of law and order in America.

As it becomes clearer that more and more Americans KNOW that their government is lying to them on the most fundamental issue of their lifetimes, we must consider what kind of reaction the government will undertake.

Remember that the majority of American voters now believe the Sept. 11 terrorist attack was a more significant historical event than the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

In July 2001 Alex jones issued an emergency warning that there was going to be a massive false flag terrorist attack in New York to be blamed on Osama Bin Laden. At that time there was not enough activism among the population to prevent it going ahead.

In August of 2006 Alex Jones issued a second emergency warning that all the factors pointed towards an imminent attack. The activism that occurred in the wake of this warning and that of others was exponential and may indeed have helped stave off another attack.

Our next warning is this, desperate times call for desperate measures. The criminal elements of the government now know that they have been totally exposed and are reviled by the majority of free thinking Americans. Will their response be to vamp up the crack down on that free thinking itself?

In essence Americans have outright REJECTED giving up their liberty for security in the wake of 9/11. The only security IS liberty itself, and the only way to stay secure is to constantly defend liberty.


Global Research Articles by Steve Watson


http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=WAT20061020&articleId=3553

You believe that?I got some nice ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you.Enought of the 9/11 conspiercies.We all know what happened we all know it wasn't a inside job because after 7 years not a single person has been indited or gone to jail.We all know every anti-Bush anti-American has tried to find one person who they could arrest and put in jail to prove 9/11 was a inside job and yet nothing has happened.

Here is the link to the CNN poll results. somehow your in the minority
http://www.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/results/14340.exclude.html

I suppose I should be the one offering to sell you some nice ocean front property in Arizona

71 views and one comment.We all know that CNN stands for the Communist news network.They are nothing but a bunch of far left liberals who would love to watch America get destroyed from the inside out.Thats why they do specials on Taliban snipers shooting Americans.They are just as bad as Jane fonda sitting in the Anti aircraft guns in Vietnam.Sorry anything that comes from CNN is just a bunch of bull**** to me.Try finding a credible news source.

Its realy nice land the water is verry blue and free of sharks

Good grief. Some arab guys that had been indoctrinated to hate America took advantage of simple freedoms that Americans enjoy everyday and then hijacked airplanes and flew them into buildings. End of story. Plain and simple and exactly what happened on 911.

I didnt have anything to do with the Poll I didnt even vote in the poll I just thought it was verry interesting. I became interested when Bush and Cheneye refused to speak to the 911 commission under oath and they insisted t hey be together durring the interviews. the truth is nothing to be afraid of eh?

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=6529228&page=1

This poll says Bush is still the 2nd most admired man in America.

Really? We all know what happened, do we? Please, enlighten me, exactly what happened?

It wasn't an inside job, because nobodies been indicted? You're right, including Osama Bin Laden. Go to the FBI home page and look up the 10 most wanted, you'll see a list of charges on OBL and he isn't being blamed for 9/11 there.

How is that the fire that supposedly was so hot to melt structural steel, somehow didn't burn the "terrorists" passports?
Why is it that the Government released a total of 3 seconds of what hit the pentagon, after confiscating dozens upon dozens of tapes?

What is it that happened to building 7?

Why is it that the head janitor on duty, who was the man running back into the buildings with the master keys to unlock firedoors for the firefighters, Willie Rodriguez, flatly says there were bombs in those buildings?

Is it just coincidence then that Marvin Bush was head of the WTC security until 9/10?

This is just the stuff off the top of my head and after a long night at work. I could go on in infinite about unanswered questions and easily debunkable lies and lets not get started on that fiction called the "9/11 Comission Report".

I do not understand why they botherd to interview Bush and Cheneye if they wouldnt go under oath. It bascily allowed them to lie without repercusions.

People are uniformed. I don't think there is much wisdom that can be found in polls. There could be some foul play with 9/11. There is proof we had the information of the event before it happened, and it was ignored. It did give an excuse more some shorter leashes on Americans. But these could be mere coincidences. I for one am stuck on the fact that there was 2.5 trillion dollars that "mysteriously" went missing from the Pentagon just before it happened. In fact the story was published on September 10th 2001 on CNN i believe. But, it is important not to draw too many conclusions without hard evidence. And to base ones opinion on the opinion of the masses is a major critical thinking error... IMO

I find it hard to believe that the Bush admin planned 9/11 out. They couldn't even lie about starting a war with Iraq with a straight face, and look at how much they blundered that. O_O

At least you are consistent.

I personally find it hard to believe that Bush could personally plant explosives in the WTC, but yet he could not manage to plant WMDs in Iraq.

The WTC was filled with policemen, firemen, and assorted civilians, yet Bush was able to plant bombs there without getting caught.

Iraq has huge areas that are not inhabited where Bush could easily plant WMDs, yet he did not plant the evidence that would have greatly increased his power and popularity.

So why wouldnt Bush and Cheneye go under oath before the 911 commission? and why did they insist they be interviewed together? I dont get it. I can just picture it though the special ops boys being photographed by french spy satalites planting wmds in the desert

1. The fires never melted the steel, but when you add together the structural damage by the planes hitting the building, the fire-proofing that was blown off of the sections that got hit, and the fires, you end up with steel that is compromised enough to lead to a collapse, which is what we say.

2. The camera the Pentagon released the footage from is a very low-tech security camera that captures images at a rate of somewhere around 1 frame per second.

3. It turns out that when not 1, but 2 building fall into you, and rip out a big, gaping hole in your side, you lose structural integrity and fall down. (If you look for pictures of building 7,taken on 9/11, from the side facing the Twin Towers, you will see the reason it fell.)

4. One guy says there are bombs. If there were actually bombs in either tower, they would have been obvious to everyone. There is no way you can wire bombs throughout building of that size, without someone noticing.

5. Yes.

Thats the problem, in my opinion, blaming it just on Bush. He's a puppet. This nation is no stranger to self inflicted wounds. Gulf of Tonkin and the Uss Maine come to mind.

I can remember when I became interested in 911. I was watching CNN and they were saying how after a great effort Bush and Cheneye said that at last they would speak to the 911 commision but not under oath and only if they were together. This made me wonder why so I began doing some research. It turns out that many many firemen that were at ground zero said they heard bombs going off. the man who designed the towers said they could withstand multiple plane impacts, police on the scene also said they heard bombs going off. There was a media blackout on all this. All the information you need is out there if you care to search it out. I do not know what is accurate and what isnt but I do know something is wrong with the official version of 911, something doesnt add up and that is exactly what the poll says. the poll doesnt say Bush did it or Massad or the Cia. It simply says most americans think something is fishy and I agree.

1)Thats not what the "Official" story says. It says that the jet fuel softened the steel. However, jet fuel is something like 4/5 kerosene. If I am to believe that is sufficient to melt, my fault, "soften" steel, then I should watch out every time I use my coleman stove. If it was just structural damage, leading to the other damage you cited, then explain the total collapse of the building, into it's own footprint? As a sidenote, if thats the case, that it was weakened enough to lead to a collapse, shouldn't it have went in sections and not all smooth and fluid at free fall speed?

2)Thats right, the only footage released is 3 seconds from a sad pathetic camera. The Pentagon has dozens, if not hundreds of cameras all over it, not to mention the confiscation of every video tape that they could grab within view of the pentagon strike. To release the 3 seconds which shows nothing, but a little fire ball is fishy at best.

3) Okay, big gaping hole? I grant you there was a gouge, but big gaping hole? For debates sake, lets say there was a "big" gaping hole. Once again then why did it fall at freefall speed directly into it's own footprint. When a Logger knocks a gouge out of a building, it falls in the direction that the gouge was placed, not straight down. Same holds true for demolition. If you don't place the charges in the right place, you have a building that falls in whatever direction the blast knocks out first. Building 7 came down just as pretty as any demo you'd see in on the Vegas strip. Also, How is it that the BBC was reporting Building 7's demise a full 20 minutes before it actually came down?

4)It is fact that security was pulled for some 2 weeks, for "inspectors" to check the asbestos that was used to protect the aforementioned steel.
Who has the authority to pull security?

5) Coincidence is far to rare to pop up this often on one day.

I have cut down alot of trees and you knotch them to get them to fall in the direction you wish. I cant understand why the buildings didnt fall towards the "knotch" created by the plane impact that being the weakest point. they simply fell straight down as if demolished. 3 out of 3 fell like that. hmmmmmmmmm